Democracy.com: A Tale of Political Blogs and Content

The debate about the role of political blogs in politics generally and its effect on democracy and participation in particular has deepened since the 2008 U.S. presidential election. While some studies warn that the Internet may undermine deliberation, and replicate patterns of homophily and polarization among blogs with the same political inclination, other studies emphasize the potential of the Internet to strengthen cross-ideological discourse and participation. This paper suggests, using a hybrid theoretical framework which acknowledges homophily and the power law distribution among political blogs, and at the same time exhibits the use of the Internet also as a cross-participation platform and as strengthening participation. For that purpose, this paper looks at 83 videos that went viral during the 2008 election and examines patterns of behavior of the top 50 political blogs (conservative and liberal) in respect these videos over a period of two years.

[1]  Scott P. Robertson,et al.  YouTube and Facebook: Online Video "Friends" Social Networking , 2009 .

[2]  John M. Sides,et al.  Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics , 2010, Perspectives on Politics.

[3]  Martina Morris,et al.  A statnet Tutorial. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[4]  T. Snijders.  Statistical Models for Social Networks , 2011 .

[5]  Daniel W. Drezner,et al.  The power and politics of blogs , 2007 .

[6]  Deva R. Woodly,et al.  New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation , 2007 .

[7]  M. Castells.  Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[8]  Kevin Wallsten,et al.  “Yes We Can”: How Online Viewership, Blog Discussion, Campaign Statements, and Mainstream Media Coverage Produced a Viral Video Phenomenon , 2010 .

[9]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[10]  Aaron D. Shaw,et al.  A Tale of Two Blogospheres , 2012 .

[11]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[12]  C. Butts.  Social network analysis: A methodological introduction , 2008 .

[13]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Power-Law Distribution of the World Wide Web , 2000, Science.

[14]  K. Barzilai-Nahon.  Toward a theory of network gatekeeping , 2008 .

[15]  David Karpf,et al.  Understanding Blogspace , 2008 .

[16]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers , 2007 .

[17]  R. Klotz.  The Sidetracked 2008 YouTube Senate Campaign , 2010 .

[18]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Neither Hayek nor Habermas , 2007 .

[19]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com , 2001 .

[20]  M. Hindman.  The Myth of Digital Democracy , 2008 .

[21]  Philip N. Howard,et al.  Network Ethnography and the Hypermedia Organization: New Media, New Organizations, New Methods , 2002, New Media Soc..

[22]  Karine Nahon,et al.  Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Power-Law Distribution of the World Wide Web , 2000, Science.

[24]  Karine Nahon,et al.  Gatekeeping: A critical review , 2009, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.