Interplay of static and dynamic features in biomimetic smart ears.

Horseshoe bats (family Rhinolophidae) have sophisticated biosonar systems with outer ears (pinnae) that are characterized by static local shape features as well as dynamic non-rigid changes to their overall shapes. Here, biomimetic prototypes fabricated from elastic rubber sheets have been used to study the impact of these static and dynamic features on the acoustic device characteristics. The basic shape of the prototypes was an obliquely truncated horn augmented with three static local shape features: vertical ridge, pinna-rim incision and frontal flap (antitragus). The prototype shape was deformed dynamically using a one-point actuation mechanism to produce a biomimetic bending of the prototype's tip. In isolation, the local shape features had little impact on the device beampattern. However, strong interactions were observed between these features and the overall deformation. The further the prototype tip was bent down, the stronger the beampatterns associated with combinations of multiple features differed from the upright configuration in the prominence of sidelobes. This behavior was qualitatively similar to numerical predictions for horseshoe bats. Hence, the interplay between static and dynamic features could be a bioinspired principle for affecting large changes through the dynamic manipulations of interactions that are sensitive to small geometrical changes.

[1]  J A Simmons,et al.  Echolocation in bats: the external ear and perception of the vertical positions of targets. , 1982, Science.

[2]  Rolf Müller,et al.  A digital model for the deformation of bat ears. , 2010 .

[3]  J. Hill,et al.  Bats: A Natural History , 1984 .

[4]  Jeremy M. V. Rayner,et al.  Foraging behavior and echolocation of wild horseshoe bats Rhinolophus ferrumequinum and R. hipposideros (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  J. Simmons,et al.  Spatially dependent acoustic cues generated by the external ear of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Rolf Müller,et al.  Ear deformations in the biosonar system of horseshoe bats. , 2010 .

[7]  Rolf Müller,et al.  Noseleaf Dynamics during Pulse Emission in Horseshoe Bats , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  H. Schneider,et al.  Die Ohrbewegungen der Hufeisenfledermäuse (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) und der Mechanismus des Bildhörens , 2004, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[9]  Rolf Müller,et al.  Ear deformations give bats a physical mechanism for fast adaptation of ultrasonic beam patterns. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[10]  Rolf Müller,et al.  A numerical study of the role of the tragus in the big brown bat. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. Simmons,et al.  Sound source elevation and external ear cues influence the discrimination of spectral notches by the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Rolf Müller,et al.  A method for characterizing the biodiversity in bat pinnae as a basis for engineering analysis , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[13]  Rolf Müller,et al.  Characterization of the time-variant behavior of a biomimetic beamforming baffle. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Rolf Müller,et al.  Sound-diffracting flap in the ear of a bat generates spatial information. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[15]  Stephen J. Rossiter,et al.  PHYLOGENETICS OF SMALL HORSESHOE BATS FROM EAST ASIA BASED ON MITOCHONDRIAL DNA SEQUENCE VARIATION , 2006 .

[16]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  The role of pinna movement for the localization of vertical and horizontal wire obstacles in the greater horseshoe bat, Rhinolopus ferrumequinum , 1988 .