Evaluation of Linear Kernel-Driven BRDF Models over Snow-Free Rugged Terrain

Semi-empirical kernel-driven models have been widely used to characterize anisotropic reflectance due to their simple form and physically meaningful approximation. Recently, several kernel-driven models have been coupled with topographic effects to improve the fitting of bidirectional reflectance over rugged terrains. However, extensive evaluations of the various models’ performances are required before their subsequent application in remote sensing. Three typical kernel-driven BRDF models over snow-free rugged terrains such as the RTLSR, TCKD, and the KDST-adjusted TCKD (KDST-TCKD) were investigated in this paper using simulated and observed BRFs. Against simulated data, the fitting error (NIR/Red RMSE) of the RTLSR gradually increases from 0.0358/0.0342 to 0.0471/0.0516 with mean slopes (α) increases from 9.13° to 33.40°. However, the TCKD and KDST-TCKD models perform an overall better fitting accuracy: the fitting errors of TCKD gradually decreased from 0.0366/0.0337 to 0.0252/0.0292, and the best fit from the KDST-TCDK model with NIR/Red RMSE decreased from 0.0192/0.0269 to 0.0169/0.0180. When compared to the sandbox data (α from 8.4° to 30.36°), the NIR/Red RMSE of the RTLSR model ranges from 0.0147/0.0085 to 0.0346/0.0165, for the TCKD model from 0.0144/0.0086 to 0.0298/0.0154, and for the KDST-TCKD model from 0.0137/0.0082 to 0.0234/0.0149. Using MODIS data, the TCKD and KDST-TCKD models show more significant improvements compared to the RTLSR model in rugged terrains. Their RMSE differences are within 0.003 over a relatively flat terrain (α < 10°). When α is large (20°–30° and >30°), the RMSE of the TCKD model has a decrease of around 0.01 compared to that of the RTLSR; for KDST-TCKD, it is approximately 0.02, and can even reach 0.0334 in the savannas. Therefore, the TCKD and KDST-TCKD models have an overall better performance than the RTLSR model in rugged terrains, especially in the case of large mean slopes. Among them, the KDST-TCKD model performs the best due to its consideration of topographic effects, geotropic growth, and component spectra.

[1]  Xiaodan Wu,et al.  Characterizing the Effect of Spatial Heterogeneity and the Deployment of Sampled Plots on the Uncertainty of Ground “Truth” on a Coarse Grid Scale: Case Study for Near‐Infrared (NIR) Surface Reflectance , 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[2]  Ainong Li,et al.  SGOT: A Simplified Geometric-Optical Model for Crown Scene Components Modeling over Rugged Terrain , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[3]  X. Mu,et al.  Revisiting the Performance of the Kernel-Driven BRDF Model Using Filtered High-Quality POLDER Observations , 2022, Forests.

[4]  Zhiqiang Xiao,et al.  The 4SAILT Model: An Improved 4SAIL Canopy Radiative Transfer Model for Sloping Terrain , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Dongqin You,et al.  An Improved Topography-Coupled Kernel-Driven Model for Land Surface Anisotropic Reflectance , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  X. Mu,et al.  Modeling surface longwave radiation over high-relief terrain , 2020 .

[7]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Sensitivity of Coarse‐Scale Snow‐Free Land Surface Shortwave Albedo to Topography , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[8]  Donghui Xie,et al.  LESS: LargE-Scale remote sensing data and image simulation framework over heterogeneous 3D scenes , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[9]  Qing Xiao,et al.  Modeling Discrete Forest Anisotropic Reflectance Over a Sloped Surface With an Extended GOMS and SAIL Model , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Qing Xiao,et al.  Derivation of Kernel Functions for Kernel-Driven Reflectance Model Over Sloping Terrain , 2019, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Yong Tang,et al.  Modeling Anisotropic Reflectance Over Composite Sloping Terrain , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  C. Schaaf,et al.  Capturing rapid land surface dynamics with Collection V006 MODIS BRDF/NBAR/Albedo (MCD43) products , 2018 .

[13]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Characterizing Land Surface Anisotropic Reflectance over Rugged Terrain: A Review of Concepts and Recent Developments , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[14]  Crystal B. Schaaf,et al.  Evaluation of the VIIRS BRDF, Albedo and NBAR products suite and an assessment of continuity with the long term MODIS record , 2017 .

[15]  Ainong Li,et al.  Modeling Canopy Reflectance Over Sloping Terrain Based on Path Length Correction , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Yong Tang,et al.  Forward a Small-Timescale BRDF/Albedo by Multisensor Combined BRDF Inversion Model , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Shunlin Liang,et al.  Direct Estimation of Land Surface Albedo From Simultaneous MISR Data , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  A Method for Improving Hotspot Directional Signatures in BRDF Models Used for MODIS , 2016 .

[19]  Peng Zhao,et al.  Study of the Remote Sensing Model of FAPAR over Rugged Terrains , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[20]  L. Bruzzone,et al.  Retrieval of Leaf Area Index in mountain grasslands in the Alps from MODIS satellite imagery , 2015 .

[21]  Wout Verhoef,et al.  Modeling Top of Atmosphere Radiance over Heterogeneous Non-Lambertian Rugged Terrain , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[22]  S. Liang,et al.  Assessment of five global satellite products of fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation: Intercomparison and direct validation against ground-based data , 2015 .

[23]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Modeling Land Surface Reflectance Coupled BRDF for HJ-1/CCD Data of Rugged Terrain in Heihe River Basin, China , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Weimin Ju,et al.  GOST: A Geometric-Optical Model for Sloping Terrains , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Suhong Liu,et al.  Direct-Estimation Algorithm for Mapping Daily Land-Surface Broadband Albedo From MODIS Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  D. Jupp,et al.  A physics-based atmospheric and BRDF correction for Landsat data over mountainous terrain , 2012 .

[27]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Scale effect and scale correction of land-surface albedo in rugged terrain , 2009 .

[28]  F. Baret,et al.  Influence of landscape spatial heterogeneity on the non-linear estimation of leaf area index from moderate spatial resolution remote sensing data , 2006 .

[29]  N. C. Strugnell,et al.  First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS , 2002 .

[30]  Craig Trotter,et al.  Extending a turbid medium BRDF model to allow sloping terrain with a vertical plant stand , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[31]  A. Strahler,et al.  On the derivation of kernels for kernel‐driven models of bidirectional reflectance , 1995 .

[32]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Topographic effects on bidirectional and hemispherical reflectances calculated with a geometric-optical canopy model , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[33]  J. Roujean,et al.  A bidirectional reflectance model of the Earth's surface for the correction of remote sensing data , 1992 .

[34]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Geometric-optical bidirectional reflectance modeling of the discrete crown vegetation canopy: effect of crown shape and mutual shadowing , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[35]  Guangjian Yan,et al.  Topographic radiation modeling and spatial scaling of clear-sky land surface longwave radiation over rugged terrain , 2016 .

[36]  Anton J. J. van Rompaey,et al.  he effect of atmospheric and topographic correction methods on land cover lassification accuracy , 2013 .

[37]  J. Ross.  The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands , 1981, Tasks for vegetation sciences 3.