An Ω(n) Lower Bound for Bilinear Group Based Private Information Retrieval

A two server private information retrieval (PIR) scheme allows a user U to retrieve thei-th bit of ann-bit string x replicated between two servers while each server individually learns no info rmation abouti. The main parameter of interest in a PIR scheme is its communication complexity, name ly the number of bits exchanged by the user and the servers. A large amount of effort has been invested b y r searchers over the last decade in search for efficient PIR schemes. A number of different schemes [6, 4, 19] have been proposed, however all of them ended up with the same communication complexity of O(n1/3). The best known lower bound to date is 5 log n by [17]. The tremendous gap between upper and lower bounds is the focus of our paper. We show an Ω(n1/3) lower bound in a restricted model that nevertheless captures all known upper bound techniques. Our lower bound applies to bilinear group based PIR schemes. A bilinear P IR scheme is a one round PIR scheme, where user computes the dot product of servers’ respon ses to obtain the desired value of the i-th bit. Every linear scheme can be turned into a bilinear one. A group based PIR scheme, is a PIR scheme, that involves servers representing database by a function on a certain finite group G, and allows user to retrieve the value of this function at any group element using the natural secret sharing sche me based onG. Our proof relies on some basic notions of representation theory of finite groups. We also discuss th e approaches one may take to obtain a general lower bound for bilinear PIR.

[1]  Joan Feigenbaum,et al.  Hiding Instances in Multioracle Queries , 1990, STACS.

[2]  Eyal Kushilevitz,et al.  Private information retrieval , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE 36th Annual Foundations of Computer Science.

[3]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  On Lower Bounds for the Communication Complexity of Private Information Retrieval ∗ , 2000 .

[4]  Elizabeth D Mann Private access to distributed information , 1998 .

[5]  Toshiya Itoh,et al.  Efficient Private Information Retrieval , 1999 .

[6]  Yuval Ishai,et al.  Improved upper bounds on information-theoretic private information retrieval , 1999, STOC 1999.

[7]  Jonathan Katz,et al.  On the efficiency of local decoding procedures for error-correcting codes , 2000, STOC '00.

[8]  T. Itoh On Lower Bounds for the Communication Complexity of Private Information Retrieval ∗ , 2000 .

[9]  Yuval Ishai,et al.  Information-Theoretic Private Information Retrieval: A Unied Construction (Extended Abstract) , 2001 .

[10]  Yuval Ishai,et al.  Breaking the Barrier for Information-Theoretic Private Information Retrieval , 2002 .

[11]  S. Weintraub Representation Theory of Finite Groups: Algebra and Arithmetic , 2003 .

[12]  Lance Fortnow,et al.  A Nearly Tight Lower Bound for Private Information Retrieval Protocols , 2003 .

[13]  Ronald de Wolf,et al.  Improved Lower Bounds for Locally Decodable Codes and Private Information Retrieval , 2004, ICALP.

[14]  Sergey Yekhanin,et al.  Private information retrieval , 2010, CACM.