Research trends in student response systems: a literature review

In recent years, the use of student response systems SRS, also known as clickers in the classroom setting has increased considerably, and researchers have developed a growing interest in their effect on learning and student engagement. This review analyses trends in SRS research by providing a brief history of SRS technology and usage as well as a detailed review of research in this field. In addition, this review focuses on the pedagogical implications of SRSs for education and analyses common criticisms of this emerging educational technology. Finally, research identifying common trends in SRS development is compiled and areas for future research are identified. The outcome of this leads to an understanding of best practices for this technology in a university setting.

[1]  Lorena Blasco-Arcas,et al.  Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[2]  James Oigara,et al.  Interdisciplinary Journal of E-learning and Learning Objects Teaching and Learning with Clickers: Are Clickers Good for Students? , 2022 .

[3]  Marie Kavanagh,et al.  Click Go the Students, Click-Click-Click: The Efficacy of a Student Response System for Engaging Students to Improve Feedback and Performance , 2009 .

[4]  Alan Green.  Significant Returns in Engagement and Performance with a Free Clicker App , 2014 .

[5]  Gillian Lancaster,et al.  Personal Response Systems for Teaching Postgraduate Statistics to Small Groups , 2011 .

[6]  Kathleen Koenig,et al.  Building Acceptance for Pedagogical Reform through Wide-Scale Implementation of Clickers. , 2010 .

[7]  Jae Hoon Han,et al.  Closing the Missing Links and Opening the Relationships among the Factors: A Literature Review on the Use of Clicker Technology Using the 3P Model , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  Jeffrey R. Stowell,et al.  Use of clickers vs. mobile devices for classroom polling , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Lisa Hartling,et al.  The effects of audience response systems on learning outcomes in health professions education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 21 , 2012, Medical teacher.

[10]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[11]  Jae Hoon Han,et al.  Unpacking and repacking the factors affecting students' perceptions of the use of classroom communication systems (CCS) technology , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Alf Inge Wang,et al.  The wear out effect of a game-based student response system , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Kevin Johnson,et al.  Clickers in the Laboratory: Student Thoughts and Views , 2010 .

[14]  Michael E. Lantz,et al.  Effectiveness of clickers: Effect of feedback and the timing of questions on learning , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Kjetil L. Nielsen,et al.  Teaching with student response systems (SRS): teacher-centric aspects that can negatively affect students' experience of using SRS , 2013 .

[16]  Ian D. Beatty.  Transforming Student Learning with Classroom Communication Systems , 2005, physics/0508129.

[17]  Adam Finkelstein,et al.  Understanding the effects of professors' pedagogical development with Clicker Assessment and Feedback technologies and the impact on students' engagement and learning in higher education , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[18]  John Barnett,et al.  Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: Student perceptions , 2006 .

[19]  Christine McDonald,et al.  CRiSP: An Instrument for Assessing Student Perceptions of Classroom Response Systems , 2015 .

[20]  Kumar Laxman,et al.  A study on the adoption of clickers in higher education , 2011 .

[21]  Scott R. Homan,et al.  Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes , 2008 .

[22]  Greet Langie,et al.  Replacement of a clicker system by a mobile device audience response system , 2013 .

[23]  Angel Rebecca Hoekstra.  A Socio-Cultural Analysis of the Use of Clickers in Higher Education. , 2009 .

[24]  Tzy-Ling Chen,et al.  Using a personal response system as an in-class assessment tool in the teaching of basic college chemistry , 2013 .

[25]  Amanda Jefferies,et al.  The benefits and challenges of large-scale deployment of electronic voting systems: University student views from across different subject groups , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Christine McDonald,et al.  Mobile-phone-based classroom response systems: Students’ perceptions of engagement and learning in a large undergraduate course , 2013 .

[27]  Daiyo Sawada,et al.  Audience Response Systems: Insipid Contrivances or Inspiring Tools? , 2006 .

[28]  Louis Abrahamson.  A Brief History of Networked Classrooms: Effects, Cases, Pedagogy, and Implications , 2006 .

[29]  Claes Wohlin,et al.  Systematic literature studies: Database searches vs. backward snowballing , 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement.

[30]  William M. Hedgcock,et al.  Clicking Their Way to Success: Using Student Response Systems as a Tool for Feedback , 2014 .

[31]  Chad Habel,et al.  Mobile phone voting for participation and engagement in a large compulsory law course , 2014 .

[32]  N. Sharon Hill,et al.  Preference for Anonymous Classroom Participation , 2014 .

[33]  Ruey S. Shieh,et al.  Implementing the Interactive Response System in a High School Physics Context: Intervention and Reflections. , 2013 .

[34]  Kevin Wong,et al.  Classroom communication on mobile phones – first experiences with web-based ‘clicker’ system , 2011 .

[35]  R. A. Kendrick,et al.  Using an Audience Response System (ARS) a.k.a. “clicker” to do attention research , 2010 .

[36]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Alan Farley,et al.  Mobile Phone-Based Audience Response System and Student Engagement In Large-Group Teaching , 2012 .