Acute effects of multisite left ventricular pacing on mechanical dyssynchrony in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND A novel quadripolar left ventricular (LV) pacing lead has the ability to deliver multisite LV pacing (MSLV). We set out to characterize the safety and changes in acute mechanical dyssynchrony with MSLV in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Prospective multicenter study in 52 patients receiving CRT. An acute pacing protocol comprising 8 MSLV configurations covering a range of delays was compared with conventional CRT (baseline). Transthoracic tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was used to measure the standard deviation of time to peak contraction of 12 LV segments (Ts-SD) and delayed longitudinal contraction. No ventricular arrhythmia occurred in any of the 52 patients. Complete TDI datasets were collected in 41 patients. Compared with baseline: 1) The mean Ts-SD was significantly lower for the optimal MSLV configuration (35.3 ± 36.4 vs 50.2 ± 29.1 ms; P < .001); 2) at least 1 MSLV configuration exhibited a significant dyssynchrony improvement in 63% of patients; and 3) the mean number of LV segments with delayed longitudinal contractions was significantly reduced with the optimal MSLV configuration (0.37 ± 7.99 vs 2.20 ± 0.19; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Acute MSLV was acutely safe, and a proportion of MSLV vectors resulted in a significant reduction in echocardiographic dyssynchrony compared with conventional CRT.

[1]  P. Khairy,et al.  Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  A. Natale,et al.  Impact of previous myocardial infarction on outcomes of CRT patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. Results from a multicentric prospective study. , 2012, International journal of cardiology.

[3]  G. Boriani,et al.  First prospective, multi-centre clinical experience with a novel left ventricular quadripolar lead. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Left Ventricular Resynchronization Is Mandatory for Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Analysis in Patients With Echocardiographic Evidence of Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony at Baseline , 2007, Circulation.

[5]  Milton Packer,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Thomas Lavergne,et al.  Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay , 2001 .

[7]  D. DeMets,et al.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  M. Zembala,et al.  Triple‐Site Versus Standard Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Study (TRUST CRT): Clinical Rationale, Design, and Implementation , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) Trial , 2008, Circulation.

[10]  D. Delurgio,et al.  Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Left Ventricular Size and Function in Chronic Heart Failure , 2003, Circulation.

[11]  A. Natale,et al.  Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[12]  Chu-Pak Lau,et al.  Predictors of left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  A randomized comparison of triple-site versus dual-site ventricular stimulation in patients with congestive heart failure. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  D. Delurgio,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Peter Søgaard,et al.  Tissue Doppler imaging predicts improved systolic performance and reversed left ventricular remodeling during long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  J. Oh,et al.  Measurement of cardiac time intervals by Doppler tissue M-mode imaging of the anterior mitral leaflet. , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[17]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Combined longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony predicts ventricular response after resynchronization therapy. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Maxime Cannesson,et al.  Novel Speckle-Tracking Radial Strain From Routine Black-and-White Echocardiographic Images to Quantify Dyssynchrony and Predict Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2006, Circulation.

[19]  K. Rhode,et al.  Multi-site left ventricular pacing as a potential treatment for patients with postero-lateral scar: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and invasive haemodynamic assessment. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  F. Romeo,et al.  Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes. , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[21]  K. Baughman,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization and death from progressive heart failure. a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials☆ , 2003 .