Solution Accelerators For Large-scale 3D Electromagnetic Inverse Problems

We provide a framework for preconditioning nonlinear 3D electromagnetic inverse scattering problems using nonlinear conjugate gradient (NLCG) and limited memory (LM) quasi-Newton methods. Key to our approach is the use of an approximate adjoint method that allows for an economical approximation of the Hessian that is updated at each inversion iteration. Using this approximate Hessian as a preconditoner, we show that the preconditioned NLCG iteration converges significantly faster than the non-preconditioned iteration, as well as converging to a data misfit level below that observed for the non-preconditioned method. Similar conclusions are also observed for the LM iteration; preconditioned with the approximate Hessian, the LM iteration converges faster than the non-preconditioned version. At this time, however, we see little difference between the convergence performance of the preconditioned LM scheme and the preconditioned NLCG scheme. A possible reason for this outcome is the behavior of the line search within the LM iteration. It was anticipated that, near convergence, a step size of one would be approached, but what was observed, instead, were step lengths that were nowhere near one. We provide some insights into the reasons for this behavior and suggest further research that may improve the performance of the LM methods.

[1]  G. Newman,et al.  Frequency‐domain modelling of airborne electromagnetic responses using staggered finite differences , 1995 .

[2]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  3D inversion of a scalar radio magnetotelluric field data set , 2003 .

[3]  M. Zhdanov Integral Transforms in Geophysics , 1988 .

[4]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations , 1983, Prentice Hall series in computational mathematics.

[5]  W. Chew Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media , 1990 .

[6]  William Rodi,et al.  Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion , 2001 .

[7]  J. Nocedal Updating Quasi-Newton Matrices With Limited Storage , 1980 .

[8]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Image appraisal for 2-D and 3-D electromagnetic inversion , 2000 .

[9]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Solution strategies for two- and three-dimensional electromagnetic inverse problems , 2000 .

[10]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[11]  J. Shadid,et al.  Three‐dimensional wideband electromagnetic modeling on massively parallel computers , 1996 .

[12]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Three‐dimensional massively parallel electromagnetic inversion—I. Theory , 1997 .

[13]  R. Schnabel,et al.  A NEW DERIVATION OF SYMMETRIC POSITIVE DEFINITE SECANT UPDATES , 1980 .

[14]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Crosswell electromagnetic inversion using integral and differential equations , 1995 .

[15]  A. Perry A Class of Conjugate Gradient Algorithms with a Two-Step Variable Metric Memory , 1977 .

[16]  G. Newman,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients , 2000 .

[17]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Image appraisal for 2D and 3D electromagnetic inversion , 1998 .

[18]  Douglas R. Schmitt,et al.  Repeatability of multimode Rayleigh‐wave dispersion studies , 2003 .

[19]  R. Mackie,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using conjugate gradients , 1993 .

[20]  E. Haber,et al.  Joint inversion: a structural approach , 1997 .

[21]  E. Haber,et al.  Inversion of 3D electromagnetic data in frequency and time domain using an inexact all-at-once approach , 2004 .

[22]  G. Newman,et al.  Three-dimensional massively parallel electromagnetic inversion—II. Analysis of a crosswell electromagnetic experiment , 1997 .

[23]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis , 1984 .

[24]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Approximate sensitivities for the electromagnetic inverse problem , 1996 .