Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors

An eye movement experiment is reported in which target words of two and four letters were presented in sentences that strongly raised the expectation of a particular word. There were three possible conditions: The expected word was present in the sentence, an unexpected word of the same length was present, or an unexpected word of a different length was present (all continuations were acceptable, but the latter two were difficult to predict). Our first purpose was to test one of the core assumptions of the Extended Optimal Viewing Position model of eye guidance in reading (Brysbaert & Vitu, 1998). This model states that word skipping is primarily a function of the length of the upcoming word. It leads to the prediction that an unpredicted two‐letter word will be skipped more often than a predicted four‐letter word, which is indeed what we observed. Our second aim was to determine if we could obtain an interaction between context predictability and parafoveal word length, by looking at what happens when the length of the parafoveal word does not agree with the length of the expected word. No such interaction was observed although the effects of both word length and predictability were substantial. These findings are interpreted as evidence for the hypothesis that visual and language‐related factors independently affect word skipping.

[1]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. , 1992 .

[2]  K. Rayner,et al.  Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  J. Henderson,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[4]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements during reading: some current controversies , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  R. E. Morrison,et al.  Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Julian Hochberg.  On the control of saccades in reading , 1975, Vision Research.

[7]  J. O'Regan.  Optimal Viewing Position in Words and the Strategy-Tactics Theory of Eye Movements in Reading , 1992 .

[8]  G. McConkie,et al.  What guides a reader's eye movements? , 1976, Vision Research.

[9]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  The European Society for Cognitive Psychology , 1999 .

[10]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words , 2001, Vision Research.

[12]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movement guidance in reading: the role of parafoveal letter and space information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  G. McConkie,et al.  Eye movements during reading: a theory of saccade initiation times , 2001, Vision Research.

[14]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  D. Balota,et al.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  H Herman Bouma,et al.  On the control of eye saccades in reading , 1974 .

[17]  M Carreiras,et al.  Inferences about predictable events: eye movements during reading , 2001, Psychological research.

[18]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The Right Visual Field Advantage and the Optimal Viewing Position Effect : On the Relation Between Foveal and Parafoveal Word Recognition , 1996 .

[19]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  The existence of a center of gravity effect during reading , 1991, Vision Research.

[20]  Geert Booij,et al.  Yearbook of Morphology 1993 , 1993 .

[21]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990 .

[22]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[23]  G. Underwood.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[24]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model , 1999, Vision Research.

[25]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Local and global sources of contextual facilitation in reading , 1987 .

[27]  Keith Rayner.  Eye Movements in Reading , 2001 .

[28]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Access and integration: projecting sound onto meaning , 1989 .

[29]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Distinct Subsystems for the Parafoveal Processing of Spatial and Linguistic Information during Eye Fixations in Reading , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[30]  Vera Kempe,et al.  An individual analysis of initial fixation positions in reading. , 1993 .

[31]  R. Radach,et al.  Chapter 7 – Relations Between Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Eye Movement Control , 2000 .

[32]  K. Rayner.  Eye Guidance in Reading: Fixation Locations within Words , 1979, Perception.

[33]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  M. G. Calvo,et al.  Eye Movements and Processing Stages in Reading: Relative Contribution of Visual, Lexical, and Contextual Factors , 2002, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[37]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[38]  Thomas W. Hogaboam,et al.  18 – Reading Patterns in Eye Movement Data , 1983 .

[39]  P. Kerr,et al.  Eye Movement Control During Reading: The Selection of Where to Send the Eyes , 1992 .

[40]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  J. O'Regan.  Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[42]  H. Blanchard,et al.  The acquisition of parafoveal word information in reading , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  Eileen Kowler.  Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[44]  K. Rayner.  The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading , 1998 .

[46]  M D Reddix,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[48]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Modifier Attachment in Sentence Parsing: Evidence from Dutch , 1996 .

[49]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .

[50]  K. Rayner,et al.  Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .

[51]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Chapter 11 – Eye Movement Control in Reading: An Overview and Model , 1998 .

[52]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes , 1989 .

[53]  J. Rensbergen,et al.  Perception and cognition : advances in eye movement research , 1995 .

[54]  D. Balota,et al.  Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  R. Walker,et al.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[56]  G. McConkie,et al.  Regressive Saccades and Word Perception in Adult Reading , 2000 .

[57]  J. Kroll,et al.  The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[58]  J. Stern.  Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research A. G. Gale and F. Johnson, (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1984) pp. xiii + 565, Dfl. 185 , 1985, Biological Psychology.

[59]  P. W. Kerr,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words , 1987, Vision Research.

[60]  J. Hyönä.  Effects of thematic and lexical priming on readers' eye movements. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[61]  James J. Clark,et al.  Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading , 1999, Vision Research.

[62]  W. Vonk,et al.  Eye Movements During Comprehension of Pronouns , 1984 .

[63]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Eye Movement Control during Reading: Foveal Load and Parafoveal Processing , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[64]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing , 2002, Vision Research.

[65]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Chapter 3 – Eye Movements and Measures of Reading Time , 1998 .

[66]  Treebank Penn,et al.  Linguistic Data Consortium , 1999 .