Texture Segmentation by Statistical Deformable Models

Deformable models have received much popularity due to their ability to include high-level knowledge on the application domain into low-level image processing. Still, most proposed active contour models do not sufficiently profit from the application information and they are too generalized, leading to non-optimal final results of segmentation, tracking or 3D reconstruction processes. In this paper we propose a new deformable model defined in a statistical framework to segment objects of natural scenes. We perform a supervised learning of local appearance of the textured objects and construct a feature space using a set of co-occurrence matrix measures. Linear Discriminant Analysis allows us to obtain an optimal reduced feature space where a mixture model is applied to construct a likelihood map. Instead of using a heuristic potential field, our active model is deformed on a regularized version of the likelihood map in order to segment objects characterized by the same texture pattern. Different tests on synthetic images, natural scene and medical images show the advantages of our statistic deformable model.

[1]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Tracking with Kalman snakes , 1993 .

[2]  Béla Julesz,et al.  Visual Pattern Discrimination , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Segmentation of intravascular ultrasound images: a knowledge-based approach , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  Trygve Randen,et al.  Filtering for Texture Classification: A Comparative Study , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Unifying boundary and region-based information for geodesic active tracking , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[6]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[8]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Gradient vector flow: a new external force for snakes , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Jian Fan,et al.  Frame representations for texture segmentation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[10]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Unsupervised Texture Segmentation Using Markov Random Field Models , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Region competition: unifying snakes, region growing, energy/Bayes/MDL for multi-band image segmentation , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[12]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[13]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Appearance Models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  G. MallatS. A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition , 1989 .

[15]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Texture classification and segmentation using multiresolution simultaneous autoregressive models , 1992, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters , 1990, 1990 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings.

[17]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Generalized gradient vector flow external forces for active contours , 1998, Signal Process..

[18]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Non-parametric similarity measures for unsupervised texture segmentation and image retrieval , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[19]  V. Caselles,et al.  A geometric model for active contours in image processing , 1993 .

[20]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  T-snakes: Topology adaptive snakes , 2000, Medical Image Anal..

[21]  Richard C. Dubes,et al.  Performance evaluation for four classes of textural features , 1992, Pattern Recognit..

[22]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Geodesic active contours for supervised texture segmentation , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[23]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  A NEW EXTERNAL FORCE MODEL FOR SNAKES , 1996 .

[24]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[25]  Bidyut Baran Chaudhuri,et al.  Texture Segmentation Using Fractal Dimension , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[26]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  Region Competition: Unifying Snakes, Region Growing, and Bayes/MDL for Multiband Image Segmentation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[27]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Contour and Texture Analysis for Image Segmentation , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[28]  Johan Montagnat,et al.  Shape and Topology Constraints on Parametric Active Contours , 2001, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[29]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  A computational model of texture segmentation , 1989, Proceedings CVPR '89: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[30]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Bayesian modeling of uncertainty in low-level vision , 2011, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[31]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[32]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Unsupervised Texture Segmentation in a Deterministic Annealing Framework , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[33]  Laurent D. Cohen,et al.  On active contour models and balloons , 1991, CVGIP Image Underst..