Observing a web based learning activity: a knowledge oriented approach

Technologically Enhanced Learning (TEL) potential has been demonstrated since the very beginning of computer science history [Skinner, 1965]. Two different points of view emerged: Skinner proposed to automate the transmissive tasks of the teacher; Piaget, on the contrary, proposed harness TEL to associate learners in the learning process according to the developmental learning theory (see [Kolb, 1984] and [Rezeau, 2001] for details). These two approaches were already deeply discussed in 1964 [Oleron, 1964]. In both theories, and since the very beginning, TEL environments were used to provide learning activities selected according to some learning strategies, and taking into account the productions of the learner and, in a more general way, his/her behavior. The goal was to “automatically” guide the learner throughout the learning process. In order to provide such guidance, these environments had to incorporate observation tools for monitoring learning activities. These tools were used to assess learners' progress and to guide the learning activities accordingly. Observations collected in TEL environments have to be modeled and represented so that they can be further reused by digital systems for various tasks such as assessment, diagnosis, adaptation, rewarding, panification, etc. It should be noted that the observation of a learning process goes way beyond TEL environments. Even in situations where no TEL are involved, teachers make observations, record them and reuse them for pedagogical purposes. Even if the observation of a learning process has always played a central part in pedagogical practices, research on that topic has not always been very active. For some years now, observation and dynamical (and sometimes real-time) exploitation of these observation is a research question of a growing importance. With the multiplication of MOOCs (Massive Online Open Courses), this research question becomes even more important and raises new challenges such as the ability to observe thousands of learners involved in the same learning activity and to build relevant knowledge and services based on these observations. Among these elements, we can list: indicators, dashboards, learner profiles, etc. Learner profiles are often built for teachers and tutors, but some systems make an effort to make their semantics clear for learners too (see for example The Observer 1 ). There is a very significant literature on the subject of making easier the exploitation of this knowledge in the classroom, specifically in connection with learners profiles engineering [Brusilovsky & Millan, 2007], [Ginon et al, 2011]. In this paper, we address “observation” as a research question. More precisely, we study the concepts underlying instrumentation, collection and representation of observations in web based TEL environments. We develop models and tools according to this conceptualization. Obviously, observation and interpretation are strongly related. In the literature, it is generally admitted that “interpretation knowledge” is an abstract knowledge. Thus, the question raised is “how to connect this abstract level knowledge to low level observations?”. Establishing such a connection often lead to the implementation of top-down ad hoc observation processes, deeply integrated in TEL environments. Top-down approaches for implementing observation mechanisms are rather complex to implement (see recommendations of the Alberta University for building profiles 2 ), and some researchers, such as [Choquet & Iksal, 2007], propose to integrate specification of what has to be observed in the authoring process in order to elaborate learning indicator.

[1]  Yannick Prié,et al.  An approach to User-Centric Context-Aware Assistance based on Interaction Traces , 2008 .

[2]  Alejandro Peña-Ayala Review: Educational data mining: A survey and a data mining-based analysis of recent works , 2014 .

[3]  Pierre-Antoine Champin,et al.  aLDEAS : un langage de définition de systèmes d'assistance épiphytes , 2014, IC.

[4]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Predicting User Tasks : I Know What You ’ re Doing ! , 2005 .

[5]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Supporting activity modelling from activity traces , 2012, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[6]  Alain Mille,et al.  Visualizing Interaction Traces to improve Reflexivity in Synchronous Collaborative e-Learning Activities , 2007 .

[7]  Tyler Reigeluth Why data is not enough: Digital traces as control of self and self-control , 2014 .

[8]  Stéphanie Jean-Daubias,et al.  Evolutive learners profiles , 2011 .

[9]  Élise Gendron,et al.  Cadre conceptuel pour l'élaboration d'indicateurs de collaboration à partir des traces d'activité. (Framework for the elaboration of collaboration indicators from activity traces) , 2010 .

[10]  A. Cooper Interoperability-a survey of current literature and candidate standards , 2013 .

[11]  Michelle Taub,et al.  Adaptive Multi-Agent Architecture to Track Students' Self-Regulated Learning , 2013, AIED Workshops.

[12]  Abdelkrim Bekkhoucha,et al.  ON MODELING TRACES IN A COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT FOR HUMAN LEARNING BASED INDICATORS , 2013 .

[13]  Zachary A. Pardos,et al.  MOOCdb: Developing Data Standards for MOOC Data Science , 2013 .

[14]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges , 2012 .

[15]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  User Models for Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Educational Systems , 2007, The Adaptive Web.

[16]  R. Azevedo Computer Environments as Metacognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning , 2005 .

[17]  Camille Salinesi,et al.  AIS Electronic , 2022 .

[18]  Pierre-Antoine Champin,et al.  Trace-Based Reasoning - Modeling Interaction Traces for Reasoning on Experiences , 2013, FLAIRS Conference.

[19]  B. Skinner Review Lecture - The technology of teaching , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[20]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Design and evaluation of systems to support interaction capture and retrieval , 2008, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[21]  J. Rézeau Médiatisation et médiation pédagogique dans un environnement multimédia : Le cas de l'apprentissage de l'anglais en Histoire de l'Art à l'université , 2001 .

[22]  Claude Kirchner,et al.  Massively Open Online Courses, Current State and Perspectives (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 14112) , 2014, Dagstuhl Reports.

[23]  Sébastien George,et al.  DDART, a Dynamic Dashboard for Collection, Analysis and Visualization of Activity and Reporting Traces , 2014, EC-TEL.

[24]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[25]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Promoting reflective interactions in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 1997 .

[26]  Christophe Choquet,et al.  Modeling Tracks for the Model Driven Re-engineering of a TEL System , 2006 .

[27]  Faiçal Azouaou,et al.  ESITrace: A User Side Trace and Annotation Collection Tool , 2012, ICWL Workshops.

[28]  Oleg Zaitsev Skeleton keys: the purpose and applications of keyloggers , 2010, Netw. Secur..