A PAM50-Based Chemoendocrine Score for Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer with an Intermediate Risk of Relapse

Purpose: Hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer is clinically and biologically heterogeneous, and subgroups with different prognostic and treatment sensitivities need to be identified. Experimental Design: Research-based PAM50 subtyping and expression of additional genes was performed on 63 patients with HR+/HER2− disease randomly assigned to neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy in a phase II trial. The biology associated with treatment response was used to derive a PAM50-based chemoendocrine score (CES). CES's predictive ability was evaluated in 4 independent neoadjuvant data sets (n = 675) and 4 adjuvant data sets (n = 1,505). The association of CES, intrinsic biology, and PAM50 risk of relapse (ROR) was explored across 6,007 tumors. Results: Most genes associated with endocrine sensitivity were also found associated with chemotherapy resistance. In the chemotherapy test/validation data sets, CES was independently associated with pathologic complete response (pCR), even after adjusting for intrinsic subtype. pCR rates of the CES endocrine–sensitive (CES-E), uncertain (CES-U), and chemotherapy-sensitive (CES-C) groups in both data sets combined were 25%, 11%, and 2%, respectively. In the endocrine test/validation data sets, CES was independently associated with response. Compared with ROR, >90% of ROR-low and ROR-high tumors were identified as CES-E and CES-C, respectively; however, each CES group represented >25% of ROR-intermediate disease. In terms of survival outcome, CES-C was associated with poor relapse-free survival in patients with ROR-intermediate disease treated with either adjuvant endocrine therapy only or no adjuvant systemic therapy, but not in patients treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: CES is a genomic signature capable of estimating chemoendocrine sensitivity in HR+ breast cancer beyond intrinsic subtype and risk of relapse. Clin Cancer Res; 23(12); 3035–44. ©2016 AACR.

[1]  Ian Krop,et al.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  R. Bast,et al.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Charles M. Perou,et al.  Response and survival of breast cancer intrinsic subtypes following multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[4]  R. Price,et al.  Artemether-lumefantrine treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of day 7 lumefantrine concentrations and therapeutic response using individual patient data , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[5]  S. Ferree,et al.  Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Core Needle Biopsy Samples with the Prosigna Assay , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Accurate Prediction and Validation of Response to Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  G. Collins,et al.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement , 2015, BMC medicine.

[8]  Christos Sotiriou,et al.  Luminal B breast cancer: molecular characterization, clinical management, and future perspectives. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  E Mardis,et al.  Predicting response and survival in chemotherapy-treated triple-negative breast cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  C. Perou,et al.  Molecular Features and Survival Outcomes of the Intrinsic Subtypes Within HER2-Positive Breast Cancer , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  Gideon Blumenthal,et al.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[12]  C. Perou,et al.  Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013 , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  C. Perou,et al.  Predicting Drug Responsiveness in Human Cancers Using Genetically Engineered Mice , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  Donald A. Berry,et al.  PAM50 proliferation score as a predictor of weekly paclitaxel benefit in breast cancer , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[15]  L. Pusztai,et al.  Biomarker Analysis of Neoadjuvant Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide Followed by Ixabepilone or Paclitaxel in Early-Stage Breast Cancer , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  C. Perou,et al.  Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[18]  J. Albanell,et al.  Chemotherapy (CT) and hormonotherapy (HT) as neoadjuvant treatment in luminal breast cancer patients: results from the GEICAM/2006-03, a multicenter, randomized, phase-II study. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[20]  C. Fan,et al.  PAM50 assay and the three-gene model for identifying the major and clinically relevant molecular subtypes of breast cancer , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[21]  P. Fasching,et al.  Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  C. Fan,et al.  Concordance among gene expression-based predictors for ER-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[23]  F. Markowetz,et al.  The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups , 2012, Nature.

[24]  Charles M. Perou,et al.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[25]  C. Perou,et al.  Association between breast cancer subtypes and response to neoadjuvant anastrozole , 2011, Steroids.

[26]  J. Olson,et al.  Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype--ACOSOG Z1031. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  L. Esserman,et al.  A genomic predictor of response and survival following taxane-anthracycline chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer. , 2011, JAMA.

[28]  Charles M. Perou,et al.  Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer , 2010, Molecular oncology.

[29]  Yufeng Liu,et al.  Building prognostic models for breast cancer patients using clinical variables and hundreds of gene expression signatures , 2011, BMC Medical Genomics.

[30]  Jie Chen,et al.  Gene expression in cardiac tissues from infants with idiopathic conotruncal defects , 2011, BMC Medical Genomics.

[31]  Peter Regitnig,et al.  Genomic index of sensitivity to endocrine therapy for breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Mark T. W. Ebbert,et al.  A Comparison of PAM50 Intrinsic Subtyping with Immunohistochemistry and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Tamoxifen-Treated Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[33]  C. Perou,et al.  Relationship between plasma estradiol levels and estrogen-responsive gene expression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  A. Nobel,et al.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  Jennifer L. Osborn,et al.  Direct multiplexed measurement of gene expression with color-coded probe pairs , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  M. Dowsett,et al.  A phase II placebo-controlled trial of neoadjuvant anastrozole alone or with gefitinib in early breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Microtubule-Associated Protein-tau is a Bifunctional Predictor of Endocrine Sensitivity and Chemotherapy Resistance in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[38]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[39]  M. Cronin,et al.  Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  A. Nobel,et al.  Concordance among Gene-Expression – Based Predictors for Breast Cancer , 2011 .

[41]  M. Cronin,et al.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  A. Hutcheon,et al.  A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. , 2003, Breast.

[43]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery , 2003, Genome Biology.

[44]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[45]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.