Artifacts Found During Quality Assurance Testing of Computed Radiography and Digital Radiography Detectors

A series of artifact images, obtained over 5 years of performance testing, of both computed radiography (CR) and integrated digital radiographic X-ray imaging detectors are presented. The images presented are all either flat field or test object images and show artifacts previously either undescribed in the existing literature or meriting further comment. The artifacts described are caused by incorrect flat field corrections, a failing amplifier, damaged detector lines affecting their neighbors, lost information between neighboring detector tiles, image retention, delamination of a detector, poor setup of mechanical movements in CR, suckers damaging a CR plate, inappropriate use of grid suppression software, inappropriate use of a low pass spatial frequency filter, and unsharp masking filters. The causes and significance of the artifacts are explained and categorized as software or hardware related. Actions taken to correct the artifacts are described and explained. This work will help physicists, radiographers, and radiologists identify various image quality problems and shows that quality assurance is useful in identifying artifacts.

[1]  K. Andriole,et al.  Artifacts in chest radiographs with a third-generation computed radiography system. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Charles E. Willis,et al.  Artifacts and misadventures in digital radiography , 2004 .

[3]  Wang Xiang-quan.  Artifacts found in computed radiography and corresponding disposal , 2008 .

[4]  J W Oestmann,et al.  Hardware and software artifacts in storage phosphor radiography. , 1991, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  Chengyu Shi.  Specifications, Performance Evaluation and Quality Assurance of Radiographic and Fluoroscopic Systems in the Digital Era , 2006 .

[6]  John A. Rowlands,et al.  Investigation of lag and ghosting in amorphous selenium flat-panel x-ray detectors , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  D. Jaffray,et al.  A ghost story: spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager. , 1999, Medical physics.

[8]  John M. Boone,et al.  Flat-field correction technique for digital detectors , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[9]  A R Cowen,et al.  Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[10]  Andrew Ho,et al.  Recognition and Prevention of Computed Radiography Image Artifacts , 2006, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[11]  Alistair Mackenzie,et al.  Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors. , 2007, Medical physics.

[12]  Frank N. Ranallo.  Recommended Standards for the Routine Performance Testing of Diagnostic X‐Ray Imaging Systems, IPEM Report No. 77 , 1998 .

[13]  Safa Kasap,et al.  Dependence of x-ray sensitivity of direct conversion x-ray detectors on x-ray exposure and exposure history , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  S S Sagel,et al.  Artifacts in computed radiography. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. , 2003, Medical physics.

[16]  S. Evans,et al.  Recommended Standards For The Routine Performance Testing of Diagnostic X-Ray Imaging Systems , 1998 .

[17]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Aliasing effects in digital images of line-pair phantoms. , 2002, Medical physics.

[18]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.