Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue predictions in orthognathic surgery after Le Fort I advancement osteotomies.

Prediction of postoperative facial appearance after orthognathic surgery can be used for communication, managing patients' expectations,avoiding postoperative dissatisfaction and exploring different treatment options. We have assessed the accuracy of 3dMD Vultus in predicting the final 3-dimensional soft tissue facial morphology after Le Fort I advancement osteotomy. We retrospectively studied 13 patients who were treated with a Le Fort I advancement osteotomy alone. We used routine cone-beam computed tomographic (CT) images taken immediately before and a minimum of 6 months after operation, and 3dMD Vultus to virtually reposition the preoperative maxilla and mandible in their post operative positions to generate a prediction of what the soft tissue would look like. Segmented anatomical areas of the predicted mesh were then compared with the actual soft tissue. The means of the absolute distance between the 90th percentile of the mesh points for each region were calculated, and a one-sample Student's t test was used to calculate if the difference differed significantly from 3 mm.The differences in the mean absolute distances between the actual soft tissue and the prediction were significantly below 3 mm for all segmented anatomical areas (p < 0.001), and ranged from 0.65 mm (chin) to 1.17 mm (upper lip). 3dMD Vultus produces clinically satisfactory 3-dimensional facial soft tissue predictions after Le Fort I advancement osteotomy. The mass-spring model for prediction seems to be able to predict the position of the lip and chin, but its ability to predict nasal and paranasal areas could be improved.

[1]  B. Khambay,et al.  Current methods of assessing the accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue facial predictions: technical and clinical considerations. , 2015, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  A. Ayoub,et al.  The validity of a computer-assisted simulation system for orthognathic surgery (CASSOS) for planning the surgical correction of class III skeletal deformities: single-jaw versus bimaxillary surgery. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  K. Sayınsu,et al.  An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings. , 2007, European journal of orthodontics.

[4]  J. Rugh,et al.  Patients' own reasons and patient-perceived recommendations for orthognathic surgery. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  C. Combescure,et al.  Accuracy of Computational Soft Tissue Predictions in Orthognathic Surgery From Three-Dimensional Photographs 6 Months After Completion of Surgery: A Preliminary Study of 13 Patients , 2014, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[6]  A. Ayoub,et al.  The accuracy of three-dimensional prediction planning for the surgical correction of facial deformities using Maxilim. , 2013, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[7]  Azita Tehranchi,et al.  Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  A Sarti,et al.  Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning. , 2011, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[9]  S. Schendel,et al.  3-dimensional facial simulation in orthognathic surgery: is it accurate? , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  X Ju,et al.  The virtual human face: superimposing the simultaneously captured 3D photorealistic skin surface of the face on the untextured skin image of the CBCT scan. , 2013, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[11]  Alessandro Sarti,et al.  Facial soft tissue esthetic predictions: validation in craniomaxillofacial surgery with cone beam computed tomography data. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  I. Garcia,et al.  Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  Ole Donatsky,et al.  Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system. , 2009, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[14]  Jean-Christophe Nebel,et al.  3D stereophotogrammetric image superimposition onto 3D CT scan images: the future of orthognathic surgery. A pilot study. , 2002, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[15]  S. Drew,et al.  Motivating factors for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery evaluation. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[16]  D. Sarver Video-imaging and treatment presentation: medico-legal implications and patient perception. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Orthognathic surgery: patient expectations; psychological profile and satisfaction with outcome. , 1995, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[18]  Huanchong Cheng,et al.  Image Fusion in Craniofacial Virtual Reality Modeling Based on CT and 3dMD Photogrammetry , 2013, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[19]  M. Stamminger,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of changes of the malar–midfacial region after LeFort I osteotomy and maxillary advancement , 2008, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

[20]  F. Mcdonald,et al.  A radiographic analysis of computer prediction in conjunction with orthognathic surgery. , 2001, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[21]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Predicting soft tissue deformations for a maxillofacial surgery planning system: From computational strategies to a complete clinical validation , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  Susan J Cunningham,et al.  How predictable is orthognathic surgery? , 2004, European journal of orthodontics.

[23]  Thomas J J Maal,et al.  Registration of 3-dimensional facial photographs for clinical use. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.