Benchmarking habitat quality: observations using River Habitat Survey on near‐natural streams and rivers in northern and western Europe

Abstract 1.Some ecological effects of physically modifying rivers are still unclear, partly due to scale factors, but also because the character of high quality habitat is poorly understood.2.Surveys at 278 sites on 141 near-natural streams and rivers in northern and western Europe were carried out between 1994 and 2009 to benchmark the habitat quality assessment system used for River Habitat Survey (RHS).3.The objectives were to establish if RHS was suitable outside the UK, investigate if 500 m was still valid as the survey length, suggest a benchmarking strategy and recommend improvements to habitat quality assessment protocols.4.Some modifications to RHS are needed to take account of differences in hydrological conditions, land-use and, most importantly, riparian habitat structure found in mainland Europe.5.On average, 82–87% of channel attributes and 87–98% of channel and bank features were recorded within the first of consecutive RHS sites, confirming that 500 m is an effective sample length for characterizing small rivers.6.Stream-flow character appeared to influence the distribution of several in-channel features, with greater diversity and between-site variation associated with rivers of mixed flow-types. To account for local variation and for effective use of survey time, it is recommended that two or more consecutive RHS sites are used for benchmarking purposes.7.A suite of assessment protocols with agreed criteria and analytical rules, linked to specific objectives (e.g. nature conservation, geomorphic condition), is needed to establish the character and habitat quality of rivers in a consistent fashion.8.A multi-discipline benchmarking programme using hydro-ecological regions in Europe would build on existing knowledge and help to improve both the inter-calibration and local application of quality assessment protocols. Data-sharing by hydrologists, river ecologists and fluvial geomorphologists would improve the basis for managing rivers in support of the European Water Framework Directive and Habitats Directive

[1]  G. Harvey,et al.  Exploring the interactions between flood defence maintenance works and river habitats: the use of River Habitat Survey data , 2009 .

[2]  Morten Lauge Pedersen,et al.  River discharge and local-scale physical habitat influence macroinvertebrate LIFE scores , 2010 .

[3]  D. Gilvear,et al.  An assessment of the use of remote sensing to map habitat features important to sustaining lamprey populations , 2008 .

[4]  Daniel R. Miller,et al.  The Network Dynamics Hypothesis: How Channel Networks Structure Riverine Habitats , 2004 .

[5]  K. Fryirs,et al.  River Styles, a Geomorphic Approach to Catchment Characterization: Implications for River Rehabilitation in Bega Catchment, New South Wales, Australia , 2000, Environmental management.

[6]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  S. Langton,et al.  Daubenton's bat distribution along rivers – developing and testing a predictive model , 2010 .

[8]  J. Sadler,et al.  Spatial dynamics of beetles living on exposed riverine sediments in the upper River Severn: method development and preliminary results , 2005 .

[9]  G. Mathias Kondolf,et al.  Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration: Uses and limitations , 1995 .

[10]  M. Naura,et al.  Principles of using River Habitat Survey to predict the distribution of aquatic species: an example applied to the native white-clawed crayfishAustropotamobius pallipes , 1998 .

[11]  Andrea Buffagni,et al.  Preliminary testing of River Habitat Survey features for the aims of the WFD hydro-morphological assessment: an overview from the STAR Project , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  F. H. Dawson,et al.  Groundwater dominated rivers , 1999 .

[13]  David M. Harper,et al.  Towards the assessment of `ecological integrity' in running waters of the United Kingdom , 2000, Hydrobiologia.

[14]  M. Dunbar,et al.  Interaction between macroinvertebrates, discharge and physical habitat in upland rivers , 2010 .

[15]  W. Cleveland.  Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[16]  P. Armitage,et al.  Assessing stream quality using information on mesohabitat distribution and character , 2000 .

[17]  J. Matschullat,et al.  Hydromorphological assessment within the EU-Water Framework Directive—trans-boundary cooperation and application to different water basins , 2008, Hydrobiologia.

[18]  Mixed stream channel morphologies: implications for fish community diversity , 2009 .

[19]  HABSCORE—applications and future developments of related habitat models , 1998 .

[20]  A. Large,et al.  A predictive typology for characterising hydromorphology , 2008 .

[21]  Ian Maddock,et al.  The Importance of Physical Habitat Assessment for Evaluating River Health , 1999 .

[22]  J. Wiens.  Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[23]  Peter J.A. Fox,et al.  An account of the derivation and testing of a standard field method, River Habitat Survey , 1998 .

[24]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins , 1997 .

[25]  Barry T. Hart,et al.  Development and testing of an Index of Stream Condition for waterway management in Australia , 1999 .

[26]  P. J. Boon,et al.  Characterization of freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) riverine habitat using River Habitat Survey data , 2003 .

[27]  S. Hughes,et al.  Ecological assessment of an intermittent Mediterranean river using community structure and function: evaluating the role of different organism groups. , 2009 .

[28]  D. Sear,et al.  The geomorphological basis for classifying rivers , 1998 .

[29]  G. Blust,et al.  Towards an ecological assessment of watercourses , 1993 .

[30]  G. Harvey,et al.  Physical habitat, eco-hydraulics and river design: a review and re-evaluation of some popular concepts and methods , 2006 .

[31]  P. Schneider,et al.  Physico-chemical Assessment of the Reference Status in German Surface Waters: A Contribution to the Establishment of the EC Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EG in Germany* , 2003 .

[32]  O. Bragg,et al.  DHRAM: a method for classifying river flow regime alterations for the EC Water Framework Directive , 2005 .

[33]  Ian Phillip Vaughan,et al.  Habitat indices for rivers: derivation and applications , 2010 .

[34]  A. Solimini,et al.  Freshwater ecosystem structure–function relationships: from theory to application , 2009 .

[35]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[36]  N. Prat,et al.  A simple field method for assessing the ecological quality of riparian habitat in rivers and streams: QBR index , 2003 .

[37]  G. Petts,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTROLS OF GRAVEL‐BED RIFFLES: AN ANALYSES OF DATA FROM THE RIVER‐HABITAT SURVEY , 2004 .

[38]  A. Buffagni,et al.  The lentic–lotic character of Mediterranean rivers and its importance to aquatic invertebrate communities , 2009, Aquatic Sciences.

[39]  P. J. Boon,et al.  Towards a harmonized approach for hydromorphological assessment of rivers in Europe: a qualitative comparison of three survey methods , 2002 .

[40]  G. Harvey,et al.  Towards an ecologically meaningful classification of the flow biotope for river inventory, rehabilitation, design and appraisal purposes. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[41]  S. Ormerod,et al.  Evaluating the effects of riparian restoration on a temperate river‐system using standardized habitat survey , 2010 .

[42]  Melissa Parsons,et al.  Development of a Standardised Approach to River Habitat Assessment in Australia , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[43]  K. Fryirs,et al.  Linking geomorphic character, behaviour and condition to fluvial biodiversity: implications for river management , 2006 .

[44]  K. Irvine.  Harmonizing assessment of conservation with that of ecological quality: fitting a square peg into a round hole? , 2009 .

[45]  F. Swanson,et al.  Large wood and fluvial processes , 2002 .

[46]  J. Jeffers,et al.  Characterization of river habitats and prediction of habitat features using ordination techniques , 1998 .

[47]  Stephen James Ormerod,et al.  Climate change, river conservation and the adaptation challenge , 2009 .

[48]  M. Clark,et al.  Supporting complex decisions for sustainable river management in England and Wales , 2002 .

[49]  N. Holmes,et al.  Embedding a strategic approach to river restoration in operational management processes — experiences in England , 2010 .

[50]  Andrea Buffagni,et al.  Does the lentic-lotic character of rivers affect invertebrate metrics used in the assessment of ecological quality? , 2009 .

[51]  Convergence of field survey protocols for SERCON (System for Evaluating Rivers for Conservation) and RHS (River Habitat Survey) , 1998 .

[52]  P. J. Boon,et al.  Developing standard approaches for recording and assessing river hydromorphology: the role of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) , 2010 .

[53]  P. J. Boon,et al.  Developing a new version of SERCON (System for Evaluating Rivers for Conservation) , 2002 .

[54]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[55]  G. Woodward,et al.  Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management , 2009 .

[56]  M. Furse,et al.  The ecological status of European rivers: evaluation and intercalibration of assessment methods , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[57]  M. S. Fabre,et al.  IHG: Un índice para la valoración hidrogeomorfológica de sistemas fluviales , 2008 .

[58]  M. Newson,et al.  Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges , 2000 .

[59]  F. H. Dawson,et al.  Quality assessment using River Habitat Survey data , 1998 .

[60]  P. J. Boon,et al.  Towards an integrated approach to classifying and evaluating rivers in the UK , 1998 .

[61]  Andrea Buffagni,et al.  Looking beyond the shores of the United Kingdom: addenda for the application of River Habitat Survey in Southern European rivers , 2002 .

[62]  M. Newson.  Understanding ‘hot‐spot’ problems in catchments: the need for scale‐sensitive measures and mechanisms to secure effective solutions for river management and conservation , 2010 .

[63]  Maria Teresa Ferreira,et al.  Habitat variation at different scales and biotic linkages in lotic systems: consequences for monitorization , 2009, Aquatic Ecology.

[64]  G. McGregor,et al.  Integrating climate-hydrology-ecology for alpine river systems , 2007 .

[65]  Andrea Buffagni,et al.  Occurrence and variability of River Habitat Survey features across Europe and the consequences for data collection and evaluation , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[66]  Isabelle Durance,et al.  Climate change effects on upland stream macroinvertebrates over a 25‐year period , 2007 .

[67]  R. Kennedy,et al.  Advancing Science for Water Resources Management , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[68]  F. H. Dawson,et al.  Using river habitat survey for environmental assessment and catchment planning in the U.K. , 2000, Hydrobiologia.

[69]  Maria Teresa Ferreira,et al.  Combining habitat and biological characterization: Ecological validation of the river habitat survey , 2008, Limnetica.

[70]  Malcolm Newson,et al.  A method for applying fluvial geomorphology in support of catchment-scale river restoration planning , 2009 .

[71]  J. Jeffers,et al.  The statistical basis of sampling strategies for rivers: an example using river habitat survey , 1998 .

[72]  Samantha Jane Hughes,et al.  Hierarchical spatial patterns and drivers of change in benthic macroinvertebrate communities in an intermittent Mediterranean river , 2008 .

[73]  R. Cortes,et al.  A biologically relevant habitat condition index for streams in northern Portugal , 2005 .

[74]  A. Large,et al.  ‘Natural’ rivers, ‘hydromorphological quality’ and river restoration: a challenging new agenda for applied fluvial geomorphology , 2006 .

[75]  D. Noble,et al.  Combining surveys of river habitats and river birds to appraise riverine hydromorphology , 2007 .

[76]  Ian Phillip Vaughan,et al.  Scale-dependent effects of fine sediments on temperate headwater invertebrates , 2009 .

[77]  David M. Harper,et al.  Why should the habitat‐level approach underpin holistic river survey and management? , 1998 .