Identification of Spikes by Computer

Publisher Summary This chapter provides an overview of the factors that an investigator has to consider when selecting a commercial spike identification system or when designing a customized one. It describes the features of the program Spike Finder. Spike validation is a key operation that is often neglected. The times of occurrence of the spikes are usually to be used in some analysis subsequent to the spike identification itself. It is, therefore, indispensable to have some measurement of the errors involved in spike identification, so as not to reach erroneous conclusions in subsequent analysis of the time structure of the data. The more detection and classification are automated, or use complex features, the more this precaution is important to minimize errors. Spike analysis can be divided into two tasks: (1) detection and (2) classification. The task of spike detection is essentially that of separating spikes from noise, that is, from unwanted signals of any type. It is often based on the use of some sort of voltage threshold, a software equivalent of the window discriminators that for many years were the primary means of selecting specific spikes. If a threshold is the basis of spike detection, it follows that the larger the signal-to-noise ratio, the more reliable the ensuing spike detection will be. Even the best computer method will fail if the signals of interest are barely detectable.

[1]  William E. Faller,et al.  Recording of simultaneous single-unit activity in the dragonfly ganglia , 1991, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  G. D. Mccann,et al.  Interactive computer strategies for living nervous system research. , 1973, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[3]  Frédéric Marion-Poll,et al.  Software filter for detecting spikes superimposed on a fluctuating baseline , 1991, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Daniel K. Hartline,et al.  Separation of multi-unit nerve impulse trains by a multi-channel linear filter algorithm , 1975, Brain Research.

[5]  M. Salganicoff,et al.  Unsupervised waveform classification for multi-neuron recordings: a real-time, software-based system. I. Algorithms and implementation , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  J. Vibert,et al.  Spike separation in multiunit records: a multivariate analysis of spike descriptive parameters. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  V J Prochazka,et al.  On-line multi-unit sorting with resolution of superposition potentials. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Bruce C. Wheeler,et al.  A Comparison of Techniques for Classification of Multiple Neural Signals , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  W. Calvin Some simple spike separation techniques for simultaneously recorded neurons. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Gregory J. Dinning,et al.  Real-Time Classification of Multiunit Neural Signals Using Reduced Feature Sets , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  E. M. Schmidt,et al.  Computer dissection of peripheral nerve bundle activity. , 1969, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[12]  M. F. Sarna,et al.  Unsupervised waveform classification for multi-neuron recordings: a real-time, software-based system. II. Performance comparison to other sorters , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Daniel S. Ruchkin,et al.  Principles of Neurobiological Signal Analysis , 1976 .

[14]  Fred Delcomyn,et al.  A slope-based approach to spike discrimination in digitized data , 1990, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  Bruce C. Wheeler,et al.  Current Source Density Estimation Using Microelectrode Array Data from the Hippocampal Slice Preparation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  K I Naka,et al.  An attempt to analyze multi-unit recordings. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  D J Mishelevich,et al.  On-line real-time digital computer separation of extracellular neuroelectric signals. , 1970, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[18]  E W Kent,et al.  An educable wave form recognition program suitable for on-line discrimination of extracellular single units. , 1971, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  H. Pinsker,et al.  Computer separation of unitary spikes from whole-nerve recordings , 1979, Brain Research.

[20]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  Neural network PC tools , 1990 .

[21]  W SIMON,et al.  THE REAL-TIME SORTING OF NEURO-ELECTRIC ACTION POTENTIALS IN MULTIPLE UNIT STUDIES. , 1965, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  R. L. Schoenfeld,et al.  Minicomputer identification and timing of nerve impulses mixed in a single recording channel , 1973 .

[23]  W. J. Heetderks,et al.  Criteria for evaluating multiunit spike separation techniques , 1978, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  M. Abeles,et al.  Multispike train analysis , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  Edward M. Schmidt,et al.  Computer separation of multi-unit neuroelectric data: a review , 1984, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[26]  M. J. Katz,et al.  Fractals and the analysis of waveforms. , 1988, Computers in biology and medicine.