Coma Outcome Prediction Using Event-Related Potentials: P3 and Mismatch Negativity

The prediction of the outcome from coma is of considerable importance to the patients, their relatives and attendant medical staff, and yet current clinical methods lack sensitivity and specificity. Objective investigations can enhance the accuracy of such predictions and are an important adjuvant when reaching decisions to continue or terminate life support. Of the neurophysiological methods available, electroencephalography and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials have proved the most useful in the clinical setting. These tests are good predictors of an adverse outcome; however, they tell us only about the ongoing cerebral activity and integrity of the primary somatosensory pathways, respectively. The presence of long-latency event-related potentials has been shown to be a useful predictor of a favourable neurological outcome, and thus their use complements other neurophysiological techniques. Their potential application in clinical practice is reviewed.

[1]  M. Stokes,et al.  Auditory evoked potentials to spectro-temporal modulation of complex tones in normal subjects and patients with severe brain injury. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  D Morlet,et al.  Mismatch negativity and late auditory evoked potentials in comatose patients , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Guérit,et al.  ERPs obtained with the auditory oddball paradigm in coma and altered states of consciousness: clinical relationships, prognostic value, and origin of components , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  A. Amar Coma and Impaired Consciousness: A Clinical Perspective , 1999 .

[5]  S. Orkun,et al.  Postacute predictors of functional and cognitive progress in traumatic brain injury: somatosensory evoked potentials. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Z. Groswasser,et al.  Event-Related Potentials as an Index of Cognitive Function during Recovery from Severe Closed Head Injury , 1998, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[7]  K. Chiappa,et al.  Evaluation and prognostication in coma. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  E. Halgren,et al.  Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  Charles D. Yingling,et al.  Auditory P3 Responses to Name Stimuli , 1997, Brain and Language.

[10]  J D Frost,et al.  IFCN recommended standards for electrophysiologic monitoring in comatose and other unresponsive states. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  H Pratt,et al.  P300 in response to the subject's own name. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  F. Angeleri,et al.  Eliciting P300 in comatose patients , 1995, The Lancet.

[13]  A. Rabinowicz,et al.  Predictive value of P300 event‐related potentials compared with EEG and somatosensory evoked potentials in non‐traumatic coma , 1993, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica.

[14]  S. R. Butler,et al.  Electrophysiological indicator of awakening from coma , 1993, The Lancet.

[15]  C. Yingling,et al.  P300 as a predictor of recovery from coma , 1990, The Lancet.

[16]  J. Lockrem Recommendations for intensive care unit admission and discharge criteria. , 1989, Critical care medicine.

[17]  H. Kamphuisen,et al.  Topographic Brain Mapping of EEG and Evoked Potentials , 1989, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[18]  D N Brooks,et al.  Event related potentials from closed head injury patients in an auditory "oddball" task: evidence of dysfunction in stimulus categorisation. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  D. Zerbin,et al.  Evoked potential assessment of mental function during recovery from severe head injury. , 1986, Surgical neurology.

[20]  M. Rappaport Brain evoked potentials in coma and the vegetative state , 1986 .

[21]  F E Bloom,et al.  P300 latency reflects the degree of cognitive decline in dementing illness. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Clinical relevance of long-latency SEPs and VEPs during coma and emergence from coma. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  A. Papanicolaou,et al.  Evoked potential correlates of posttraumatic amnesia after closed head injury. , 1984, Neurosurgery.

[24]  G G Enas,et al.  Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury. A comparative analysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials, CT scanning, and intracranial pressure. , 1981, Journal of neurosurgery.

[25]  S. Berrol,et al.  Evoked brain potentials and disability in brain-damaged patients. , 1977, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  J. Miller,et al.  Evaluation of brain function in severe human head trauma with multimodality evoked potentials. Part 1: Evoked brain-injury potentials, methods, and analysis. , 1977, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  O. Keren,et al.  Follow-up studies of somatosensory evoked potentials and auditory brainstem evoked potentials in patients with post-coma unawareness (PCU) of traumatic brain injury. , 1994, Brain injury.

[28]  G. Geffen,et al.  Event-related potential measurement of deficits in information processing following moderate to severe closed head injury. , 1992, Brain injury.

[29]  M. Rappaport,et al.  Passive P300 response in traumatic brain injury patients. , 1991, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[30]  Y. Katayama,et al.  Transient suppression of event-related evoked potentials produced by mild head injury in the cat. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[31]  S. Curry Event-related potentials as indicants of structural and functional damage in closed head injury. , 1980, Progress in brain research.