Optimizing membrane thickness for vanadium redox flow batteries

Abstract Two important intrinsic properties of proton exchange membranes for vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) operation are proton conductivity and vanadium permeability. These characteristics are thickness-normalized quantities and depend on fundamental material parameters. However, the operational criteria of proton exchange membranes in these devices are the membrane resistance and vanadium crossover flux, both of which depend on membrane thickness. Herein, we explore the influence of the thickness of ion exchange capacity (IEC)-optimized sulfonated fluorinated poly(arylene ether) (SFPAE) membranes on their VRFB performance including charge/discharge behavior, charge depth, coulombic efficiency, voltage efficiency, energy efficiency and cell polarization. IEC-optimized SFPAE membranes with three different thicknesses (28 μm, 45 μm and 80 μm) were prepared and tested in this study. It was found that the combined effects of the ohmic loss and electrolyte crossover loss in the VRFB, which were governed by membrane thickness, resulted in an optimal membrane thickness of 45 μm for SFPAE under the conditions tested. Thicker membranes were observed to cause higher cell resistance while thinner membranes yielded larger vanadium crossover flux, both of which had negative impacts on the cell performance. The maximum power densities of the VRFBs assembled with 28 μm, 45 μm and 80 μm SFPAE membranes were 267 mW cm −2 , 311 mW cm −2 and 253 mW cm −2 respectively, much higher than that of the VRFB assembled with N212 membrane, which was 204 mW cm −2 . These results supported our previous observation that SFPAE was superior to N212 with regard to VRFB performance. The data also indicated that there is an optimum membrane thickness for a given set of properties through which the cell performance can be significantly improved while keeping the membrane material constant.

[1]  Maria Skyllas-Kazacos,et al.  Modification of membranes using polyelectrolytes to improve water transfer properties in the vanadium redox battery , 2003 .

[2]  Qinghua Liu,et al.  Dramatic performance gains in vanadium redox flow batteries through modified cell architecture , 2012 .

[3]  Maria Skyllas-Kazacos,et al.  Water transfer behaviour across cation exchange membranes in the vanadium redox battery , 2003 .

[4]  Thomas F. Fuller,et al.  Composite, Solvent-Casted Nafion Membranes for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries , 2012 .

[5]  Min Xiao,et al.  Synthesis of sulfonated poly(fluorenyl ether thioether ketone)s with bulky-block structure and its application in vanadium redox flow battery , 2011 .

[6]  Arvind R. Kalidindi,et al.  A Transient Vanadium Flow Battery Model Incorporating Vanadium Crossover and Water Transport through the Membrane , 2012 .

[7]  Huamin Zhang,et al.  Ion exchange membranes for vanadium redox flow battery (VRB) applications , 2011 .

[8]  Michael A. Hickner,et al.  Selective anion exchange membranes for high coulombic efficiency vanadium redox flow batteries , 2013 .

[9]  Emin Caglan Kumbur,et al.  Species transport mechanisms governing capacity loss in vanadium flow batteries: Comparing Nafion® and sulfonated Radel membranes , 2013 .

[10]  Shaohua Xiao,et al.  Nafion/polyvinylidene fluoride blend membranes with improved ion selectivity for vanadium redox flow , 2011 .

[11]  Michael A. Hickner,et al.  Stable fluorinated sulfonated poly(arylene ether) membranes for vanadium redox flow batteries , 2012 .

[12]  Chenxi Sun,et al.  Preparation and characterization of Nafion/SPEEK layered composite membrane and its application in vanadium redox flow battery , 2008 .

[13]  Zhenguo Yang,et al.  Membrane development for vanadium redox flow batteries. , 2011, ChemSusChem.

[14]  Emin Caglan Kumbur,et al.  Role of convection and related effects on species crossover and capacity loss in vanadium redox flow batteries , 2012 .

[15]  Xinping Qiu,et al.  Influences of permeation of vanadium ions through PVDF-g-PSSA membranes on performances of vanadium redox flow batteries. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[16]  Emin Caglan Kumbur,et al.  Open circuit voltage of vanadium redox flow batteries: Discrepancy between models and experiments , 2011 .

[17]  Qian Xu,et al.  Corrosion behavior of a positive graphite electrode in vanadium redox flow battery , 2011 .

[18]  Cy H. Fujimoto,et al.  Vanadium redox flow battery efficiency and durability studies of sulfonated Diels Alder poly(phenylene)s , 2012 .

[19]  Thomas A. Zawodzinski,et al.  Polarization curve analysis of all-vanadium redox flow batteries , 2011 .

[20]  Xinping Qiu,et al.  Nafion/SiO2 hybrid membrane for vanadium redox flow battery , 2007 .

[21]  Min Xiao,et al.  Sulfonated poly (fluorenyl ether ketone) membrane with embedded silica rich layer and enhanced proton selectivity for vanadium redox flow battery , 2010 .

[22]  Xinping Qiu,et al.  Nafion/organically modified silicate hybrids membrane for vanadium redox flow battery , 2009 .

[23]  C. Dennison,et al.  Identification of performance limiting electrode using asymmetric cell configuration in vanadium redox flow batteries , 2013 .

[24]  M. Skyllas-Kazacos,et al.  Review of material research and development for vanadium redox flow battery applications , 2013 .

[25]  Xianfeng Li,et al.  Sulfonated poly(tetramethydiphenyl ether ether ketone) membranes for vanadium redox flow battery application , 2011 .

[26]  Gareth Kear,et al.  Development of the all‐vanadium redox flow battery for energy storage: a review of technological, financial and policy aspects , 2012 .

[27]  Younian Liu,et al.  SPPEK/WO3 hybrid membrane fabricated via hydrothermal method for vanadium redox flow battery , 2012 .

[28]  Jie Bao,et al.  Dynamic modelling of the effects of ion diffusion and side reactions on the capacity loss for vanadi , 2011 .

[29]  M. Mench,et al.  Redox flow batteries: a review , 2011 .

[30]  Min Xiao,et al.  Preparation and properties of sulfonated poly(fluorenyl ether ketone) membrane for vanadium redox flow battery application , 2010 .