The Effects of Information Systems Compatibility on Firm Performance following Mergers and Acquisitions

This study investigates the consequences of information systems compatibility between the target and acquirer firms in the context of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Using a unique data set of ERP implementations, we find that acquirers using the same ERP vendor as their targets exhibit shorter post-merger operating cycles and shorter post-merger audit delays relative to acquirers with different ERP vendors than their targets. In supplemental analysis, we find evidence that acquirers with the same ERP vendor as their target also exhibit more accurate management forecast guidance following the acquisition. The findings of this study should be of interest to capital market participants and managers involved in M&A activity by providing evidence about how the degree of compatibility between acquirer and target ERP systems impacts post-merger activities across different economically significant functional areas.

[1]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[2]  John J. Willingham,et al.  An Empirical-Analysis Of Audit Delay , 1987 .

[3]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Integrating information technology divisions in a bank merger Fit, compatibility and models of change , 1996, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Antonis C. Stylianou,et al.  Corporate mergers and the problems of IS integration , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Douglas J. Skinner Earnings Disclosures and Stockholder Lawsuits , 1997 .

[6]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[7]  Prasad Bingi,et al.  Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation , 1999, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[8]  Prasad Bingi,et al.  Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation : Entreprise computing , 1999 .

[9]  Toby J. Tetenbaum Seven key practices that improve the chance for expected integration and synergies , 1999 .

[10]  Antonis C. Stylianou,et al.  Post-merger systems integration: the impact on IS capabilities , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[11]  D. Truex ERP Systems as Facilitating and Confounding factors in Corporate Mergers: the case of two Canadian telecommunications companies , 2001 .

[12]  L. N. Higgins,et al.  IS integration: Your most critical M&A challenge? , 2002 .

[13]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Henock Louis Earnings Management and the Market Performance of Acquiring Firms , 2002 .

[15]  L. Capron,et al.  When do acquirers earn abnormal returns , 2002 .

[16]  Jeffry Netter,et al.  What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions , 2002 .

[17]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  The Value Relevance of Announcements of Transformational Information Technology Investments , 2003, MIS Q..

[18]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers , 2004 .

[19]  P. Weetman,et al.  Determinants of Audit Report Lag: Some Evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange , 2005 .

[20]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms , 2005, MIS Q..

[21]  N. Vafeas,et al.  The Association between Corporate Boards, Audit Committees, and Management Earnings Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis , 2005 .

[22]  Jesse F. Dillard,et al.  Enterprise resource planning systems: A physical manifestation of administrative evil , 2005, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems.

[23]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Is Speed of Integration really a Success Factor of Mergers and Acquisitions? : An Analysis of the Role of Internal and External Relatedness , 2006 .

[24]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  ERP Investments and the Market Value of Firms: Toward an Understanding of Influential ERP Project Variables , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Michael L. Ettredge,et al.  The Impact of SOX Section 404 Internal Control Quality Assessment on Audit Delay in the SOX Era , 2006 .

[26]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Performance Effects of Information Technology Synergies in Multibusiness Firms , 2006, MIS Q..

[27]  S. Fienberg Privacy and Confidentiality in an e-Commerce World: Data Mining, Data Warehousing, Matching and Disclosure Limitation , 2006, math/0609288.

[28]  Marcia L. Weidenmier,et al.  Research Opportunities in Information Technology and Internal Auditing , 2006, J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  J. McKay,et al.  ERP: more than just a system: the role of ERP in mergers and acquisitions , 2007 .

[30]  Weili Ge,et al.  Accruals Quality and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting , 2007 .

[31]  Joseph F. Brazel,et al.  The Effect of ERP System Implementations on the Management of Earnings and Earnings Release Dates , 2008, J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Integration of Different ERP Systems: The Case of Mergers and Acquisitions , 2008, PACIS.

[33]  Anders Haug,et al.  A classification model of ERP system data quality , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[34]  S. Sutton,et al.  The Pervasive Nature of IT Controls: An Examination of Material Weaknesses in IT Controls and Audit Fees , 2009 .

[35]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Cross-Business Information Technology Integration and Acquirer Value Creation in Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Implementing enterprise resource planning systems: organizational performance and the duration of the implementation , 2011, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[37]  Ye Cai,et al.  Board Connections and M&A Transactions , 2011 .

[38]  Jere R. Francis,et al.  Selection models in accounting research , 2012 .

[39]  Nickolaos G. Tzeremes,et al.  Estimating the degree of operating efficiency gains from a potential bank merger and acquisition: A DEA bootstrapped approach , 2013 .

[40]  Anup Agrawal,et al.  Common Advisers in Mergers and Acquisitions: Determinants and Consequences , 2013, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[41]  Stefan Henningsson,et al.  An introspection for the field of IS integration challenges in M&A , 2013, AMCIS.

[42]  S. Sutton,et al.  The pervasive nature of IT controls , 2013 .

[43]  Stefan Henningsson,et al.  "Ready to Acquire": The IT Resources Required for a Growth-by-Acquisition Business Strategy , 2013, MIS Q. Executive.

[44]  Q. Cheng,et al.  Managerial Incentives and Management Forecast Precision , 2013 .

[45]  James D. Whitworth,et al.  Office-Level Characteristics of the Big 4 and Audit Report Timeliness , 2014 .

[46]  Jong Chool Park,et al.  Common Auditors in M&A Transactions , 2015 .

[47]  Lubomir P. Litov,et al.  Shared Auditors in Mergers and Acquisitions , 2014 .

[48]  G. R. Young,et al.  The Relationship between Board-Level Technology Committees and Reported Security Breaches , 2016, J. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Quinn Thomas Swanquist,et al.  Propensity Score Matching in Accounting Research , 2017 .

[50]  Julia L. Higgs,et al.  Do Auditors Price Breach Risk in Their Audit Fees? , 2018, J. Inf. Syst..