Direct and indirect land‐use competition issues for energy crops and their sustainable production – an overview

Biofuel production from energy crops is land-use intensive. Land-use change (LUC) associated with bioenergy cropping impacts on the greenhouse gas (GHG) balance, both directly and indirectly. Land-use conversion can also impact on biodiversity. The current state of quantifying GHG emissions relating to direct and indirect land-use change (iLUC) from biomass produced for liquid biofuels or bioenergy is reviewed. Several options for reducing iLUC are discussed, and recommendations made for considering LUC in bioenergy and biofuel policies. Land used for energy cropping is subject to competing demands for conventional agriculture and forest production, as well as for nature protection and conservation. Biomass to be used for bioenergy and biofuels should therefore be produced primarily from excess farm and forest residues or from land not required for food and fiber production. The overall efficiency of biomass production, conversion, and use should be increased where possible in order to further reduce land competition and the related direct and iLUC risks. This review of several varying approaches to iLUC substantiates that, in principle, GHG emissions can be quantified and reductions implemented by appropriate policies. Such approaches can (and should) be refined and substantiated using better data on direct LUC trends from global monitoring, and be further improved by adding more accurate estimates of future trade patterns where appropriate. This brief discussion of current policies and options to reduce iLUC has identified a variety of approaches and options so that a quantified iLUC factor could be translated into practical regulations – both mandatory and voluntary – with few restrictions. Depending on the future development of energy cropping systems and yield improvements, sustainable bioenergy production could make a significant contribution to the future global energy demand. © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

[1]  R. Lal,et al.  Land area for establishing biofuel plantations , 2006 .

[2]  D. Scordia,et al.  Potential land availability for energy crops production in Europe , 2010 .

[3]  Dileep K. Birur,et al.  Biofuels and their By-Products: Global Economic and Environmental Implications , 2010 .

[4]  Jonas M. Joelsson,et al.  Reduction of CO2 emission and oil dependency with biomass-based polygeneration , 2010 .

[5]  W. Schlenker,et al.  Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Timothy D. Searchinger,et al.  Biofuels and the need for additional carbon , 2010 .

[7]  Betina Dimaranan,et al.  Global trade and environmental impact study of the EU biofuels mandate. , 2010 .

[8]  H. M. Londo,et al.  Assessment of global biomass potentials and their links to food, water, biodiversity, energy demand and economy : supporting document , 2008 .

[9]  U. Fritsche,et al.  The Power of Bioenergy‐Related Standards to Protect Biodiversity , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  G. Reinhardt,et al.  Life cycle assessment of selected future energy crops for Europe , 2010 .

[11]  A. Fernando,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of energy crops cultivation in Europe , 2010 .

[12]  H. M. Junginger,et al.  Production and trading of biomass for energy – an overview of the global status , 2007 .

[13]  J. Mathews.  From the petroeconomy to the bioeconomy: Integrating bioenergy production with agricultural demands , 2009 .

[14]  J. Ros,et al.  Evaluation of the indirect effects of biofuel production on biodiversity: assessment across spatial and temporal scales. , 2010 .

[15]  The contribution of by-products to the sustainability of biofuels. , 2010 .

[16]  M. Thring.  World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[17]  A. Sugrue.  Bioenergy production on marginal and degraded land: the potential social impacts , 2008 .

[18]  Tracey Holloway,et al.  Resetting global expectations from agricultural biofuels , 2009 .

[19]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[21]  Robert M'barek,et al.  Impacts of the EU biofuel target on agricultural markets and land use: a comparative modelling assessment , 2010 .

[22]  B. Dehue,et al.  Summary of approaches to accounting for indirect impacts of biofuel production. , 2009 .

[23]  R. Schaeffer,et al.  Land use competition for production of food and liquid biofuels: An analysis of the arguments in the current debate , 2010 .

[24]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Fixing a Critical Climate Accounting Error , 2009, Science.

[25]  E. Hizsnyik,et al.  Biofuels and Food Security: Implications of an Accelerated Biofuels Production , 2009 .

[26]  S. Bringezu,et al.  Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of maize-biogas and photovoltaics on a land use basis , 2010 .

[27]  J. Melillo,et al.  Indirect Emissions from Biofuels: How Important? , 2009, Science.

[28]  Marc Londo,et al.  Bioenergy: a sustainable and reliable energy source. A review of status and prospects. , 2009 .

[29]  Anselm Eisentraut,et al.  Sustainable Production of Second-Generation Biofuels: Potential and Perspectives in Major Economies and Developing Countries , 2010 .

[30]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Unintended Environmental Consequences of a Global Biofuels Program , 2009 .

[31]  J. Neufeld,et al.  The State of Food and Agriculture , 1970 .

[32]  G. Reinhardt,et al.  Synopsis of current models and methods applicable to indirect land use change (ILUC) , 2009 .

[33]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.