Conjoint Analysis for Mobile Devices for Ubiquitous Learning in Higher Education: The Korean Case

Despite the increasing importance of mobile devices in education, the essential features of these devices for ubiquitous learning have not been empirically addressed. This study empirically investigated the necessary conditions for using mobile devices as an educational tool for ubiquitous learning in higher education by a conjoint method. The results show that respondents want to use Window-based large-screen devices for their educational purposes; thus, current tablet PCs might not be suitable in terms of screen size and type of platform. The findings also implied that potential users want to receive ubiquitous access by using advanced cellular networks, but they do not need comprehensive functions related to office documentation on their mobile devices. Therefore, this study suggests that both policy makers and business players consider developing the optimal educational mobile device as soon as possible for the successful dissemination of ubiquitous learning.

[1]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[2]  Norazah Mohd Suki,et al.  Users' Behavior towards Ubiquitous M-Learning. , 2011 .

[3]  Akihiro Nakamura,et al.  Estimating switching costs after introducing Fixed-Mobile Convergence in Japan , 2011, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[4]  Tuncay Sevindik.  Future's learning environments in health education: The effects of smart classrooms on the academic achievements of the students at health college , 2010, Telematics Informatics.

[5]  Fatih Gursul,et al.  Which one is smarter? Teacher or Board , 2010 .

[6]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  The design and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test on mobile devices , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Mohammed S. Zahrani.  The Benefits and Potential of Innovative Ubiquitous Learning Environments to Enhance Higher Education Infrastructure and Student Experiences in Saudi Arabia , 2010 .

[8]  Christopher Podmore.  Information economics and policy: In the United States edited by Michael Rubin Libraries Unlimited, Littleton, CO 1983, 340 pp , 1984 .

[9]  A. K. Aggarwal,et al.  Mobile phones as effective learner support devices: A case study , 2010, 2010 4th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education.

[10]  Quratulain Kalhoro,et al.  M-learning -an innovative advancement of ICT in education , 2010, 2010 4th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education.

[11]  Seongcheol Kim,et al.  The role of WiBro: Filling the gaps in mobile broadband technologies , 2008 .

[12]  Wang Junfeng.  Mobile learning—A new type of distance education , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Educational and Information Technology.

[13]  Nabeel A. Y. Al-Qirim,et al.  Determinants of interactive white board success in teaching in higher education institutions , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Bong-Hwa Hong,et al.  A Learning System Using User Preference in Ubiquitous Computing Environment , 2011 .

[15]  Jun Yu,et al.  Learning anywhere anytime with mobile devices , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE).

[16]  Munkee Choi,et al.  Importance of positive reputation for Smartphone adoption , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC).

[17]  Harry E. Pence,et al.  Smart Phones, a Powerful Tool in the Chemistry Classroom. , 2011 .

[18]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  College students' conceptions of context-aware ubiquitous learning: A phenomenographic analysis , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[20]  Kinshuk,et al.  An investigation of attitudes of students and teachers about participating in a context-aware ubiquitous learning activity , 2011 .

[21]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  Students' thoughts about the importance and costs of their mobile devices' features and services , 2009, Telematics Informatics.

[22]  Halil Ibrahim Haseski,et al.  The Use Of Mobile Technologies In Multimedia-Supported Learning Environments , 2011 .

[23]  T. Daim,et al.  Exploring mobile service adoption: A conjoint model , 2008, PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[24]  Mark Moran,et al.  Students' Acceptance of Tablet PCs and Implications for Educational Institutions , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[25]  Manuel Castro,et al.  New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Yen-Ting Lin,et al.  Toward interactive mobile synchronous learning environment with context-awareness service , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Effects of teaching and learning styles on students' reflection levels for ubiquitous learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[28]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Conjoint and WTP analyses of future mobile phones for digital convergence , 2010 .

[29]  Chun-Yi Wu,et al.  Application of context-aware and personalized recommendation to implement an adaptive ubiquitous learning system , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  ICT platforms and regulatory concerns in Europe , 2011 .

[31]  Jongsu Lee,et al.  An Analysis of Consumer Preferences among Wireless LAN and Mobile Internet Services , 2006 .

[32]  Gicheol Jeong,et al.  Analysis of the Competitiveness of Broadband over Power Line Communication in Korea , 2008 .

[33]  Irshad Hussain,et al.  Role of Mobile Technology in Promoting Campus-Wide Learning Environment , 2009 .

[34]  Hee Young Kim,et al.  Conjoint analysis for improving the e-book reader in the Korean market , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Conjoint analysis for IPTV service , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  Yeonbae Kim,et al.  Effects of consumer preferences on the convergence of mobile telecommunications devices , 2005 .