Robust detection of heartbeats using association models from blood pressure and EEG signals

BackgroundsThe heartbeat is fundamental cardiac activity which is straightforwardly detected with a variety of measurement techniques for analyzing physiological signals. Unfortunately, unexpected noise or contaminated signals can distort or cut out electrocardiogram (ECG) signals in practice, misleading the heartbeat detectors to report a false heart rate or suspend itself for a considerable length of time in the worst case. To deal with the problem of unreliable heartbeat detection, PhysioNet/CinC suggests a challenge in 2014 for developing robust heart beat detectors using multimodal signals.MethodsThis article proposes a multimodal data association method that supplements ECG as a primary input signal with blood pressure (BP) and electroencephalogram (EEG) as complementary input signals when input signals are unreliable. If the current signal quality index (SQI) qualifies ECG as a reliable input signal, our method applies QRS detection to ECG and reports heartbeats. Otherwise, the current SQI selects the best supplementary input signal between BP and EEG after evaluating the current SQI of BP. When BP is chosen as a supplementary input signal, our association model between ECG and BP enables us to compute their regular intervals, detect characteristics BP signals, and estimate the locations of the heartbeat. When both ECG and BP are not qualified, our fusion method resorts to the association model between ECG and EEG that allows us to apply an adaptive filter to ECG and EEG, extract the QRS candidates, and report heartbeats.ResultsThe proposed method achieved an overall score of 86.26 % for the test data when the input signals are unreliable. Our method outperformed the traditional method, which achieved 79.28 % using QRS detector and BP detector from PhysioNet. Our multimodal signal processing method outperforms the conventional unimodal method of taking ECG signals alone for both training and test data sets.Conclusions To detect the heartbeat robustly, we have proposed a novel multimodal data association method of supplementing ECG with a variety of physiological signals and accounting for the patient-specific lag between different pulsatile signals and ECG. Multimodal signal detectors and data-fusion approaches such as those proposed in this article can reduce false alarms and improve patient monitoring.

[1]  T. Dutoit,et al.  Removal of ECG artifacts from EEG using a modified independent component analysis approach , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  R. Oweis,et al.  QRS Detection and Heart Rate Variability Analysis: A Survey , 2014 .

[3]  Yong Bai,et al.  Multimodal information fusion for robust heart beat detection , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[4]  Urska Pangerc,et al.  Robust detection of heart beats in multimodal data using integer multiplier digital filters and morphological algorithms , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[5]  Ikaro Silva,et al.  Robust detection of heart beats in multimodal data , 2015, Physiological measurement.

[6]  Eric Laciar Leber,et al.  Noise Removal from EEG Signals in Polisomnographic Records Applying Adaptive Filters in Cascade , 2011 .

[7]  M. Imhoff,et al.  Alarm Algorithms in Critical Care Monitoring , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  M. Chambrin Alarms in the intensive care unit: how can the number of false alarms be reduced? , 2001, Critical care.

[9]  R. Orglmeister,et al.  The principles of software QRS detection , 2002, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[10]  N. Thakor,et al.  Removal of ECG interference from the EEG recordings in small animals using independent component analysis , 2001, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  José Vicente,et al.  Robust algorithm to locate heart beats from multiple physiological waveforms by individual signal detector voting , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[12]  Juan Pablo Martínez,et al.  QRS detectors performance comparison in public databases , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[13]  R.G. Mark,et al.  A signal abnormality index for arterial blood pressure waveforms , 2006, 2006 Computers in Cardiology.

[14]  P. Laguna,et al.  Evaluation of a wavelet-based ECG waveform detector on the QT database , 2000, Computers in Cardiology 2000. Vol.27 (Cat. 00CH37163).

[15]  Fernando Andreotti,et al.  R-peak estimation using multimodal lead switching , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[16]  Pavel Jurák,et al.  Robust multichannel QRS detection , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[17]  Balázs Benyó,et al.  An open architecture patient monitoring system using standard technologies , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[18]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  J-P Lanquart,et al.  QRS artifact elimination on full night sleep EEG. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  Chi-Sang Poon,et al.  Analysis of First-Derivative Based QRS Detection Algorithms , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Heart beat detection in multimodal data using signal recognition and beat location estimation , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[22]  R G Mark,et al.  Robust heart rate estimation from multiple asynchronous noisy sources using signal quality indices and a Kalman filter , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[23]  G D Clifford,et al.  Signal quality indices and data fusion for determining clinical acceptability of electrocardiograms , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[24]  Marcus Vollmer,et al.  Robust detection of heart beats using dynamic thresholds and moving windows , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.