Positive affect and learning: exploring the “Eureka Effect” in dogs

AbstractAnimals may experience positive affective states in response to their own achievements. We investigated emotional responses to problem-solving in dogs, separating these from reactions to rewards per se using a yoked control design. We also questioned whether the intensity of reaction would vary with reward type. We examined the response (behavior and heart rate) of dogs as they learned to gain access to different rewards: (1) food (2) human contact, and (3) dog contact. Twelve beagles were assigned to matched pairs, and each dog served as both an experimental and a control animal during different stages of the experiment. We trained all dogs to perform distinct operant tasks and exposed them to additional devices to which they were not trained. Later, dogs were tested in a new context. When acting as an experimental dog, access to the reward was granted immediately upon completion of trained operant tasks. When acting as a control, access to the reward was independent of the dog’s actions and was instead granted after a delay equal to their matched partner’s latency to complete their task. Thus, differences between the two situations could be attributed to experimental dogs having the opportunity to learn to control access to the reward. Experimental dogs showed signs of excitement (e.g., increased tail wagging and activity) in response to their achievements, whereas controls showed signs of frustration (e.g., chewing of the operant device) in response to the unpredictability of the situation. The intensity of emotional response in experimental dogs was influenced by the reward type, i.e., greatest response to food and least to another dog. Our results suggest that dogs react emotionally to problem-solving opportunities and that tail wagging may be a useful indicator of positive affective states in dogs.

[1]  D. Broom,et al.  Emotional reactions to learning in cattle , 2004 .

[2]  G. Whelan,et al.  Assessment of methods of destruction of Syphacia muris eggs , 2004, Laboratory animals.

[3]  P. McLeod Developmental changes in associations among timber wolf (Canis lupus) postures , 1996, Behavioural Processes.

[4]  M. Mendl,et al.  Proceedings of the 46th Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology , 2012 .

[5]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Why do dogs (Canis familiaris) select the empty container in an observational learning task? , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[6]  J. Langbein,et al.  Autonomic reactions indicating positive affect during acoustic reward learning in domestic pigs , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  M. Mendl,et al.  Animal behaviour: Cognitive bias and affective state , 2004, Nature.

[8]  Julie B. Schweitzer,et al.  Handler beliefs affect scent detection dog outcomes , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[9]  C. Carere,et al.  Interaction between animal personality and animal cognition , 2011 .

[10]  R. Hubrecht,et al.  Refining dog husbandry and care. Eighth report of BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. , 2004, Laboratory animals.

[11]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Rapid shaping of behaviour associated with high urinary cortisol in domestic dogs , 2010 .

[12]  J. Mench,et al.  The challenge of challenge: Can problem solving opportunities enhance animal welfare? , 2007 .

[13]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Three different coping styles in police dogs exposed to a short-term challenge , 2007, Hormones and Behavior.

[14]  J. Langbein,et al.  On the use of an automated learning device by group-housed dwarf goats: do goats seek cognitive challenges? , 2009 .

[15]  Roberto Malinow,et al.  Emotion Enhances Learning via Norepinephrine Regulation of AMPA-Receptor Trafficking , 2007, Cell.

[16]  Bonne Beerda,et al.  Chronic Stress in Dogs Subjected to Social and Spatial Restriction. II. Hormonal and Immunological Responses , 1999, Physiology & Behavior.

[17]  J. Langbein,et al.  Visual discrimination learning in dwarf goats and associated changes in heart rate and heart rate variability , 2004, Physiology & Behavior.

[18]  N. Rooney,et al.  A comparison of dog-dog and dog-human play behaviour , 2000 .

[19]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Contrafreeloading in grizzly bears: implications for captive foraging enrichment. , 2009, Zoo biology.

[20]  M. Mendl,et al.  An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Donald M. Broom,et al.  Cognitive ability and awareness in domestic animals and decisions about obligations to animals , 2010 .

[22]  T. Groothuis,et al.  Avian personalities: characterization and epigenesis , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[23]  Jaak Panksepp,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews the Basic Emotional Circuits of Mammalian Brains: Do Animals Have Affective Lives? , 2022 .

[24]  M. Mendl,et al.  Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  M. Mendl,et al.  Sensitivity to reward loss as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare , 2008, Biology Letters.

[26]  A. Mustaca,et al.  Effects of isolation in adulthood on frustration and anxiety , 2012, Behavioural Processes.

[27]  B. Puppe,et al.  Long‐term cognitive enrichment affects opioid receptor expression in the amygdala of domestic pigs , 2010, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[28]  J. Panksepp,et al.  Opioid effects on social behavior of kennel dogs , 1983 .

[29]  J. Panksepp,et al.  Opiate effects on social behavior of juvenile dogs as a function of social deprivation , 1989, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[30]  I. Duncan,et al.  ‘Pleasures’,'Pains’ and Animal Welfare: Toward a Natural History of Affect , 1998, Animal Welfare.

[31]  Can domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use referential emotional expressions to locate hidden food? , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[32]  B. Spruijt,et al.  A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[33]  Mara Mather,et al.  Beyond arousal and valence: The importance of the biological versus social relevance of emotional stimuli , 2012, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[34]  B. Forkman,et al.  Personality traits in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) , 2002 .

[35]  R. Hubrecht,et al.  Refining dog husbandry and care , 2004 .

[36]  M. Mendl,et al.  Using judgement bias to measure positive affective state in dogs , 2011 .

[37]  D. Mellor,et al.  Extending ideas about animal welfare assessment to include ‘quality of life’ and related concepts , 2011, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[38]  Martin Wolf,et al.  Prefrontal cortex activity, sympatho-vagal reaction and behaviour distinguish between situations of feed reward and frustration in dwarf goats , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[39]  Bonne Beerda,et al.  Chronic Stress in Dogs Subjected to Social and Spatial Restriction. I. Behavioral Responses , 1999, Physiology & Behavior.

[40]  M. Goddard,et al.  Individual variation in agonistic behaviour in dogs , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  Nico Bunzeck,et al.  Dopamine Modulates Episodic Memory Persistence in Old Age , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  R. Morris,et al.  Dopamine and Memory: Modulation of the Persistence of Memory for Novel Hippocampal NMDA Receptor-Dependent Paired Associates , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  C. Arnould,et al.  Emotions and cognition: a new approach to animal welfare , 2006, Animal Welfare.

[44]  D. Broom The scientific assessment of animal welfare , 1988 .

[45]  S. Paradiso,et al.  Book Review: Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions , 2000 .