Internationalization and varieties of capitalism: the limited effects of cross-national coordination of economic activities on the nature of business systems

The increasing internationalization of economic activities in the late twentieth century has encouraged the belief that a new form of cross-national economic organization is becoming established and replacing existing forms of capitalism. Both the intensification of international competition and growth of managerial coordination across borders are seen as generating the convergence of currently separate business systems. However, the extent of such internationalization is less than often claimed, especially when compared to the late nineteenth century, and the processes by which it will lead to such convergence remain obscure. Since the different varieties of capitalist economic organization in Europe, Asia and the Americas developed over some time interdependently with dominant societal institutions, the ways in which they change as a result of internationalization are path dependent and reflect their historical legacies as well as current institutional linkages. Qualitative changes in central business system characteristics, such as ownership relations, non-ownership coordination and employment policies, are therefore unlikely to be rapid or to result solely from internationalization. Furthermore, the ways in which firms from different business systems internationalize reflect their varied natures and strategies which are unlikely to alter greatly unless key institutions alter. If multinational firms do develop different characteristics from national competitors, their impact on their domestic and host business systems will likewise depend on a number of strong conditions. Similarly, the establishment of a distinctive and dominant 'global' business system is only likely in very restrictive circumstances.

[1]  Wolfgang Streeck,et al.  Governing Capitalist Economies , 1996 .

[2]  M. Bauer,et al.  Qui gouverne les groupes industriels? : essai sur l'exercice du pouvoir du et dans le groupe industriel , 1983 .

[3]  Tatjana Globokar,et al.  Eastern Europe Meets West - an Empirical Study on French Management in a Slovenian Plant , 1997 .

[4]  C. Mako,et al.  Employment Relations in Multinational Companies: the Hungarian Case , 1995 .

[5]  James W. Brock,et al.  Bigger Isn't Always Better: Challenging Corporate Giantism@@@The Bigness Complex: Industry, Labor, and Government in the American Economy.@@@Monopoly Mail: Privatizing the United States Postal Service.@@@Creating Capitalism: The State and Small Business Since 1945. , 1989 .

[6]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Jacques Delors and European Integration. , 1994 .

[7]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  British factory, Japanese factory , 1973 .

[8]  Stacia E. Zabusky,et al.  Making Capitalism: The Social and Cultural Construction of a South Korean Conglomerate. , 1994 .

[9]  Ichiro Numazaki Networks and partnerships : the social organization of the Chinese business elite in Taiwan , 1992 .

[10]  M. Enright,et al.  The Hong Kong Advantage , 1997 .

[11]  Alice H. Amsden,et al.  Asia's next giant , 1989 .

[12]  R. Whitley,et al.  Institutional Transformation and Enterprise Change in an Emergent Capitalist Economy: The Case of Hungary , 1998 .

[13]  Business Systems : Industrial Wisdom and Corporate Strategies – The Case of the Pulp-and-Paper Industry , 1991 .

[14]  L. Kenworthy Globalization and Economic Convergence , 1997 .

[15]  The determinants of the hierarchical organization of industry , 1980 .

[16]  R. Whitley,et al.  The Transformation of Work Processes in Emergent Capitalism: The Case of Hungary' , 1998 .

[17]  R. Whitley,et al.  Ownership, Control and the Management of Labour in an Emergent Capitalist Economy: The Case of Hungary , 1997 .

[18]  Karl P. Sauvant UNCTAD, World Investment Report 1996: Investment, Trade and International Policy Arrangements (Geneva and New York: United Nations, 1996) , 1996 .

[19]  R. Ricupero,et al.  World Investment Report 1997 , 1997 .

[20]  Karl Fields,et al.  Enterprise and the State in Korea and Taiwan , 1995 .

[21]  K. Lilja,et al.  The Nature of the Typical Finnish Firm , 1996 .

[22]  G. Ingham,et al.  Capitalism divided?: The City and industry in British social development , 1984 .

[23]  L. Taylor The Revival of the Liberal Creed: The IMF and the World Bank in a Globalized Economy , 1997 .

[24]  H. Botti Misunderstandings: A Japanese Transplant in Italy Strives for Lean Production , 1995 .

[25]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Governance of the American Economy , 1991 .

[26]  J. Horovitz Top management control in Europe , 1980 .

[27]  J. Hollingsworth,et al.  Contemporary Capitalism: From National Embeddedness to Spatial and Institutional Nestedness , 1997 .

[28]  김인영 일본, 한국, 대만의 기업조직 : 제도의 관점에서, The Economic Organization of East Asian Capitalism Marco Orrù, by Nicole Woolsey Biggart and Gary G. Hamilton (Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997) , 1998 .

[29]  Roger L. Janelli,et al.  Making Capitalism: The Social and Cultural Construction of a South Korean Conglomerate , 1995 .

[30]  Tim Koechlin THE GLOBALIZATION OF INVESTMENT , 1995 .

[31]  Charles Baden-Fuller,et al.  Globalization frustrated: The case of white goods , 1991 .

[32]  D. Westney The Japanese Business System: Key Features and Prospects for Change , 1996 .

[33]  G. Redding The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism , 1995 .

[34]  Grahame F. Thompson,et al.  Globalization in Question , 1996 .