Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning

BackgroundResearch has shown that active learning promotes student learning and increases retention rates of STEM undergraduates. Yet, instructors are reluctant to change their teaching approaches for several reasons, including a fear of student resistance to active learning. This paper addresses this issue by building on our prior work which demonstrates that certain instructor strategies can positively influence student responses to active learning. We present an analysis of interview data from 17 engineering professors across the USA about the ways they use strategies to reduce student resistance to active learning in their undergraduate engineering courses.ResultsOur data reveal that instructor strategies for reducing student resistance generally fall within two broad types: explanation and facilitation strategies. Explanation strategies consist of the following: (a) explain the purpose, (b) explain course expectations, and (c) explain activity expectations. Facilitation strategies include the following: (a) approach non-participants, (b) assume an encouraging demeanor, (c) grade on participation, (d) walk around the room, (e) invite questions, (f) develop a routine, (g) design activities for participation, and (h) use incremental steps. Four of the strategies emerged from our analysis and were previously unstudied in the context of student resistance.ConclusionsThe findings of this study have practical implications for instructors wishing to implement active learning. There is a variety of strategies to reduce student resistance to active learning, and there are multiple successful ways to implement the strategies. Importantly, effective use of strategies requires some degree of intentional course planning. These strategies should be considered as a starting point for instructors seeking to better incorporate the use of active learning strategies into their undergraduate engineering classrooms.

[1]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  Experiences of new faculty implementing research-based instructional strategies , 2012 .

[2]  P. Rangachari,et al.  Design of a problem-based undergraduate course in pharmacology: implications for the teaching of physiology. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  Shane Brown,et al.  The Adoption of a Capstone Assessment Instrument , 2012 .

[4]  Prateek Shekhar,et al.  The Variation of Nontraditional Teaching Methods Across 17 Undergraduate Engineering Classrooms , 2017 .

[5]  J. Winquist,et al.  Evaluating an Active Learning Approach to Teaching Introductory Statistics: A Classroom Workbook Approach , 2011 .

[6]  Johannes Strobel,et al.  When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms , 2009 .

[7]  Pedro Arce,et al.  The colloquial approach: An active learning technique , 1994 .

[8]  David Lake,et al.  Student performance and perceptions of a lecture-based course compared with the same course utilizing group discussion. , 2001, Physical therapy.

[9]  M. Veldhuis,et al.  Teachers’ use of classroom assessment techniques in primary mathematics education—an explorative study with six Chinese teachers , 2016 .

[10]  Travis J. Lund,et al.  The importance of context: an exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty , 2015, International Journal of STEM Education.

[11]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Core Chemical Engineering Courses. , 2013 .

[12]  Leonard Goodwin,et al.  Teaching freshmen to think—does active learning work? , 1991 .

[13]  Susan R. Singer,et al.  Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2012 .

[14]  D Richardson,et al.  Teaching physiology by combined passive (pedagogical) and active (andragogical) methods. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  Susan E. Shadle,et al.  Faculty drivers and barriers: laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments , 2017, International Journal of STEM Education.

[16]  Kim A. Stewart,et al.  Lessons from the Best and Worst Student Team Experiences: How a Teacher can make the Difference , 1999 .

[17]  K. Anthis,et al.  Scaffolding , 2012 .

[18]  R. Felder,et al.  Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction , 1996 .

[19]  Ian A. Waitz,et al.  Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[20]  Matthew T. Hora,et al.  Findings from classroom observations of 58 math and science faculty , 2012 .

[21]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  Impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics in the United States , 2009 .

[22]  Richard M. Felder.  How About a Quick One , 1992 .

[23]  Jason Wilson,et al.  A Comprehensive Probability Project for the Upper Division One-Semester Probability Course Using Yahtzee , 2011 .

[24]  J. P. Mohsen,et al.  Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education , 2009 .

[25]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Are Student Ratings of Instruction Useful? , 2005 .

[26]  Katherine A. Friedrich,et al.  9: Thawing the Chilly Climate: Inclusive Teaching Resources for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math , 2008 .

[27]  Rebecca Brent,et al.  ACTIVE LEARNING: AN INTRODUCTION * , 2009 .

[28]  R. R. Wilke,et al.  The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a human physiology course for nonmajors. , 2003, Advances in physiology education.

[29]  R. Felder,et al.  The National Effective Teaching Institute: Assessment of Impact and Implications for Faculty Development , 2010 .

[30]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Joel A. Michael,et al.  Faculty Perceptions About Barriers to Active Learning , 2007 .

[32]  Katharine Semsar,et al.  How Not to Lose Your Students with Concept Maps. , 2011 .

[33]  Prateek Shekhar,et al.  Creating an Instrument to Measure Student Response to Instructional Practices , 2017 .

[34]  Prateek Shekhar,et al.  Students’ expectations, types of instruction, and instructor strategies predicting student response to active learning , 2017 .

[35]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning , 2007 .

[36]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  Best Practices Involving Teamwork in the Classroom: Results From a Survey of 6435 Engineering Student Respondents , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[37]  So Yoon Yoon,et al.  The landscape of PreK-12 engineering online resources for teachers: global trends , 2015 .

[38]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[39]  Scott Swigart,et al.  Student perceptions of a Top 200 Medication Course utilizing active learning techniques , 2013 .

[40]  Peter Armbruster,et al.  Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[41]  Jeffrey E. Froyd,et al.  Estimates of Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Core Electrical or Computer Engineering Courses , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[42]  E A Hoffman.  Successful application of active learning techniques to introductory microbiology. , 2001, Microbiology education.

[43]  Kristin A. Duncan.  Grade Inflation: A Crisis in College Education , 2004 .

[44]  M. Chi,et al.  The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes , 2014 .

[45]  G. Webbe,et al.  Any Questions , 1946, The Indian medical gazette.

[46]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[47]  Indra K. Reddy,et al.  Implementation of a Pharmaceutics Course in a Large Class through Active Learning Using Quick-Thinks and Case-Based , 2000 .

[48]  D. McConnell,et al.  Challenging instructors to change: a mixed methods investigation on the effects of material development on the pedagogical beliefs of geoscience instructors , 2016, International Journal of STEM Education.

[49]  J. Michael.  Where's the evidence that active learning works? , 2006, Advances in physiology education.

[50]  Prateek Shekhar,et al.  Development of an observation protocol to study undergraduate engineering student resistance to active learning , 2015 .

[51]  Jan Keith Farmer,et al.  Where ' s the evidence that active learning works ? , 2006 .

[52]  P. Kvam.  The Effect of Active Learning Methods on Student Retention in Engineering Statistics , 2000 .

[53]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[54]  Aman Yadav,et al.  Problem Based Learning In An Undergraduate Electrical Engineering Course , 2010 .

[55]  Rebecca Brent,et al.  An Analysis Of Fifteen Years Of The National Effective Teaching Institute , 2009 .

[56]  Susan K. Donohue,et al.  Factors affecting student attitudes toward active learning activities in a graduate engineering statistics course , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[57]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Bridging the Research‐to‐Practice Gap: Designing an Institutional Change Plan Using Local Evidence , 2014 .