State estimation in wall-bounded flow systems. Part 1. Perturbed laminar flows

In applications involving the model-based control of transitional wall-bounded flow systems, it is often desired to estimate the interior flow state based on a history of noisy measurements from an array of flush-mounted skin-friction and pressure sensors on the wall. This paper considers this estimation problem, using a Kalman filter based on the linearized Navier–Stokes equations and appropriate stochastic models for the relevant statistics of the initial conditions, sensor noise and external disturbances acting on the system. We show that a physically relevant parameterization of these statistics is key to obtaining well-resolved feedback kernels with appropriate spatial extent for all three types of flow measurement available on the wall. The effectiveness of the resulting Kalman and extended Kalman filters that implement this feedback is verified for both infinitesimal and finite-amplitude disturbances in direct numerical simulations of a perturbed laminar channel flow. The consideration of time-varying feedback kernels is shown to be particularly advantageous in accelerating the convergence of the estimator from unknown initial conditions. A companion paper (Part 2) considers the extension of such estimators to the case of fully developed turbulence.

[1]  T. Bewley,et al.  Skin friction and pressure: the “footprints” of turbulence , 2004 .

[2]  Dan S. Henningson,et al.  Linear feedback control and estimation of transition in plane channel flow , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  John Kim,et al.  Control of turbulent boundary layers , 2003 .

[4]  B. Bamieh,et al.  Modeling flow statistics using the linearized Navier-Stokes equations , 2001, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228).

[5]  B. Bamieh,et al.  The spatio-temporal impulse response of the linearized Navier-Stokes equations , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[6]  Thomas Bewley,et al.  Flow control: new challenges for a new Renaissance , 2001 .

[7]  Satish C. Reddy,et al.  A MATLAB differentiation matrix suite , 2000, TOMS.

[8]  Junwoo Lim,et al.  A linear process in wall-bounded turbulent shear flows , 2000 .

[9]  Sanjay S. Joshi,et al.  Finite Dimensional Optimal Control of Poiseuille Flow , 1999 .

[10]  Thomas Bewley,et al.  Optimal and robust control and estimation of linear paths to transition , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  R. Goodman,et al.  Application of neural networks to turbulence control for drag reduction , 1997 .

[12]  P. Schmid,et al.  Transient growth in compressible boundary layer flow , 1996 .

[13]  Petros G. Voulgaris,et al.  On optimal ℓ∞ to ℓ∞ filtering , 1995, Autom..

[14]  D. Henningson,et al.  A mechanism for bypass transition from localized disturbances in wall-bounded shear flows , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Dan S. Henningson,et al.  An efficient spectral integration method for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations , 1992 .

[16]  A. Laub Invariant Subspace Methods for the Numerical Solution of Riccati Equations , 1991 .

[17]  Andrew S. W. Thomas Active wave control of boundary-layer transition , 1990 .

[18]  Max Gunzburger,et al.  Perspectives in flow control and optimization , 1987 .

[19]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Some new algorithms for recursive estimation in constant linear systems , 1973, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.