What Can We Learn about Neighborhood Effects from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment?1

Experimental estimates from Moving to Opportunity (MTO) show no significant impacts of moves to lower‐poverty neighborhoods on adult economic self‐sufficiency four to seven years after random assignment. The authors disagree with Clampet‐Lundquist and Massey's claim that MTO was a weak intervention and therefore uninformative about neighborhood effects. MTO produced large changes in neighborhood environments that improved adult mental health and many outcomes for young females. Clampet‐Lundquist and Massey's claim that MTO experimental estimates are plagued by selection bias is erroneous. Their new nonexperimental estimates are uninformative because they add back the selection problems that MTO's experimental design was intended to overcome.

[1]  Jeffrey R. Kling,et al.  Effects of Neighborhood Characteristics on the Mortality of Black Male Youth: Evidence from Gautreaux Effects of Neighborhood Characteristics on the Mortality of Black Male Youth: Evidence from Gautreaux , 2004 .

[2]  D. Massey,et al.  Neighborhood Effects on Economic Self‐Sufficiency: A Reconsideration of the Moving to Opportunity Experiment1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Robinson G. Hollister,et al.  How Close Is Close Enough? Evaluating Propensity Score Matching Using Data From A Class Size Reduction Experiment , 2007 .

[4]  Jens Ludwig,et al.  Is Crime Contagious? , 2006, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[5]  G. Duncan,et al.  Neighborhood resources, racial segregation, and economic mobility: Results from the Gautreaux program , 2006 .

[6]  Michael E. Sobel,et al.  What Do Randomized Studies of Housing Mobility Demonstrate? , 2006 .

[7]  D. Greenberg,et al.  Do Experimental and Nonexperimental Evaluations Give Different Answers about the Effectiveness of Government-Funded Training Programs?. , 2006 .

[8]  Jeffrey R. Kling,et al.  Neighborhood Effects on Barriers to Employment: Results from a Randomized Housing Mobility Experiment in Baltimore , 2006 .

[9]  Jeffrey R. Kling,et al.  Neighborhoods and Academic Achievement: Results from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 11909. , 2006 .

[10]  Tamás Bartus.  Estimation of Marginal Effects using Margeff , 2005 .

[11]  Greg J. Duncan,et al.  Housing mobility programs and economic self-sufficiency: Evidence from a randomized experiment , 2005 .

[12]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  Neighborhood Effects on Crime for Female and Male Youth: Evidence from a Randomized Housing Voucher Experiment , 2004 .

[13]  Erzo F. P. Luttmer.  Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being , 2004 .

[14]  Roberto Agodini,et al.  Are Experiments the Only Option? A Look at Dropout Prevention Programs , 2004, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[15]  Howard S. Bloom,et al.  Can Propensity-Score Methods Match the Findings from a Random Assignment Evaluation of Mandatory Welfare-to-Work Programs? , 2004, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[16]  Philip Oreopoulos.  The Long-Run Consequences of Living in a Poor Neighborhood , 2003 .

[17]  J. Goering,et al.  Response to Review of Choosing a Better Life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity Social Experiment , 2003, Children, Youth and Environments.

[18]  B. Jacob.  Public Housing, Housing Vouchers and Student Achievement: Evidence from Public Housing Demolitions in Chicago , 2003 .

[19]  P. Jargowsky.  Stunning Progress, Hidden Problems: The Dramatic Decline of Concentrated Poverty in the 1990s , 2003 .

[20]  Robin Jacob,et al.  Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program , 2003 .

[21]  R. Moffitt.  Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States , 2003 .

[22]  R. Sampson,et al.  ASSESSING "NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS": Social Processes and New Directions in Research , 2002 .

[23]  Bruce Sacerdote,et al.  The Social Multiplier , 2002 .

[24]  Mark D. Shroder,et al.  Successful Lease-Up in a Randomized Housing Voucher Experiment , 2001 .

[25]  J. Ludwig,et al.  Urban Poverty and Juvenile Crime: Evidence from a Randomized Housing-Mobility Experiment , 2001 .

[26]  Jeffrey A. Smith,et al.  Does Matching Overcome Lalonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators? , 2000 .

[27]  Marianne E. Page,et al.  Correlations between Neighboring Children in Their Subsequent Educational Attainment , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[28]  Leonard S. Rubinowitz,et al.  Crossing the Class and Color Lines: From Public Housing to White Suburbia , 2000 .

[29]  J. Brooks-Gunn,et al.  The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Greg J. Duncan,et al.  Neighborhood Poverty: Context and Consequences for Children, Volume I, and Neighborhood Poverty: Policy Implications in Studying Neighborhoods, Volume II , 1999 .

[31]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[32]  Winston T. Lin,et al.  The Benefits and Costs of JTPA Title II-A Programs: Key Findings from the National Job Training Partnership Act Study , 1997 .

[33]  Rebecca M. Blank,et al.  Job creation and destruction; What employers want: Job prospects for less-educated workers; and does training for the disadvantaged work? Evidence from the national JTPA study , 1997 .

[34]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Randomization as an Instrumental Variable , 1995 .

[35]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Crime and Social Interactions , 1995 .

[36]  James E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Changing the Geography of Opportunity by Expanding Residential Choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux Program , 1995 .

[37]  J. Newhouse.  Free for All?: Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment , 1993 .

[38]  W. Wilson,et al.  The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass, and Public Policy. , 1988 .

[39]  R. Lalonde.  Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data , 1984 .

[40]  Howard S. Bloom,et al.  Accounting for No-Shows in Experimental Evaluation Designs , 1984 .

[41]  D. Rubin.  Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test Comment , 1980 .

[42]  D. Basu.  Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test , 1980 .

[43]  J. Kain.  Housing Segregation, Negro Employment and Metropolitan Decentralization: Rejoinder. , 1971 .

[44]  J. Kain.  Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization , 1968 .