Hemispheric differences in VEPs to lateralised stimuli are a marker of recovery from neglect

Visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in seventeen patients with unilateral lesions of the right hemisphere (RH) and visuospatial neglect. Hemispheric differences were detected for VEP components in the time window from 130 to 280 msec; this result replicates data from a previous study using a larger group of patients (Di Russo et al., 2008). Three patients were tested twice; their hemispheric differences, i.e., the differences in latency and amplitude of VEPs to ipsilesional and contralesional stimuli, were evaluated at the beginning and end of visuospatial rehabilitation training for neglect. The hemispheric differences were limited to components anterior N1 (N1a), posterior N1 (N1p) and P2 (not C1 and P1) and showed a significant decrease after training; amelioration at the behavioural level was also observed. Fourteen patients were tested only once, at different steps of their training. For the overall group, we determined the correlation between VEP hemispheric differences and the number of sessions attended by the patients at the time of VEP recording. The correlation was negative, the higher the number of sessions, the lower the hemispheric asymmetry, and high, ranging from .45 to .64, for both the latency and amplitude of the N1p and P2 components, and for the amplitude of the N1a component. The correlation between VEP hemispheric differences and time from onset (TFO) of the pathological event was not significant. Overall, the hemispheric differences between specific components of the VEP responses to lateralised stimuli appear to be a good marker of recovery from neglect.

[1]  Lamme Vaf,et al.  Why visual attention and awareness are different , 2003 .

[2]  A. Cantagallo,et al.  Selective and integrated rehabilitation programs for disturbances of visual/spatial attention and executive function after brain damage: a neuropsychological evidence-based review. , 2011, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[3]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[4]  R. Teasell,et al.  Treatment of Visual Perceptual Disorders Post Stroke , 2003, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[5]  A. Sillito,et al.  Always returning: feedback and sensory processing in visual cortex and thalamus , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  M. Faust,et al.  Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al.'s (2000, 2005) systematic reviews. , 2009, Neuropsychology.

[7]  Armin Schnider,et al.  The Dorsal Attention Network Mediates Orienting toward Behaviorally Relevant Stimuli in Spatial Neglect , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Spatial neglect and attention networks. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP , 2005, NeuroImage.

[10]  Richard B Buxton,et al.  Putting spatial attention on the map: timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas , 2001, Vision Research.

[11]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  A Behavioral Analysis of Spatial Neglect and its Recovery After Stroke , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  B. Hill,et al.  Assessment and rehabilitation of acquired visuospatial and proprioceptive deficits associated with visuospatial neglect. , 2009, NeuroRehabilitation.

[13]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  Development of a rehabilitative program for unilateral neglect. , 2006, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[15]  V. Lamme.  Towards a true neural stance on consciousness , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  S. Paolucci,et al.  Effectiveness of neglect rehabilitation in a randomized group study. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[17]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage. , 1992, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[18]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Patterns of spontaneous recovery of neglect and associated disorders in acute right brain-damaged patients , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[19]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  Toward a comprehensive diagnosis of visual-spatial disorders in unilateral brain damaged patients. , 1989 .

[20]  J. M. Hupé,et al.  Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons , 1998, Nature.

[21]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  H. Duffau,et al.  Direct Evidence for a Parietal-Frontal Pathway Subserving Spatial Awareness in Humans , 2005, Science.

[23]  A. Maravita,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Conscious Vision: Evidence from Unilateral Extinction , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Danckert,et al.  Through a prism darkly: re-evaluating prisms and neglect , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Breakdown of Functional Connectivity in Frontoparietal Networks Underlies Behavioral Deficits in Spatial Neglect , 2007, Neuron.

[26]  D. Perani,et al.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Umberto Sabatini,et al.  Neural bases of personal and extrapersonal neglect in humans. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Sylvie Chokron,et al.  The Role of Vision in Spatial Representation , 2004, Cortex.

[29]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of common-onset visual masking , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[32]  C. Weiller,et al.  Acute visual neglect and extinction: distinct functional state of the visuospatial attention system. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  Left unilateral neglect as a disconnection syndrome. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al.  Feedforward and Recurrent Processing in Scene Segmentation: Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Joanne Azulay,et al.  Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal brain mapping of spatial attention effects on pattern‐reversal ERPs , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[37]  Caspar M. Schwiedrzik,et al.  Expectations Change the Signatures and Timing of Electrophysiological Correlates of Perceptual Awareness , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.