A study on the development of a task complexity measure for emergency operating procedures of nuclear power plants

In this study, a measure called task complexity (TACOM) that can quantify the complexity of tasks stipulated in emergency operating procedures of nuclear power plants is developed. The TACOM measure consists of five sub-measures that can cover remarkable complexity factors: (1) amount of information to be managed by operators, (2) logical entanglement due to the logical sequence of the required actions, (3) amount of actions to be accomplished by operators, (4) amount of system knowledge in recognizing the problem space, and (5) amount of cognitive resources in establishing an appropriate decision criterion. The appropriateness of the TACOM measure is investigated by comparing task performance time data with the associated TACOM scores. As a result, it is observed that there is a significant correlation between TACOM scores and task performance time data. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that the TACOM measure can be used as a meaningful tool to quantify the complexity of tasks.

[1]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Processes of task-set reconfiguration: switching operations and implementation operations. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Yves Dien.  Safety and application of procedures, or `how do `they' have to use operating procedures in nuclear power plants?' , 1998 .

[3]  Earl L. Wiener,et al.  Human factors of flight-deck checklists: The normal checklist , 1990 .

[4]  Wondea Jung,et al.  A DATABASE FOR HUMAN PERFORMANCE UNDER SIMULATED EMERGENCIES OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS , 2005 .

[5]  E. Hollnagel.  Handbook of Cognitive Task Design , 2009 .

[6]  John M. O'Hara,et al.  Computer-Based Procedure Systems: Technical Basis and Human Factors Review Guidance , 2000 .

[7]  James M. Peters,et al.  A model of distributed knowledge and action in complex systems , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  John McCarthy,et al.  Analysis of Procedure Following as Concerned Work , 2003 .

[9]  Emilie M. Roth,et al.  An empirical investigation of operator performance in cognitively demanding simulated emergencies , 1994 .

[10]  S. Keele,et al.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  M. Llory,et al.  Operator's knowledge, skill and know-how during the use of emergency procedures: design, training and cultural aspects , 1992, Conference Record for 1992 Fifth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants.

[12]  Tharam S. Dillon,et al.  Software Complexity and Its Impact on Software Reliability , 1988, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[13]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  Stress and operator decision making in coping with emergencies , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  M. Paradies,et al.  Development of the NRC`s Human Performance Investigation Process (HPIP). Volume 1, Summary , 1993 .

[15]  John Stephen Davis,et al.  A Study of the Applicability of Complexity Measures , 1988, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[16]  P. Wright,et al.  The prescription and practice of work on the flight deck , 1998 .

[17]  R. Wood.  Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[18]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Inducing compensatory information processing through decision aids that facilitate effort reduction: an experimental assessment , 2000 .

[20]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[21]  J. W. Kim,et al.  Structured information analysis for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks in nuclear power plants , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Wondea Jung,et al.  The step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures: measure verification , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[24]  J G Daugman,et al.  Information Theory and Coding , 1998 .

[25]  Wondea Jung,et al.  Identifying cognitive complexity factors affecting the complexity of procedural steps in emergency operating procedures of a nuclear power plant , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Sarah Elizabeth Zach.  Control Room Operating Procedures: Content and Format , 1980 .

[27]  G. T Klopp.  Industry program needed for nuclear accident management , 1989 .

[28]  J. K. Vaurio.  Safety-related decision making at a nuclear power plant , 1998 .

[29]  Gary Klein,et al.  Side effects of decision guidance in decision support systems , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[30]  Lisanne Bainbridge,et al.  The change in concepts needed to account for human behavior in complex dynamic tasks , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[31]  Jaewhan Kim,et al.  Comparing the complexity of procedural steps with the operators' performance observed under stressful conditions , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  Jaewhan Kim,et al.  The step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures - comparing with simulation data , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[33]  J. Wayne Spence,et al.  On human cognition and the design of information systems , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[34]  Sung Hoon Park,et al.  Review of Emergency Procedures for CANDU Reactors , 1995 .

[35]  Jaewhan Kim,et al.  Step Complexity Measure for Emergency Operating Procedures - Determining Weighting Factors , 2003 .

[36]  Steven M. Shugan.  The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[37]  Jaewhan Kim,et al.  The Step Complexity Measure - Its Meaning and Applications , 2003 .

[38]  Guy A. Boy,et al.  Toward a Categorization of Factors related to Procedure Following and Situation Awareness , 2000 .

[39]  D. R. Wieringa,et al.  Procedure Writing: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[40]  R. Westrum,et al.  Requisite Imagination: The Fine Art of Anticipating What Might Go Wrong , 2003 .

[41]  G. S. Galletti,et al.  Lessons learned from the special inspection program for emergency operating procedures. Conducted October 1988--September 1991, Supplement No. 1 , 1992 .

[42]  G. Matthews.  Human Performance: Cognition, Stress and Individual Differences , 2000 .

[43]  Neville Moray,et al.  Identifying mental models of complex human–machine systems , 1998 .

[44]  Wondea Jung,et al.  Development of the step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures using entropy concepts , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[45]  A. Mowshowitz,et al.  Entropy and the complexity of graphs. I. An index of the relative complexity of a graph. , 1968, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[46]  Bruce D'Ambrosio,et al.  Taxonomy for classifying engineering decision problems and support systems , 1995, Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf..

[47]  Nerina L. Jimmieson,et al.  The moderating role of task characteristics in determining responses to a stressful work simulation , 1999 .