A framework for fit-for-purpose dose response assessment.

The NRC report Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment made several recommendations to improve chemical risk assessment, with a focus on in-depth chronic dose-response assessments conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The recommendations addressed two broad elements: improving technical analysis and utility for decision making. To advance the discussions in the NRC report, in three multi-stakeholder workshops organized by the Alliance for Risk Assessment, available and evolving risk assessment methodologies were considered through the development and application of case studies. A key product was a framework (http://www.allianceforrisk.org/Workshop/Framework/ProblemFormulation.html) to guide risk assessors and managers to various dose-response assessment methods relevant to a range of decision contexts ranging from priority setting to full assessment, as illustrated by case studies. It is designed to facilitate selection of appropriate methodology for a variety of problem formulations and includes a variety of methods with supporting case studies, for areas flagged specifically by the NRC committee for consideration--e.g., susceptible sub-populations, population variability and background. The framewok contributes to organization and communication about methodologies for incorporating increasingly biologically informed and chemical specific knowledge into dose-response analysis, which is considered critical in evolving fit-for-purpose assessment to address relevant problem formulations.

[1]  R. Grant,et al.  Evaluation of acute inhalation toxicity for chemicals with limited toxicity information. , 2007, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  Alan R. Boobis,et al.  Using mode of action information to improve regulatory decision-making: An ECETOC/ILSI RF/HESI workshop overview , 2011, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[3]  Fumie Yokota,et al.  Value of Information Analysis in Environmental Health Risk Management Decisions: Past, Present, and Future , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Paul S Price,et al.  Development of a source-to-outcome model for dietary exposures to insecticide residues: an example using chlorpyrifos. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[5]  C R Kirman,et al.  Quantitative human health risk assessment for 1,3-butadiene based upon ovarian effects in rodents. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[6]  Viswanath Devanarayan,et al.  Fit-for-Purpose Method Development and Validation for Successful Biomarker Measurement , 2006, Pharmaceutical Research.

[7]  Jun Nakamura,et al.  Endogenous versus exogenous DNA adducts: their role in carcinogenesis, epidemiology, and risk assessment. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[8]  D G Hoel,et al.  Fundamental carcinogenic processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment. , 1976, Cancer research.

[9]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[10]  V. Armstrong,et al.  The Assessment and Management of Industrial Chemicals in Canada , 2007 .

[11]  Robert Goble,et al.  A STRAW MAN PROPOSAL FOR A QUANTITATIVE DEFINITION OF THE RfD , 2002, Drug and chemical toxicology.

[12]  Carolyn Vickers,et al.  Risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals: A WHO/IPCS framework. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[13]  Paul S Price,et al.  Application of a source-to-outcome model for the assessment of health impacts from dietary exposures to insecticide residues. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[14]  Division on Earth Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process , 1983 .