Comparing driver reaction and mental workload of visual and auditory take-over request from perspective of driver characteristics and eye-tracking metrics
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T. Sawaragi,et al. Comparing eye-tracking metrics of mental workload caused by NDRTs in semi-autonomous driving , 2022, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[2] Tetsuo Sawaragi,et al. Adaptive multi-modal interface model concerning mental workload in take-over request during semi-autonomous driving , 2021 .
[3] Tatsuya Suzuki,et al. Drivers’ driving style and their take-over-control judgment , 2020 .
[4] P. Paubel,et al. Toward the Use of Pupillary Responses for Pilot Selection , 2020, Hum. Factors.
[5] S. Brandenburg,et al. Behavioral changes to repeated takeovers in automated driving: The drivers’ ability to transfer knowledge and the effects of takeover request process , 2020 .
[6] Michael G. Lenné,et al. Effects of Distraction in On-Road Level 2 Automated Driving: Impacts on Glance Behavior and Takeover Performance , 2020, Hum. Factors.
[7] Hanna Yun,et al. Multimodal warning design for take-over request in conditionally automated driving , 2020, European Transport Research Review.
[8] Motoyuki Akamatsu,et al. Effects of cognitive and visual loads on driving performance after take-over request (TOR) in automated driving. , 2020, Applied ergonomics.
[9] Michael G. Lenné,et al. Effects of different non-driving-related-task display modes on drivers’ eye-movement patterns during take-over in an automated vehicle , 2020 .
[10] Qiuyang Tang,et al. Olfactory Facilitation of Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving , 2020, Hum. Factors.
[11] Gaojian Huang,et al. Multimodal Cue Combinations: A Possible Approach to Designing In-Vehicle Takeover Requests for Semi-autonomous Driving , 2019, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
[12] Lee Skrypchuk,et al. The comparison of auditory, tactile, and multimodal warnings for the effective communication of unexpected events during an automated driving scenario , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[13] Sky Eurich,et al. Quality of control takeover following disengagements in semi-automated vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[14] Lihua Huang,et al. Quantitatively exploring the relationship between eye movement and driving behavior under the effect of different complex diagrammatic guide signs , 2019, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[15] Jacob Haspiel,et al. Look Who's Talking Now: Implications of AV's Explanations on Driver's Trust, AV Preference, Anxiety and Mental Workload , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.
[16] So Young Kim,et al. Effects of Touch, Voice, and Multimodal Input, and Task Load on Multiple-UAV Monitoring Performance During Simulated Manned-Unmanned Teaming in a Military Helicopter , 2018, Hum. Factors.
[17] Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer,et al. Take-over requests in highly automated driving: A crowdsourcing survey on auditory, vibrotactile, and visual displays , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[18] Florian Alt,et al. Your Eyes Tell: Leveraging Smooth Pursuit for Assessing Cognitive Workload , 2018, CHI.
[19] Natasha Merat,et al. Coming back into the loop: Drivers' perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[20] Natasha Merat,et al. What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems , 2017 .
[21] Marco Dozza,et al. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[22] Régis Lobjois,et al. The effects of driving environment complexity and dual tasking on drivers’ mental workload and eye blink behavior , 2016 .
[23] Linda Ng Boyle,et al. Drivers’ Engagement Level in Adaptive Cruise Control while Distracted or Impaired , 2015 .
[24] M. Niezgoda,et al. Towards testing auditory–vocal interfaces and detecting distraction while driving: A comparison of eye-movement measures in the assessment of cognitive workload , 2015 .
[25] William Payre,et al. Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability , 2014 .
[26] Ying Wang,et al. The sensitivity of different methodologies for characterizing drivers’ gaze concentration under increased cognitive demand , 2014, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[27] Simone Benedetto,et al. Driver workload and eye blink duration , 2011 .
[28] Torbjørn Rundmo,et al. An investigation of driver attitudes and behaviour in rural and urban areas in Norway. , 2010 .
[29] P. Ulleberg,et al. Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers , 2003 .
[30] C. E. SHANNON,et al. A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.
[31] Jiro Sakamoto,et al. Estimation of mental workload during automobile driving based on eye-movement measurement with a visible light camera , 2020, Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese).
[32] P. Bentler,et al. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .