Short-term recovery of soil physical, chemical, micro- and mesobiological functions in a new vineyard under organic farming

Abstract. Deep earthwork activities carried out before vineyard plantation can severely affect soil profile properties. As a result, soil features in the root environment are often much more similar to those of the underlying substratum than those of the original profile. The time needed to recover the original soil functions is ecologically relevant and may strongly affect vine phenology and grape yield, particularly under organic viticulture. The general aim of this work was to investigate soil resilience after vineyard pre-planting earthworks. In particular, an old and a new vineyard, established on the same soil type, were compared over a 5-year period for soil chemical, physical, micro- and mesobiological properties. The investigated vineyards (Vitis vinifera L., cv. Sangiovese) were located in the Chianti Classico district (central Italy), on stony and calcareous soils, and were not irrigated. The older vineyard was planted in 2000, after slope reshaping by bulldozing and back-hoe ploughing down to about 0.8–1.0 m. The new vineyard was planted in 2011, after equivalent earthwork practices carried out in the summer of 2009. Both vineyards were organically managed, and they were fertilized with compost only every autumn (1000 kg ha−1 per year). The new vineyard was cultivated by periodic tillage, while the old vineyard was managed with alternating grass-covered and tilled inter-rows. Soil samples were collected at 0–15 cm depth from fixed locations in each vineyard every spring from 2010 to 2014. The old vineyard was sampled in both tilled and grass-covered inter-rows. According to the results from physical and chemical analyses, the new vineyard, during the whole 2010–2014 period, showed lower total organic carbon, total nitrogen, carbon to nitrogen ratio and electrical conductivity, along with higher silt and total CaCO3 contents than the old vineyard, suggesting still-evolving equilibrium conditions. The microarthropod analysis showed significantly different abundances and community structures, in relation to both vineyard and time. Rainfall appeared to have an enhancing effect on microarthropod abundance, but only in the old vineyard, where the biota was more structured than in the new one. The euedaphic forms, well adapted to soil life, were always rare. Microbiological analysis revealed a different structure of eubacterial communities between the old and the new vineyard in the whole period. However, the DGGE similarity values of these communities increased by about 2.5% per year, suggesting that at least 3 years more are needed to compare intra- and inter-specific diversity of the two vineyards. In conclusion, the consequences of deep earthworks on soil chemical, micro- and mesobiological properties were still evident 4 years after planting, indicating that more time is necessary for the recovery of soil functions, probably longer than the time needed to reach a state of economically viable grape production.

[1]  W. Russell Hamon Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration , 1960 .

[2]  C. Gardi,et al.  Microarthropod communities as a tool to assess soil quality and biodiversity: a new approach in Italy , 2005 .

[3]  P. Fitze,et al.  Quantitative aspects of carbonate leaching of soils with differing ages and climates , 2001 .

[4]  G. Eisenbeis,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF ORGANICALLY MANAGED VINEYARD-SOILS ON THE PHYLLOXERA-POPULATIONS AND THE VIGOUR OF GRAPEVINES , 2003 .

[5]  Noah Fierer,et al.  Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth profiles , 2003 .

[6]  L N Csonka,et al.  Physiological and genetic responses of bacteria to osmotic stress. , 1989, Microbiological reviews.

[7]  Emmanuelle Vaudour,et al.  The Quality of Grapes and Wine in Relation to Geography: Notions of Terroir at Various Scales , 2002 .

[8]  P. Bazzoffi,et al.  Effectiveness of the GAEC standard of cross compliance Prohibition of performing unauthorized land levelling on soil erosion control , 2011 .

[9]  A. Reinecke,et al.  The effects of organic and conventional management practices on feeding activity of soil organisms in vineyards , 2008 .

[10]  C. van Leeuwen,et al.  The concept of terroir in viticulture , 2006 .

[11]  M. C. Ramos,et al.  Soil loss and soil water content affected by land levelling in Penedès vineyards, NE Spain , 2007 .

[12]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Digging deeper to find unique microbial communities: The strong effect of depth on the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in soil , 2012 .

[13]  Robert E. White,et al.  Soils for Fine Wines , 2003 .

[14]  Y. Le Bissonnais,et al.  Erodibility of Mediterranean vineyard soils: relevant aggregate stability methods and significant soil variables , 2007 .

[15]  Cornelis van Leeuwen,et al.  Influence of Climate, Soil, and Cultivar on Terroir , 2004, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[16]  J. Herrick,et al.  SOIL RESILIENCE: A FUNDAMENTAL COMPONENT OF SOIL QUALITY , 1999 .

[17]  R. Lal,et al.  Importance of soil quality to health and sustainable land management. , 1996 .

[18]  Donald L. Suarez,et al.  Carbonate and Gypsum , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[19]  Silong Wang,et al.  A soil fauna index for assessing soil quality , 2012 .

[20]  Joël Daroussin,et al.  Mapping erosion risk for cultivated soil in France , 2002 .

[21]  Edoardo A.C. Costantini,et al.  Environmental and visual impact analysis of viticulture and olive tree cultivation in the province of Siena (Italy) , 2008 .

[22]  S. Pellegrini,et al.  Unexpected relationships between δ 13 C and wine grape performance in organic farming , 2013 .

[23]  B. Robinson,et al.  Soil disturbance and salinisation on a vineyard affected by landscape recontouring in Marlborough, New Zealand , 2014 .

[24]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Communities and Ecosystems: Linking the Aboveground and Belowground Components , 2002 .

[25]  Influence of Climate , 1965 .

[26]  D. Sparks,et al.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical methods. , 1996 .

[27]  J. M. Johnston,et al.  The Contribution of Microarthropods to Aboveground Food Webs: A Review and Model of Belowground Transfer in a Coniferous Forest , 2000 .

[28]  J. Trevors,et al.  Bacterial survival in soil: Effect of clays and protozoa , 1993 .

[29]  R. Lal,et al.  Degradation and resilience of soils , 1997 .

[30]  H. Isermeyer Eine einfache Methode zur Bestimmung der Bodenatmung und der Karbonate im Boden , 1952 .

[31]  M. Paoletti,et al.  Soil Invertebrates as Bioindicators of Human Disturbance , 1996 .

[32]  A. Felske,et al.  Spatial Homogeneity of Abundant Bacterial 16S rRNA Molecules in Grassland Soils , 1998, Microbial Ecology.

[33]  G. Tian,et al.  Abundance of springtails (Collembola) under four agroforestry tree species with contrasting litter quality , 1998, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[34]  M. Hassall,et al.  Vertical migration of Onychiurus subtenuis (Collembola) in relation to rainfall and microbial activity , 1986, Pedobiologia.

[35]  José A. Martínez-Casasnovas,et al.  Nutrient losses by runoff in vineyards of the Mediterranean Alt Penedès region (NE Spain) , 2006 .

[36]  Edoardo A.C. Costantini,et al.  Quaternary landscape history determines the soil functional characters of terroir , 2012 .

[37]  L. Ledda,et al.  Soil organic matter content and composition as influenced by soil management in a semi-arid Mediterranean agro-silvo-pastoral system , 2013 .

[38]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Principles of Soil Conservation and Management , 2008 .

[39]  C. Gardi,et al.  Nematode and Microarthropod Communities: Comparative Use of Soil Quality Bioindicators in Covered Dump and Natural Soils , 2008 .

[40]  G. Muyzer,et al.  Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[41]  A. Squartini,et al.  Soil biological and biochemical traits linked to nutritional status in grapevine , 2014 .

[42]  Jaap Bloem,et al.  Microbiological methods for assessing soil quality , 2005 .

[43]  T. W. Culliney Role of Arthropods in Maintaining Soil Fertility , 2013 .

[44]  G. Berta,et al.  Microbiological polyphasic approach for soil health evaluation in an Italian polluted site. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[45]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Effects of water addition on soil arthropods and soil characteristics in a precipitation-limited environment , 2006 .

[46]  P. Nannipieri,et al.  Microbial diversity and soil functions , 2003 .

[47]  L. H. Sørensen The influence of stress treatments on the microbial biomass and the rate of decomposition of humified matter in soils containing different amoutns of clay , 1983, Plant and Soil.

[48]  R. Joergensen,et al.  Vineyard soils under organic and conventional management—microbial biomass and activity indices and their relation to soil chemical properties , 2008, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[49]  P. Bazzoffi,et al.  Impact of land levelling for vineyard plantation on soil degradation in Italy , 2006 .

[50]  Khan Towhid Osman,et al.  Soils: Principles, Properties and Management , 2012 .

[51]  J. Martínez-Casasnovas,et al.  Soil alteration due to erosion, ploughing and levelling of vineyards in north east Spain , 2009 .

[52]  E. Costantini,et al.  The Soils of Italy , 2013 .

[53]  S. Pellegrini,et al.  Soil particle-size analysis up to 250 μm by X-ray granulometer: Device set-up and regressions for data conversion into pipette-equivalent values , 2013 .

[54]  J. García‐Ruiz,et al.  The effects of land uses on soil erosion in Spain: A review , 2010 .

[55]  F. Ellmer,et al.  Abundance and biodiversity of soil microarthropods as influenced by different types of organic manure in a long-term field experiment in Central Spain , 2006 .