The processing of phonological, orthographical, and lexical information of Chinese characters in sentence contexts: An ERP study

In the current work, we aimed to study the processing of phonological, orthographical, and lexical information of Chinese characters in sentence contexts, as well as to provide further evidence for psychological models. In the experiment, we designed sentences with expected, homophonic, orthographically similar, synonymous, and control characters as endings, respectively. The results indicated that P200 might be related to the early extraction of phonological information. Moreover, it might also represent immediate semantic and orthographic lexical access. This suggested that there might be a dual-route in cognitive processing, where the direct access route and the phonologically mediated access route both exist and interact with each other. The increased N400 under the control condition suggested that both phonological and orthographical information would influence semantic integration in Chinese sentence comprehension. The two positive peaks of the late positive shift might represent the semantic monitoring, and orthographical retrieval and reanalysis processing, respectively. Under the orthographically similar condition, orthographical retrieval and reanalysis processing was more difficult in comparison with the other conditions, which suggested that there might be direct access from orthography to semantic representation in cognitive processing. In conclusion, it was shown that the direct access hypothesis or the dual-route hypothesis could better explain cognitive processing in the brain.

[1]  E Donchin,et al.  Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  D. Caplan,et al.  Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  H. Kolk,et al.  Late positivities in unusual situations , 2007, Brain and Language.

[4]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. , 1994 .

[5]  V. Mann,et al.  Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children , 2002 .

[6]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[7]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2004, Science.

[8]  T. Conway,et al.  Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. , 1999 .

[9]  F. Chua.  Phonological recoding in Chinese logograph recognition. , 1999 .

[10]  C. Perfetti,et al.  VERY EARLY PHONOLOGICAL ACTIVATION IN CHINESE READING , 1995 .

[11]  Z. Breznitz,et al.  Phonological and orthographic processing of Hebrew words: electrophysiological aspects. , 1998, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[12]  J. Connolly,et al.  The effects of phonological and semantic features of sentence-ending words on visual event-related brain potentials. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in Language Perception: Mild and Strong Conflicts Elicit Different ERP Patterns , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Bernadette M. Jansma,et al.  Neural aspects of cohort-size reduction during visual gating , 2007, Brain Research.

[15]  P. Hagoort.  On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Z. Ye,et al.  Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs , 2008, Brain Research.

[17]  P300 and anticipated task difficulty. , 1987, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  M J Chen,et al.  Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Ying Liu,et al.  ERP evidence for the time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic information in Chinese meaning and pronunciation decisions. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[21]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[22]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[23]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: an event-related potential study , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  J. Cohen,et al.  P300, stimulus intensity, modality, and probability. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[25]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[26]  Doris Aaronson,et al.  A model for coding lexical categories during reading. , 1983 .

[27]  C. Perfetti,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of semantic and phonological processing in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders , 2007, Brain and Language.

[28]  J. Ziegler,et al.  From print to meaning: an electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing word meaning. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Ying,et al.  The timing of graphic, phonological and semantic activation of high and low frequency Chinese characters： An ERP study , 2007 .

[30]  T. Ditman,et al.  Electrophysiological insights into the processing of nominal metaphors , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Zhixing Jin,et al.  The effects of punctuations in Chinese sentence comprehension: An ERP study , 2010, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[32]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[33]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[35]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400 , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Zhixing Jin,et al.  The pragmatic meanings conveyed by function words in Chinese sentences: An ERP study , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[38]  H. Shu,et al.  Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an FMRI study using word-category ambiguity. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  R. McCarley,et al.  Event-related potentials elicited during a context-free homograph task in normal versus schizophrenic subjects. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[41]  G. Feng,et al.  Rowed to recovery: the use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[43]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese , 1999 .

[44]  Hua Shu,et al.  ERP correlates of the development of orthographical and phonological processing during Chinese sentence reading , 2008, Brain Research.

[45]  Zhixing Jin,et al.  Chinese function words grammaticalized from content words: Evidence from ERPs , 2010, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[46]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. , 2000 .

[47]  M. Posner,et al.  Establishing a time‐line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event‐related potentials , 1998, Neuroreport.

[48]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Phonology Matters: The Phonological Frequency Effect in Written Chinese , 2000, Psychological science.

[49]  K Rayner,et al.  The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.