Mechanical supports for acute, severe ankle sprain: a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND Severe ankle sprains are a common presentation in emergency departments in the UK. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of three different mechanical supports (Aircast brace, Bledsoe boot, or 10-day below-knee cast) compared with that of a double-layer tubular compression bandage in promoting recovery after severe ankle sprains. METHODS We did a pragmatic, multicentre randomised trial with blinded assessment of outcome. 584 participants with severe ankle sprain were recruited between April, 2003, and July, 2005, from eight emergency departments across the UK. Participants were provided with a mechanical support within the first 3 days of attendance by a trained health-care professional, and given advice on reducing swelling and pain. Functional outcomes were measured over 9 months. The primary outcome was quality of ankle function at 3 months, measured using the Foot and Ankle Score; analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN37807450. RESULTS Patients who received the below-knee cast had a more rapid recovery than those given the tubular compression bandage. We noted clinically important benefits at 3 months in quality of ankle function with the cast compared with tubular compression bandage (mean difference 9%; 95% CI 2.4-15.0), as well as in pain, symptoms, and activity. The mean difference in quality of ankle function between Aircast brace and tubular compression bandage was 8%; 95% CI 1.8-14.2, but there were little differences for pain, symptoms, and activity. Bledsoe boots offered no benefit over tubular compression bandage, which was the least effective treatment throughout the recovery period. There were no significant differences between tubular compression bandage and the other treatments at 9 months. Side-effects were rare with no discernible differences between treatments. Reported events (all treatments combined) were cellulitis (two cases), pulmonary embolus (two cases), and deep-vein thrombosis (three cases). INTERPRETATION A short period of immobilisation in a below-knee cast or Aircast results in faster recovery than if the patient is only given tubular compression bandage. We recommend below-knee casts because they show the widest range of benefit. FUNDING National Co-ordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment.

[1]  L. Blankevoort,et al.  Functional treatments for acute ruptures of the lateral ankle ligament , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[2]  P. Kujath,et al.  Low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of thromboembolism in outpatients immobilized by plaster cast. , 1993, Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis.

[3]  J R Morris,et al.  The Sickness Impact Profile: Conceptual Formulation and Methodology for the Development of a Health Status Measure , 1976, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[4]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[5]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[6]  E. Hendriks,et al.  Effectiveness of exercise therapy and manual mobilisation in ankle sprain and functional instability: a systematic review. , 2006, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[7]  H. Handoll,et al.  Surgical versus conservative treatment for acute injuries of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle in adults. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[8]  S. Lamb,et al.  Treatment of severe ankle sprain: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three types of mechanical ankle support with tubular bandage. The CAST trial. , 2009, Health technology assessment.

[9]  R. Marti,et al.  Treatment of Ruptures of the Lateral Ankle Ligaments: A Meta-Analysis* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  B. Beynnon,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Investigation of the Treatment of First-Time Ankle Sprains , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  M. Cooke,et al.  A survey of current consultant practice of treatment of severe ankle sprains in emergency departments in the United Kingdom , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.

[12]  Jakub Szajman,et al.  Fibre optic shock velocity sensor for solids , 1999 .

[13]  M. Järvinen,et al.  Basic science and clinical studies coincide: active treatment approach is needed after a sports injury , 2003, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[14]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[15]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[16]  K. Koval,et al.  Functional outcome of surgery for fractures of the ankle. A prospective, randomised comparison of management in a cast or a functional brace. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  B. Koes,et al.  What is the clinical course of acute ankle sprains? A systematic literature review. , 2008, The American journal of medicine.

[18]  J. Nicholl,et al.  Pilot study of the epidemiology of sports injuries and exercise-related morbidity. , 1991, British journal of sports medicine.

[19]  S. Lamb,et al.  Clinical and cost effectiveness of mechanical support for severe ankle sprains: design of a randomised controlled trial in the emergency department [ISRCTN 37807450] , 2005, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[20]  Glenn N. Williams,et al.  Persistent Disability Associated with Ankle Sprains: A Prospective Examination of an Athletic Population , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[21]  David Machin,et al.  Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies , 1997 .

[22]  W. Assendelft,et al.  Immobilisation and functional treatment for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[23]  P. Renström,et al.  Ankle ligament injuries. , 1997, British journal of sports medicine.

[24]  P. Kind,et al.  Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1998, British journal of rheumatology.

[25]  D. Stryer,et al.  Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. , 2003, JAMA.

[26]  Jon Karlsson,et al.  Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for Ankle Ligament Reconstruction , 2001, Foot & ankle international.

[27]  E. Roos,et al.  The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[28]  Roger A. Sugden,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys , 1988 .

[29]  R. Verhagen,et al.  Long-term follow-up of inversion trauma of the ankle , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.