A Bayesian framework for the analysis of systems biology models of the brain

Systems biology models are used to understand complex biological and physiological systems. Interpretation of these models is an important part of developing this understanding. These models are often fit to experimental data in order to understand how the system has produced various phenomena or behaviour that are seen in the data. In this paper, we have outlined a framework that can be used to perform Bayesian analysis of complex systems biology models. In particular, we have focussed on analysing a systems biology of the brain using both simulated and measured data. By using a combination of sensitivity analysis and approximate Bayesian computation, we have shown that it is possible to obtain distributions of parameters that can better guard against misinterpretation of results, as compared to a maximum likelihood estimate based approach. This is done through analysis of simulated and experimental data. NIRS measurements were simulated using the same simulated systemic input data for the model in a ‘healthy’ and ‘impaired’ state. By analysing both of these datasets, we show that different parameter spaces can be distinguished and compared between different physiological states or conditions. Finally, we analyse experimental data using the new Bayesian framework and the previous maximum likelihood estimate approach, showing that the Bayesian approach provides a more complete understanding of the parameter space.

[1]  Sergio Fantini,et al.  Practical steps for applying a new dynamic model to near-infrared spectroscopy measurements of hemodynamic oscillations and transient changes: implications for cerebrovascular and functional brain studies. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[2]  David Welch,et al.  Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  Luís N. Vicente,et al.  PSwarm: a hybrid solver for linearly constrained global derivative-free optimization , 2009, Optim. Methods Softw..

[4]  Chris P. Barnes,et al.  Mechanistic Modelling and Bayesian Inference Elucidates the Variable Dynamics of Double-Strand Break Repair , 2016, bioRxiv.

[5]  S. Moolgavkar,et al.  A Method for Computing Profile-Likelihood- Based Confidence Intervals , 1988 .

[6]  Oscar L Lopez,et al.  Review of 'the potential role of arterial stiffness in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease'. , 2015, Neurodegenerative disease management.

[7]  M. Ursino,et al.  Interaction among autoregulation , CO 2 reactivity , and intracranial pressure : a mathematical model , 1998 .

[8]  Clare E. Elwell,et al.  A Model of Brain Circulation and Metabolism: NIRS Signal Changes during Physiological Challenges , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  O. Cappé,et al.  Population Monte Carlo , 2004 .

[10]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice , 2002 .

[11]  Jun S. Liu,et al.  Bayesian Methods in Biological Sequence Analysis , 2004 .

[12]  Gemma Bale,et al.  Oxygen dependency of mitochondrial metabolism indicates outcome of newborn brain injury , 2018, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[13]  J. Banga,et al.  Structural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods , 2011, PloS one.

[14]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Nicola J. Robertson,et al.  Computational modelling of the piglet brain to simulate near-infrared spectroscopy and magnetic resonance spectroscopy data collected during oxygen deprivation , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  E. Hairer,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II: Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems , 2010 .

[17]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[18]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Sloppy models, parameter uncertainty, and the role of experimental design. , 2010, Molecular bioSystems.

[19]  Piotr Orlowski,et al.  A Mathematical Model of Cellular Metabolism During Ischemic Stroke and Hypothermia , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  Robert Costalat,et al.  A Model of the Coupling between Brain Electrical Activity, Metabolism, and Hemodynamics: Application to the Interpretation of Functional Neuroimaging , 2002, NeuroImage.

[22]  Eva Balsa-Canto,et al.  On the relationship between sloppiness and identifiability. , 2016, Mathematical biosciences.

[23]  G. Casella,et al.  Explaining the Gibbs Sampler , 1992 .

[24]  Yiannis Ventikos,et al.  Modelling of the physiological response of the brain to ischaemic stroke , 2013, Interface Focus.

[25]  M. Feldman,et al.  Population growth of human Y chromosomes: a study of Y chromosome microsatellites. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  L. Tierney Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions , 1994 .

[27]  Matthew Caldwell,et al.  Modelling Blood Flow and Metabolism in the Preclinical Neonatal Brain during and Following Hypoxic-Ischaemia , 2015, PloS one.

[28]  Matthew Caldwell,et al.  BrainSignals Revisited: Simplifying a Computational Model of Cerebral Physiology , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  K. S. Brown,et al.  Statistical mechanical approaches to models with many poorly known parameters. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Darren J. Wilkinson,et al.  Bayesian methods in bioinformatics and computational systems biology , 2006, Briefings Bioinform..

[31]  Matthew Caldwell,et al.  Modelling confounding effects from extracerebral contamination and systemic factors on functional near-infrared spectroscopy , 2016, NeuroImage.

[32]  H. Kitano,et al.  Computational systems biology , 2002, Nature.

[33]  Paul Marjoram,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Ilias Tachtsidis,et al.  A physiological model of cerebral blood flow control. , 2005, Mathematical biosciences.

[35]  Michael L. Waskom,et al.  mwaskom/seaborn: v0.9.0 (July 2018) , 2018 .

[36]  Mark M. Tanaka,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo without likelihoods , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Z. Q. John Lu Bayesian Inference for Gene Expression and Proteomics , 2007 .

[38]  Richard J. Morris,et al.  Bayesian Model Comparison and Parameter Inference in Systems Biology Using Nested Sampling , 2014, PloS one.

[39]  Sergio Fantini,et al.  Validation of a novel hemodynamic model for coherent hemodynamics spectroscopy (CHS) and functional brain studies with fNIRS and fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[40]  Ilias Tachtsidis,et al.  Near-infrared spectroscopic quantification of changes in the concentration of oxidized cytochrome c oxidase in the healthy human brain during hypoxemia. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[41]  Xin Liu,et al.  Parameter Estimation in Computational Biology by Approximate Bayesian Computation coupled with Sensitivity Analysis , 2017, 1704.09021.

[42]  M. Ursino,et al.  Interaction among autoregulation, CO2 reactivity, and intracranial pressure: a mathematical model. , 1998, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[43]  Gemma Bale,et al.  Pressure passivity of cerebral mitochondrial metabolism is associated with poor outcome following perinatal hypoxic ischemic brain injury , 2017, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[44]  Chris P. Barnes,et al.  A Statistical Approach Reveals Designs for the Most Robust Stochastic Gene Oscillators , 2015, bioRxiv.

[45]  Sergio Fantini,et al.  A new hemodynamic model shows that temporal perturbations of cerebral blood flow and metabolic rate of oxygen cannot be measured individually using functional near-infrared spectroscopy , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[46]  Sergio Fantini,et al.  A haemodynamic model for the physiological interpretation of in vivo measurements of the concentration and oxygen saturation of haemoglobin. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  M. Dahlui,et al.  Risk and Protective Factors for Cigarette Use in Young Adolescents in a School Setting: What Could Be Done Better? , 2015, PloS one.