In Part I of this series [5], we introduced a class of notions of forcing which we call [Formula: see text]-Prikry, and showed that many of the known Prikry-type notions of forcing that centers around singular cardinals of countable cofinality are [Formula: see text]-Prikry. We proved that given a [Formula: see text]-Prikry poset [Formula: see text] and a [Formula: see text]-name for a nonreflecting stationary set [Formula: see text], there exists a corresponding [Formula: see text]-Prikry poset that projects to [Formula: see text] and kills the stationarity of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we develop a general scheme for iterating [Formula: see text]-Prikry posets, as well as verify that the Extender-based Prikry forcing is [Formula: see text]-Prikry. As an application, we blow-up the power of a countable limit of Laver-indestructible supercompact cardinals, and then iteratively kill all nonreflecting stationary subsets of its successor. This yields a model in which the singular cardinal hypothesis fails and simultaneous reflection of finite families of stationary sets holds.
[1]
R. Engelking,et al.
Some theorems of set theory and their topological consequences
,
1965
.
[3]
Alejandro Poveda.
Contributions to the Theory of Large Cardinals through the Method of Forcing
,
2021,
The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic.
[4]
Stevo Todorcevic,et al.
Introduction to Ramsey Spaces
,
2010
.
[5]
A. Roslanowski.
Explicit example of collapsing kappa^+ in iteration of kappa-proper forcings.
,
2018,
1808.01636.
[6]
Moti Gitik,et al.
Prikry-Type Forcings
,
2010
.
[7]
Moti Gitik.
Blowing Up the Power of a Singular Cardinal
,
1996,
Ann. Pure Appl. Log..
[8]
Moti Gitik,et al.
Extender Based Forcings
,
1994,
J. Symb. Log..