Determination of energy efficiency for a direct methanol fuel cell stack by a fuel circulation method

Abstract A method of fuel circulation with a fixed amount of fuel was employed to investigate a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) stack that was built with metal foam flow fields for the air and fuel flows. The stack power output increases significantly with environmental temperature from 20 to 40 °C. The average peak power per cell at 40 °C is 26 mW cm−2 per cell. The average discharge voltage per cell at peak power does not change with temperature but remains at 0.3 V. The energy output of the stack was determined at constant current or constant voltage with a fixed amount of methanol to feed the anode of the stack until the fuel was consumed. The results by constant current discharge show that at higher temperature the stack has remarkably higher energy output; while at the same temperature only a suitable magnitude of discharge current can achieve the highest energy output. The results by constant voltage discharge show that the Faradic efficiency is 86%, and the energy efficiency is 17% at 30 °C.

[1]  C. Zawodzinski,et al.  Assessment of thermal nitridation to protect metal bipolar plates in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells , 2002 .

[2]  C. Pu,et al.  In Situ Fourier Transform Infrared‐Diffuse Reflection Spectroscopy of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Anodes and Cathodes , 1996 .

[3]  John Davey,et al.  Recent advances in direct methanol fuel cells at Los Alamos National Laboratory , 2000 .

[4]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  High performance direct methanol polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 1996 .

[5]  Keith Scott,et al.  Electrochemical and gas evolution characteristics of direct methanol fuel cells with stainless steel mesh flow beds , 2001 .

[6]  Rongzhong Jiang,et al.  Stack design and performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells , 2001 .

[7]  Subbarao Surampudi,et al.  Advances in direct oxidation methanol fuel cells , 1994 .

[8]  R. Hornung,et al.  Bipolar plate materials development using Fe-based alloys for solid polymer fuel cells , 1998 .

[9]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  Direct methanol fuel cells: progress in cell performance and cathode research , 2002 .

[10]  Antonino S. Aricò,et al.  DMFCs: From Fundamental Aspects to Technology Development , 2001 .

[11]  J. Wind,et al.  Metallic bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells , 2002 .

[12]  Ramana G. Reddy,et al.  Modeling of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell with metal foam in the flow-field of the bipolar/end plates , 2003 .

[13]  J. Scholta,et al.  Investigations on novel low-cost graphite composite bipolar plates , 1999 .

[14]  R. Savinell,et al.  A direct methanol fuel cell using acid-doped polybenzimidazole as polymer electrolyte , 1996 .

[15]  P. Adcock,et al.  Stainless steel as a bipolar plate material for solid polymer fuel cells , 2000 .

[16]  Paul Leonard Adcock,et al.  Bipolar plate materials for solid polymer fuel cells , 2000 .

[17]  D. Chu,et al.  Methanol Electro‐oxidation on Unsupported Pt‐Ru Alloys at Different Temperatures , 1996 .

[18]  Theodore M. Besmann,et al.  Carbon/Carbon Composite Bipolar Plate for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells , 2000 .

[19]  S. Narayanan,et al.  Performance of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells with Sputter‐Deposited Anode Catalyst Layers , 1999 .