Power control in cognitive radio networks: how to cross a multi-lane highway

We consider power control in cognitive radio networks where secondary users identify and exploit instantaneous and local spectrum opportunities without causing unacceptable interference to primary users. We qualitatively characterize the impacts of the transmission power of secondary users on the occurrence of spectrum opportunities and the reliability of opportunity detection. Based on a Poisson model of the primary network, we quantify these impacts by showing that (i) the probability of spectrum opportunity decreases exponentially with the transmission power of secondary users, where the exponential decay constant is given by the traffic load of primary users; (ii) reliable opportunity detection is achieved in the two extreme regimes in terms of the ratio between the transmission power of secondary users and that of primary users. Such analytical characterizations allow us to study power control for optimal transport throughput under constraints on the interference to primary users. Furthermore, we reveal the difference between detecting primary signals and detecting spectrum opportunities, and demonstrate the complex relationship between physical layer spectrum sensing and MAC layer throughput. The dependency of this PHY-MAC interaction on the application type and the use of handshake signaling such as RTS/CTS is also illustrated.

[1]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Soft Sensing and Optimal Power Control for Cognitive Radio , 2010, IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[2]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  A Survey of Dynamic Spectrum Access , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[3]  Wei Ren,et al.  Connectivity of cognitive radio networks: proximity vs. opportunity , 2009, CoRoNet '09.

[4]  Vaduvur Bharghavan,et al.  Transmission power control for multiple access wireless packet networks , 2000, Proceedings 25th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks. LCN 2000.

[5]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[6]  Dimitrios D. Vergados,et al.  A survey on power control issues in wireless sensor networks , 2007, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  Artemas Martin To Find the Area Common to Two Intersecting Circles , 1874 .

[8]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Bandwidth partitioning in decentralized wireless networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Shuguang Cui,et al.  Power and Rate Control with Dynamic Programming for Cognitive Radios , 2007, IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[10]  Daniele Puccinelli,et al.  Routing in ad hoc networks: a case for long hops , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Sung-Ju Lee,et al.  Transmission power control in wireless ad hoc networks: challenges, solutions and open issues , 2004, IEEE Network.

[12]  Yan Chen,et al.  On cognitive radio networks with opportunistic power control strategies in fading channels , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[14]  M. R. Leadbetter Poisson Processes , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[15]  Ying-Chang Liang,et al.  Joint power control and beamforming for cognitive radio networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[16]  Lijun Qian,et al.  Power Control for Cognitive Radio Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, 2007 15th IEEE Workshop on Local & Metropolitan Area Networks.

[17]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Joint Design and Separation Principle for Opportunistic Spectrum Access in the Presence of Sensing Errors , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.