Body-Guided Galvanic Coupling Communication for Secure Biometric Data

In a world dominated by the wearable IoT devices, malicious security threats have become a common concern in system design. Guided by this notion, we propose a secure transmission system through body-guided channels using Galvanic Coupling (GC). The GC-method injects weak electrical current into human tissue, primarily propagating through the skin. The proposed design provides impermeability to malicious attacks, (e.g. side-channel sniffing) when sending biometric data, as the body behaves as a natural waveguide. The following contributions are: 1) the analytical formulation and empirical verification of a 3D tissue equivalent circuit model for GC-signal propagation of the human arm-wrist-palm channel; 2) the simulation study of numerous modulation schemes, drawn from the validated results of the GC-channel model; 3) the design and implementation of a transceiver prototype using optimal communication parameters (modulation, frequency, power) for transmission on a dielectrically equivalent tissue phantom; and 4) through the experimental trials, we demonstrate the eavesdropping susceptibility of the GC-signals, and similar body communication techniques, over-the-air and while in direct contact with the medium. The performance results of the GC-transceiver prototype yield a bit error rate of 10−6 with a transmit power of −2 dBm, in addition to over 7 $\times$ reduction of signal radiation outside the body compared to capacitive coupling.

[1]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  Individual identification via electrocardiogram analysis , 2015, Biomedical engineering online.

[2]  Anita Pal,et al.  Evaluation of Bioelectric Signals for Human Recognition , 2015 .

[3]  Tao Wang,et al.  A 0.45-V Low-Power OOK/FSK RF Receiver in 0.18 $\mu\text{m}$ CMOS Technology for Implantable Medical Applications , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[4]  Christian Holz,et al.  Biometric Touch Sensing: Seamlessly Augmenting Each Touch with Continuous Authentication , 2015, UIST.

[5]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[6]  John H Challis,et al.  Architectural properties of the first dorsal interosseous muscle , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[7]  Alanson P. Sample,et al.  EM-Comm , 2017, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[8]  Jonathan Rose,et al.  Measuring the Gap Between FPGAs and ASICs , 2007, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[9]  Daniel T. H. Lai,et al.  An energy-efficient pulse position modulation transmitter for galvanic intrabody communications , 2014 .

[10]  Gunar Schirner,et al.  Multi-Path Model and Sensitivity Analysis for Galvanic Coupled Intra-Body Communication Through Layered Tissue , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[11]  H. Yoo,et al.  The Effects of Electrode Configuration on Body Channel Communication Based on Analysis of Vertical and Horizontal Electric Dipoles , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[12]  Dimitrios Hatzinakos,et al.  On Evaluating ECG Biometric Systems: Session-Dependence and Body Posture , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[13]  Mir Hojjat Seyedi A Novel Intrabody CommunicationTransceiver for BiomedicalApplications , 2014 .

[14]  Chaitali Chakrabarti,et al.  A System Level Energy Model and Energy-Quality Evaluation for Integrated Transceiver Front-Ends , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems.

[15]  Alberto Fazzi,et al.  Human-centric connectivity enabled by body-coupled communications , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Abbes Amira,et al.  ECG Security Identification System on the Zynq SoC Platform , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing.

[17]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  Wearable key: device for personalizing nearby environment , 2000, Digest of Papers. Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[18]  K. Fox,et al.  Radial and ulnar cortical thickness of the second metacarpal , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  Sung-Weon Kang,et al.  Review of capacitive coupling human body communications based on digital transmission , 2016, ICT Express.

[20]  Daniel T. H. Lai,et al.  Characterization of Impulse Radio Intrabody Communication System for Wireless Body Area Networks , 2017, Journal of medical and biological engineering.

[21]  Wolfgang Fichtner,et al.  Signal Transmission by Galvanic Coupling Through the Human Body , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[22]  Michele Nogueira Lima,et al.  Secure On-skin Biometric Signal Transmission using Galvanic Coupling , 2019, IEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[23]  Kenichi Ito,et al.  Signal Path Loss Simulation of Human Arm for Galvanic Coupling Intra-Body Communication Using Circuit and Finite Element Method Models , 2015, 2015 IEEE Twelfth International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems.

[24]  Shyamnath Gollakota,et al.  Enabling on-body transmissions with commodity devices , 2016, UbiComp.

[25]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Experimental assessment of human-body-like tissue as a communication channel for galvanic coupling , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN).