Improved model-based control of a six-degree-of-freedom Stewart platform driven by permanent magnet synchronous motors

– The precise control and dynamic analysis of the electrical Stewart platform have not been so well treated in the literature. This paper aims to design a novel model‐based controller to improve the tracing performance of the electrical Stewart platform. Moreover, the simulations under uncertain environments are used to verify the robustness of the controller., – In the electrical Stewart platform, there exist two special movements of the motor systems: motor systems' movement with the actuators and meanwhile the rotors and snails' rotation around their axis. The Kane equation is used to compute the driven torque of the movements of motor systems, actuators and movable platform. The improved dynamic models of the electrical Stewart platform which consider the motor systems and actuators' influences are used to design the novel controller. The PID controller and the simple model‐based controller are also developed to compare with the novel one. Moreover, the robustness of the controller is verified by the platform friction and the parameters uncertainty., – Simulation results show that the novel model‐based controller can gain a better tracing performance than the PID controller and even the simple model‐based controller. Under the environments of the platform with friction and 5% parameters variety, the tracing performance of the novel controller is also satisfactory, which verifies the robustness of the controller. Most importantly, the novel model‐based controller can be used in a higher precision control demand and a more complicated environment., – The main contribution of this paper is to derive a novel model‐based controller considering the motor systems' influence, which enhances the robustness of the controller. To the authors' best knowledge, such a framework for the improved model based controller has not been well treated in the past literature. The conventional PID controller and a simple model‐based controller are also built to verify the advantages of the improved model‐based controller.

[1]  Bhaskar Dasgupta,et al.  A Newton-Euler Formulation for the Inverse Dynamics of the Stewart Platform Manipulator , 1998 .

[2]  Tielong Shen,et al.  Nonlinear Robust Link Space Control for an Electrical Stewart Platform , 2006, 2006 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[3]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Dynamic modeling of a 6-degree-of-freedom Stewart platform driven by a permanent magnet synchronous motor , 2009, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C.

[4]  Jun Wu,et al.  Simplified strategy of the dynamic model of a 6-UPS parallel kinematic machine for real-time control , 2007 .

[5]  Chul-Goo Kang Closed-form force sensing of a 6-axis force transducer based on the Stewart platform , 2001 .

[6]  V. E. Gough,et al.  Front Suspension and Tyre Wear , 1955 .

[7]  Leonard S. Haynes,et al.  On the dynamic model and kinematic analysis of a class of Stewart platforms , 1992, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  Bhaskar Dasgupta,et al.  The Stewart platform manipulator: a review , 2000 .

[9]  Chong-Won Lee,et al.  High speed tracking control of Stewart platform manipulator via enhanced sliding mode control , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[10]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Adaptive Sliding Mode Fault-Tolerant Control of the Uncertain Stewart Platform Based on Offline Multibody Dynamics , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[11]  Evangelos Papadopoulos,et al.  Impedance Model-based Control for an Electrohydraulic Stewart Platform , 2009, Eur. J. Control.

[12]  Min-Jie Liu,et al.  Dynamics analysis of the Gough-Stewart platform manipulator , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[13]  Evangelos Papadopoulos,et al.  Model-based control of a 6-dof electrohydraulic Stewart–Gough platform , 2008 .

[14]  Shaowen Fu,et al.  Comments on “A Newton–Euler formulation for the inverse dynamics of the Stewart platform manipulator” by B. Dasgupta and T.S. Mruthyunjaya [Mech. Mach. Theory 33 (1998) 1135–1152] , 2007 .

[15]  Yung Ting,et al.  Modeling and control for a Gough-Stewart platform CNC machine , 2004 .

[16]  Chung-Shi Tseng,et al.  Robust PID control design for permanent magnet synchronous motor: A genetic approach , 2008 .

[17]  Oguz Ustun,et al.  A neuro-fuzzy controller for speed control of a permanent magnet synchronous motor drive , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Meng Qiang Integrated dynamics model of electrical 6-SPU parallel robot , 2010 .

[19]  Chen Rong Design of Current Control Loop for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Servo System , 2004 .

[20]  Han Ding,et al.  Dynamic analysis and model-based feedforward control of a 2-DoF translational parallel manipulator driven by linear motors , 2013, Ind. Robot.

[21]  Dong Hwan Kim,et al.  Robust tracking control design for a 6 DOF parallel manipulator , 2000 .

[22]  HongBo Guo,et al.  Cascade control of a hydraulically driven 6-DOF parallel robot manipulator based on a sliding mode , 2008 .

[23]  D. Stewart A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom , 1965 .

[24]  Carlos Canudas de Wit,et al.  A survey of models, analysis tools and compensation methods for the control of machines with friction , 1994, Autom..

[25]  B. Dasgupta,et al.  A general strategy based on the Newton-Euler approach for the dynamic formulation of parallel manipulators , 1999 .

[26]  Ayman Kassem,et al.  Mission‐based optimal control of Stewart manipulator , 2009 .

[27]  S. H. Koekebakker,et al.  Model based control of a flight simulator motion system , 2001 .

[28]  Nariman Sepehri,et al.  Cascade control of hydraulically actuated manipulators , 1990, Robotica.

[29]  Rong-Jong Wai,et al.  Total sliding-mode controller for PM synchronous servo motor drive using recurrent fuzzy neural network , 2001, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..