Recycling and Waste Diversion Effectiveness: Evidence from Canada

In this paper, we investigate the relationship between recycling policy options and recycling behavior to study the most effective methods of diverting post-consumer waste from landfills. We employ data from a unique, micro-data set collected from households in communities across Ontario, Canada. We estimate the relationships between several commonly recycled materials (newsprint, glass, plastics, aluminum cans, tin cans, cardboard, and toxic chemicals) and individual household characteristics, recycling program attributes, and garbage collection financing methods. We find that user fees on garbage collection have significant impacts on recycling levels for all materials except toxic chemicals, and mandatory recycling programs on particular items have significant effects on recycling for almost all materials. Limits on the amount of garbage that can be placed at the curb, and providing free units under user fee systems, however, generally have a negligible or detrimental impact on recycling.

[1]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Household Responses to Pricing Garbage by the Bag , 1994 .

[2]  Said Atri,et al.  Efficient Management of Household Solid Waste: a General Equilibrium Model , 1995 .

[3]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Garbage, Recycling, and Illicit Burning or Dumping , 1993 .

[4]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Garbage and Recycling with Endogenous Local Policy , 2000 .

[5]  Ida Ferrara,et al.  Differential Provision of Solid Waste Collection Services in the Presence of Heterogeneous Households , 2003 .

[6]  Vincent Linderhof,et al.  Weight-based pricing in the collection of household waste: the Oostzaan case , 2001 .

[7]  Scott J. Callan,et al.  The Impact of State and Local Policies on the Recycling Effort , 1997 .

[8]  T. Dinan,et al.  Economic Efficiency Effects of Alternative Policies for Reducing Waste Disposal , 1993 .

[9]  Marie Lynn Miranda,et al.  Unit pricing of residential municipal solid waste: lessons from nine case study communities , 1998 .

[10]  Robin R. Jenkins,et al.  The Determinants of Household Recycling: A Material Specific Analysis of Recycling Program Features and Unit Pricing , 2003 .

[11]  T. Sterner,et al.  Household Waste Management in a Swedish Municipality: Determinants of Waste Disposal, Recycling and Composting , 1999 .

[12]  Vijaya G. Duggal,et al.  Income and the recycling effort: a maximization problem , 1993 .

[13]  Scott J. Callan,et al.  Adopting a Unit Pricing System for Municipal Solid Waste: Policy and Socio-Economic Determinants , 1999 .

[14]  Michael J. Podolsky,et al.  Assessing Incentive‐Based Environmental Policies For Reducing Household Waste Disposal , 1998 .

[15]  Richard M. Adams,et al.  Household Responses to Price Incentives for Recycling: Some Further Evidence , 1999 .

[16]  K. Wertz,et al.  Economic factors influencing households' production of refuse , 1976 .

[17]  James D. Reschovsky,et al.  Market incentives to encourage household waste recycling: Paying for what you throw away , 1994 .

[18]  Robin R. Jenkins.  The Economics of Solid Waste Reduction: The Impact of User Fees , 1993 .

[19]  Richard M. Adams,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Household Recycling of Solid Wastes: The Case of Portland, Oregon , 1993 .

[20]  Hilary A. Sigman,et al.  The Cost of Reducing Municipal Solid Waste , 1997 .

[21]  George Van Houtven,et al.  Household Behavior Under Alternative Pay-As- You-Throw Systems for Solid Waste Disposal , 1999 .