First observation of the ground-state electron-capture of $^{40}$K

Potassium-40 is a widespread, naturally-occurring isotope whose radioactivity impacts estimated geological ages spanning billions of years, nuclear structure theory, and subatomic rare-event searches – including those for dark matter and neutrinoless double-beta decay. The decays of this long-lived isotope must be precisely known for its use as a geochronometer, and to account for its presence in low-background experiments. There are several known decay modes for potassium-40, but a predicted electron-capture decay directly to the ground state of argon-40 has never been observed. The existence of this decay mode impacts several fields, while theoretical predictions span an order of magnitude. Here we report on the first, successful observation of this rare decay mode, obtained by the KDK (potassium decay) collaboration using a novel combination of a low-threshold X-ray detector surrounded by a tonne-scale, high-efficiency γ -ray tagger at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. A blinded analysis reveals a distinctly non-zero ratio of intensities of ground-state electron-captures ( I EC 0 ) over excited-state ones ( I EC* ) of I EC 0 /I EC* = 0 . 0095 stat ± 0 . 0022 sys ± 0 . 0010 (68%CL), with the null hypothesis rejected at 4 σ [Stukel et al ., arXiv:2022]. In terms of branching ratio, this unambiguous signal yields I EC 0 = 0 . 098% stat ± 0 . 023% sys ± 0 . 010%, roughly half of the commonly used prediction. This first observation of a third-forbidden unique electron capture im-proves our understanding of low-energy backgrounds in dark-matter searches and has implications for nuclear-structure calculations. For example, a shell-model based theoretical estimate for the neutrinoless double-beta decay half-life of calcium-48 is increased by a factor of 7 +3 − 2 . Our non-zero measurement shifts geochronological ages by up to a percent; implications are illustrated for Earth and solar system chronologies.

[1]  Y. Liu,et al.  Rare $^{40}$K decay with implications for fundamental physics and geochronology , 2022, 2211.10319.

[2]  Y. Amelin,et al.  Activity standardization of two enriched 40K solutions for the determination of decay scheme parameters and the half-life. , 2022, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[3]  M. Friedl,et al.  Simulation-based design study for the passive shielding of the COSINUS dark matter experiment , 2021, The European Physical Journal C.

[4]  S. Cebrián,et al.  Annual modulation results from three-year exposure of ANAIS-112 , 2021, Physical Review D.

[5]  Y. Liu,et al.  A novel experimental system for the KDK measurement of the $^{40}$K decay scheme relevant for rare event searches , 2020, 2012.15232.

[6]  D. Mark,et al.  Production of 40Ar by an overlooked mode of 40K decay with implications for K-Ar geochronology , 2020 .

[7]  X. Mougeot Towards high-precision calculation of electron capture decays. , 2019, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[8]  K. Zuber,et al.  Neutrino–nuclear responses for astro-neutrinos, single beta decays and double beta decays , 2019, Physics Reports.

[9]  M. Schumann Direct detection of WIMP dark matter: concepts and status , 2019, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics.

[10]  The University of Adelaide,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of the SABRE PoP background , 2018, Astroparticle Physics.

[11]  A. Mattei,et al.  First model independent results from DAMA/LIBRA-phase2 , 2018, Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy.

[12]  A. Mattei,et al.  First Model Independent Results from DAMA/LIBRA–Phase2 , 2018, Universe.

[13]  H. J. Kim,et al.  Background model for the NaI(Tl) crystals in COSINE-100 , 2018, The European Physical Journal C.

[14]  J. Suhonen Value of the Axial-Vector Coupling Strength in β and ββ Decays: A Review , 2017, Front. Phys..

[15]  Y. Liu,et al.  The KDK (potassium decay) experiment , 2017, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[16]  X. Mougeot Improved calculations of electron capture transitions for decay data and radionuclide metrology. , 2017, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[17]  P. Renne,et al.  Intercalibration and age of the Alder Creek sanidine 40Ar/39Ar standard , 2017 .

[18]  J. Suhonen,et al.  Spectrum-shape method and the next-to-leading-order terms of the β-decay shape factor , 2017 .

[19]  B. A. Brown,et al.  The Shell-Model Code NuShellX@MSU , 2014 .

[20]  J. Suhonen,et al.  Spin-dipole nuclear matrix elements for double beta decays and astro-neutrinos , 2014 .

[21]  J. Pradler,et al.  On an unverified nuclear decay and its role in the DAMA experiment , 2012, 1210.5501.

[22]  I. Mcdougall,et al.  Calibration of GA1550 biotite standard for K/Ar and 40Ar/39Ar dating , 2011 .

[23]  P. Renne,et al.  Joint determination of 40K decay constants and 40Ar∗/40K for the Fish Canyon sanidine standard, and improved accuracy for 40Ar/39Ar geochronology , 2010 .

[24]  P. Renne,et al.  Synchronizing Rock Clocks of Earth History , 2008, Science.

[25]  P. Renne,et al.  Age calibration of the Fish Canyon sanidine 40Ar/39Ar dating standard using primary K–Ar standards , 2006 .

[26]  M. Kortelainen,et al.  Nuclear muon capture as a powerful probe of double-beta decays in light nuclei , 2004 .

[27]  Balraj Singh,et al.  Nuclear Data Sheets for A=40☆ , 2004 .

[28]  A. H. Wapstra,et al.  The AME2003 atomic mass evaluation . (II). Tables, graphs and references , 2003 .

[29]  P. Renne 40Ar/39Ar age of plagioclase from Acapulco meteorite and the problem of systematic errors in cosmochronology , 2000 .

[30]  H. Janssen,et al.  Evaluation of atomic shell data , 1996 .

[31]  G. Wasserburg,et al.  Samarium-neodymium evolution of meteorites , 1992 .

[32]  Robert Cousins,et al.  Clarification of the use of CHI-square and likelihood functions in fits to histograms , 1984 .

[33]  R. Steiger,et al.  Subcommission on geochronology: Convention on the use of decay constants in geo- and cosmochronology , 1977 .

[34]  K. West,et al.  Determination of the Gaussian and Lorentzian content of experimental line shapes , 1974 .

[35]  N. B. Gove,et al.  Log-f tables for beta decay , 1971 .

[36]  F. Kondev,et al.  The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references , 2021, Chinese Physics C.

[37]  X. Mougeot BetaShape: A new code for improved analytical calculations of beta spectra , 2017 .

[38]  M. Wadhwa,et al.  The uranium isotopic composition of the Earth and the Solar System , 2015 .

[39]  P. Bogdanovich,et al.  Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables , 2013 .

[40]  G. Manhès,et al.  The thermal history of the Acapulco meteorite and its parent body deduced from U/Pb systematics in mineral separates and bulk rock fragments , 2010 .

[41]  P. Renne,et al.  for the Fish Canyon sanidine standard, and improved accuracy for 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology , 2010 .

[42]  A. Dell'Acqua,et al.  Geant4 - A simulation toolkit , 2003 .

[43]  P. Renne,et al.  Call for an improved set of decay constants for geochronological use , 2001 .

[44]  P. Renne,et al.  A test for systematic errors in 40Ar/39Ar geochronology through comparison with U/Pb analysis of a 1.1-Ga rhyolite , 2000 .