Electronic Textiles as Disruptive Designs: Supporting and Challenging Maker Activities in Schools

Electronic textiles are a part of the increasingly popular maker movement that champions existing do-it-yourself activities. As making activities broaden from Maker Faires and fabrication spaces in children's museums, science centers, and community organizations to school classrooms, they provide new opportunities for learning while challenging many current conventions of schooling. In this article, authors Yasmin Kafai, Deborah Fields, and Kristin Searle consider one disruptive area of making: electronic textiles. The authors examine high school students’ experiences making e-textile designs across three workshops that took place over the course of a school year and discuss individual students’ experiences making e-textiles in the context of broader findings regarding themes of transparency, aesthetics, and gender. They also examine the role of e-textiles as both an opportunity for, and challenge in, breaking down traditional barriers to computing.

[1]  E. Hargittai.  Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”* , 2010 .

[2]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  What Kind of a Girl Does Science? The Construction of School Science Identities , 2000 .

[3]  Florence R. Sullivan.  Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding , 2008 .

[4]  Kristin A. Searle,et al.  Functional Aesthetics for Learning: Creative Tensions in Youth e-Textile Designs , 2012, ICLS.

[5]  David Gauntlett,et al.  Making is Connecting , 2011 .

[6]  Leah Buechley,et al.  A Construction Kit for Electronic Textiles , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[7]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  Digital Fabrication and Making' in Education: The Democratization of Invention , 2013 .

[8]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  A Clinical Interview for Assessing Student Learning in a University-Level Craft Technology Course , 2013 .

[9]  M. Girod,et al.  A Conceptual Overview of the Role of Beauty and Aesthetics in Science and Science Education , 2007 .

[10]  L. McCready.  Making Space for Diverse Masculinities , 2010 .

[11]  FisherAllan,et al.  Unlocking the clubhouse , 2002 .

[12]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Women and information technology , 1989 .

[13]  C. J. Pascoe.  Dude, You're a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School , 2007 .

[14]  Larry Cuban.  Teachers and machines : the classroom use of technology since 1920 , 1986 .

[15]  Annette Lareau,et al.  Moments of social inclusion and exclusion race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships , 1999 .

[16]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Inside the Black Box of Classroom Practice: Change Without Reform in American Education , 2013 .

[17]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[18]  A. Collins,et al.  Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America. Technology, Education--Connections (TEC) Series. , 2009 .

[19]  Yoshiaki Kushiki.  The Future of Embedded Software: Adapting to Drastic Change , 2010, Computer.

[20]  Patricia G. Lange,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media . , 2010 .

[21]  Kylie Peppler,et al.  Stitching Circuits: Learning About Circuitry Through E-textile Materials , 2013 .

[22]  Victoria Hand,et al.  From the Court to the Classroom: Opportunities for Engagement, Learning, and Identity in Basketball and Classroom Mathematics , 2008 .

[23]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  A Crafts-Oriented Approach to Computing in High School , 2014, ACM Trans. Comput. Educ..

[24]  Leah Buechley,et al.  Textile messages : dispatches from the world of e-textiles and education , 2013 .

[25]  Leah Buechley,et al.  LilyPad in the wild: how hardware's long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[26]  M. Rose.  Rethinking Remedial Education and the Academic-Vocational Divide , 2012 .

[27]  Lorelle L. Espinosa,et al.  Inside the Double Bind: A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate Women of Color in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics , 2011 .

[28]  L. Vygotsky.  Imagination and Creativity in Childhood , 2004 .

[29]  Jennifer Groff,et al.  Expanding Our “Frames” of Mind for Education and the Arts , 2013 .

[30]  J. Dewey.  Art as Experience , 1934 .

[31]  Edna Tan,et al.  Creating Hybrid Spaces for Engaging School Science Among Urban Middle School Girls , 2008 .

[32]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Ethnocomputing with electronic textiles: culturally responsive open design to broaden participation in computing in American indian youth and communities , 2014, SIGCSE.

[33]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Designing Digital Experiences for Positive Youth Development: From Playpen to Playground , 2012 .

[34]  Dale Dougherty,et al.  The Maker Mindset , 2013 .

[35]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  Making the Connections Visible: Crafting, Circuitry, and Coding in High School E-Textile , 2012 .

[36]  Leah Buechley,et al.  Questioning Invisibility , 2010, Computer.

[37]  Juan E. Gilbert,et al.  Toward culturally responsive computing education , 2013, CACM.

[38]  Peter Bøgh Andersen,et al.  A Mind at Work , 2003 .

[39]  Glynda Hull,et al.  Many versions of masculine : an exploration of boys' identity formation through digital storytelling in an afterschool program , 2006 .

[40]  W. Faulkner.  The Power and the Pleasure? A Research Agenda for “Making Gender Stick” to Engineers , 2000 .

[41]  M. Resnick,et al.  Beyond Black Boxes: Bringing Transparency and Aesthetics Back to Scientific Investigation , 2000 .

[42]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  Connected Play: Tweens in a Virtual World , 2013 .

[43]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns , 2008 .