Troubles With the Internet: The Dynamics of Help at Home

Despite advances in technology, nearly everyone experiences technical challenges using home computers and the Internet. In a field trial of household Internet usage, 89% of 93 families needed support from a computer help desk in the 1st year they used the Internet. However, usually only the most technically involved members of the family requested external technical support, and this behavior was associated with other computer-related behaviors in the household. We explore the process by which a family member with comparatively high technical skill or enthusiasm, often a teenager, becomes the family guru, makes external support requests, and becomes the person in the family to whom others turn for technical help. The family guru benefits from this role, influences the household's adoption of technology, and represents an important link between households and computer support professionals. The role also is a fascinating example of the evolution of intergeneration relationships.

[1]  J. Meyrowitz,et al.  No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. , 1987 .

[2]  S. Barley.  The Social Construction of a Machine: Ritual, Superstition, Magical Thinking and other Pragmatic Responses to Running a CT Scanner , 1988 .

[3]  Karin M. Ekström,et al.  Adolescents' influence in family purchase decisions: A socialization perspective , 1989 .

[4]  R. Kay.  An Analysis of Methods Used to Examine Gender Differences in Computer-Related Behavior , 1992 .

[5]  Marita Franzke,et al.  Winona gets wired: technical difficulties in the home , 1996, CACM.

[6]  A. Crouter,et al.  The family context of gender intensification in early adolescence. , 1995, Child development.

[7]  C. Zick,et al.  An Examination of Parent-Child Shared Time. , 1996 .

[8]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  The domestication of ICTs: households, families, and technical change , 1998 .

[9]  R. Wilkes,et al.  Adolescent-Parent Interaction in Family Decision Making , 1997 .

[10]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[11]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[12]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[13]  Girish N. Punj.  The formulation, empirical specification and testing of a model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles , 1983 .

[14]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services , 1996, CACM.

[15]  Rawlings Sw,et al.  Household and family characteristics , 1977 .

[16]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Information and Communication: Alternative Uses of the Internet in Households , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  L. A. Marascuilo,et al.  Statistical Methods for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. , 1989 .

[18]  M. Hoyman,et al.  Female Participation in the Informal Economy: A Neglected Issue , 1987 .

[19]  Donald J. Hempel,et al.  Family Role Structure and Housing Decisions , 1975 .

[20]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[21]  B. Whitley.  Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[22]  Robert Ferber,et al.  Husband-Wife Influence in Family Purchasing Behavior , 1974 .

[23]  L. White,et al.  The Sexual Division of Labor: Evidence from Childhood , 1981 .

[24]  Karin M. Ekström,et al.  Family Members' Perceptions of Adolescents' Influence in Family Decision Making , 1989 .

[25]  H. L. Davis,et al.  Perception of Marital Roles in Decision Processes , 1974 .

[26]  David Lowery,et al.  Citizen Responses to Dissatisfaction in Urban Communities: A Partial Test of a General Model , 1989, The Journal of Politics.

[27]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Encountering an Alien Culture , 1984 .

[28]  W. Qualls.  Household Decision Behavior: The Impact of Husbands' and Wives' Sex Role Orientation , 1987 .

[29]  H. L. Davis,et al.  Decision Making within the Household , 1976 .

[30]  G. E. Lang,et al.  The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate , 1987 .

[31]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[32]  M. Withey,et al.  Predicting Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect. , 1989 .

[33]  Owen Adams.  Falling through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide: A Report on the Telecommunications and Information Technology Gap in America , 2000 .

[34]  S. Beatty,et al.  Adolescent Influence in Family Decision Making: A Replication with Extension , 1994 .

[35]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Leonard A. Marascuilo,et al.  Statistical methods for the social and behavioral sciences , 1990 .

[37]  R. Mansell,et al.  Communication by design: the politics of information and communication technologies , 1996 .

[38]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[39]  A. Hirschman,et al.  Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States , 1971 .