Rethinking Downstream Regulation: California's Opportunity to Engage Households in Reducing Greenhouse Gases

With the passage of the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32), California has begun an ambitious journey to reduce in-state GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Under the direction of executive order S-20-06, a mandated Market Advisory Committee (MAC) charged with studying market-based mechanisms to reduce GHG emissions, including cap and trade systems, has recommended taking an “upstream” approach to GHG emissions regulation, arguing that upstream regulation will reduce administrative costs because there are fewer agents. In this paper, we argue that, the total costs to society of a GHG cap and trade scheme can be minimized though downstream regulation, rather than the widely proposed upstream approach. We propose a household carbon trading system with four major components: a state allocation to households, household-to-household trading, households to utility company credit transfers, and utility companies to government credit transfers. The proposed system can also be considered more equitable than carbon taxes and upstream cap and trade systems to control GHG emissions from residential energy use and is consistent with AB32.

[1]  Todd Litman,et al.  Evaluating Transportation Equity Guidance For Incorporating Distributional Impacts in Transportation Planning , 2015 .

[2]  Ranjit Bharvirkar,et al.  The Effect on Asset Values of the Allocation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Allowances , 2002 .

[3]  Lt Lorna McCalley,et al.  Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation , 2002 .

[4]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. , 2007 .

[5]  Tina Fawcett.  Investigating carbon rationing as a policy for reducing carbon emissions from UK household energy use , 2005 .

[6]  Mark D. Levine,et al.  A Road Map for U.S. Carbon Reductions , 1998, Science.

[7]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  The safety valve and climate policy , 2004 .

[8]  T. Tietenberg.  The Tradable Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons: What Have We Learned? , 2002 .

[9]  T. Tietenberg.  Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice , 2006 .

[10]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[11]  R. Goodin.  Selling Environmental Indulgences , 1994 .

[12]  C. Marnay,et al.  Estimating carbon dioxide emission factors for the California electric power sector , 2002 .

[13]  Robert Stavins.  Chapter 9 – Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments , 2003 .

[14]  A. C. Pigou.  Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[15]  W. Montgomery,et al.  Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs" Journal of Economic Theory , 1972 .

[16]  Mithra Moezzi,et al.  Is Efficiency Enough? Towards a New Framework for Carbon Savingsin the California Residential Sector , 2005 .

[17]  A. Ellerman,et al.  Tradable permits for greenhouse gas emissions : a primer with particular reference to Europe , 2000 .

[18]  J. Dales,et al.  Pollution, Property, and Prices , 1969 .

[19]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[20]  Gonzalo Delacámara,et al.  Ethics, economics and environmental management , 2006 .

[21]  M. Fleurbaey,et al.  Implementability and Horizontal Equity Imply No-Envy , 1997 .

[22]  T. Litman.  Victoria Transport Policy Institute , 2004 .

[23]  Tina Fawcett,et al.  Carbon Rationing and Personal Energy Use , 2004 .

[24]  T. Tietenberg.  The Tradable-Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons: Lessons for Climate Change , 2003 .

[25]  David Fleming,et al.  Tradable quotas: using information technology to cap national carbon emissions , 1997 .

[26]  M. Cropper,et al.  Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade? , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  Paul Leiby,et al.  Intertemporal Permit Trading for the Control of Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2001 .

[28]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[29]  S. Roberts,et al.  A rough guide to individual carbon trading - the ideas, the issues and the next steps , 2006 .

[30]  J. Y. King,et al.  Effect of consumption choices on fluxes of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus through households , 2007, Urban Ecosystems.

[31]  E. M. Bailey,et al.  Markets for Clean Air: The U.S. Acid Rain Program , 2000 .

[32]  R. Stavins,et al.  Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments , 2002 .

[33]  M. J. Hutzler,et al.  Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States , 1995 .