Effects of Electrode Array Length on Frequency-Place Mismatch and Speech Perception with Cochlear Implants

Frequency-place mismatch often occurs after cochlear implantation, yet its effect on speech perception outcome remains unclear. In this article, we propose a method, based on cochlea imaging, to determine the cochlear place-frequency map. We evaluated the effect of frequency-place mismatch on speech perception outcome in subjects implanted with 3 different lengths of electrode arrays. A deeper insertion was responsible for a larger frequency-place mismatch and a decreased and delayed speech perception improvement by comparison with a shallower insertion, for which a similar but slighter effect was noticed. Our results support the notion that selecting an electrode array length adapted to each individual's cochlear anatomy may reduce frequency-place mismatch and thus improve speech perception outcome.

[1]  Robert F. Labadie,et al.  Anatomic verification of a novel method for precise intrascalar localization of cochlear implant electrodes in adult temporal bones using clinically available computed tomography , 2010, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  R. Filipo,et al.  The importance of intra-operative imaging during cochlear implant surgery , 2009, Cochlear implants international.

[3]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Role of Electrode Placement as a Contributor to Variability in Cochlear Implant Outcomes , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M. Dorman,et al.  Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  A. B. Grayeli,et al.  Is Electrode-Modiolus Distance a Prognostic Factor for Hearing Performances after Cochlear Implant Surgery? , 2013, Audiology and Neurotology.

[7]  G. Paludetti,et al.  Cochlear implant patients' speech understanding in background noise: effect of mismatch between electrode assigned frequencies and perceived pitch , 2010, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[8]  Bernard Fraysse,et al.  The Size of the Cochlea and Predictions of Insertion Depth Angles for Cochlear Implant Electrodes , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[9]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Effects of Extreme Tonotopic Mismatches Between Bilateral Cochlear Implants on Electric Pitch Perception: A Case Study , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Hamish Innes-Brown,et al.  Adaptation of the communicative brain to post-lingual deafness. Evidence from functional imaging , 2014, Hearing Research.

[11]  C. Turner,et al.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation , 2014, Neuroscience.

[12]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Image-Guidance Enables New Methods for Customizing Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategies , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  Gregory Valentini,et al.  Implications of Deep Electrode Insertion on Cochlear Implant Fitting , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[14]  R. Shannon,et al.  Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[15]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Simulations of tonotopically mapped speech processors for cochlear implant electrodes varying in insertion depth. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  H J McDermott,et al.  Comparison of current speech coding strategies. , 1993, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[17]  Hugh McDermott,et al.  Electro-Acoustic Stimulation , 2009, Audiology and Neurotology.

[18]  A. Beynon,et al.  Pre-, Per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  D. D. Greenwood.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Acoustic to Electric Pitch Comparisons in Cochlear Implant Subjects with Residual Hearing , 2006, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[21]  Karen M Mispagel,et al.  Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[22]  M W Skinner,et al.  Effect of frequency boundary assignment on speech recognition with the speak speech-coding strategy. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[23]  Paul J Boyd,et al.  Potential Benefits From Deeply Inserted Cochlear Implant Electrodes , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[24]  C. Jolly,et al.  Achievement of hearing preservation in the presence of an electrode covering the residual hearing region , 2011, Acta Oto-Laryngologica.

[25]  Jean-Philippe Cottier,et al.  Midmodiolar Reconstruction as a Valuable Tool to Determine the Exact Position of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Array , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[26]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Assessment of Electrode Placement and Audiological Outcomes in Bilateral Cochlear Implantation , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[27]  Peter Nopp,et al.  Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: An evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus , 2008, Hearing Research.

[28]  Cheng Cheng,et al.  Improving false discovery rate estimation , 2004, Bioinform..

[29]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  A Model of Incomplete Adaptation to a Severely Shifted Frequency-to-Electrode Mapping by Cochlear Implant Users , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[30]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations , 1996, Hearing Research.

[31]  Alessandro Scorpecci,et al.  Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting , 2010, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[32]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[33]  U. Baumann,et al.  Pitch Matching Psychometrics in Electric Acoustic Stimulation , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[34]  Irfan Durmo,et al.  Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study , 2014, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[35]  Ning Zhou,et al.  The effects of frequency-place shift on consonant confusion in cochlear implant simulations. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  A. Faulkner,et al.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Electric to acoustic pitch matching: a possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting , 2008, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[38]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Effects of upper-frequency boundary and spectral warping on speech intelligibility in electrical stimulation. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Integration of acoustic and electrical hearing. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.