Sliding channel cladding connections for precast structures subjected to earthquake action

The traditional seismic design of precast frame buildings concerns the calculation of the frame, considering the cladding panels as non-structural added masses without stiffness, assuming they are connected so to not interact with the frame. Under seismic excitation, the cladding connections are subjected to complex multi-directional actions, depending on the panel static scheme, all of which involve relative motion between cladding and structure. The correct kinematics of these connections in decoupling the panels from the structure has rarely been demonstrated, and accidental coupling may result in dangerous sudden increase of forces and subsequent failure of the connections. This is also confirmed by post-earthquake field observations on precast structures, which are characterised by pronounced deformation under seismic loading due to their flexibility. An innovative panel-to-structure sliding connection conceived to allow for an effective cladding-structure decoupling has been tested to check its correct kinematics within a uniaxial test apparatus, imposing displacement histories with application of constant normal force. The experimental results of cyclic tests with a tailored test protocol are presented, and static and dynamic friction coefficients are experimentally evaluated. A cyclic test on a full-scale precast prototype equipped with sliding panel connections has been carried out, checking the global behaviour of such systems and their installation peculiarities. Design rules for the evaluation of seismic actions arising within the proposed panel arrangements are finally provided, accounting for the experimentally evaluated friction coefficients.

[1]  Liberato Ferrara,et al.  Friction dissipative devices for cladding panels in precast buildings , 2011 .

[2]  Giandomenico Toniolo,et al.  Precast concrete structures: the lessons learned from the L'Aquila earthquake , 2012 .

[3]  Gennaro Magliulo,et al.  Influence of cladding panels on the first period of one-story precast buildings , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[4]  Mahendra P. Singh,et al.  Seismic Design Forces. I: Rigid Nonstructural Components , 2006 .

[5]  Lesley Sneed,et al.  Interface Shear Transfer of Lightweight-Aggregate Concretes with Different Lightweight Aggregates , 2016 .

[6]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Seismic response of precast structures with vertical cladding panels: The SAFECLADDING experimental campaign , 2017 .

[7]  Ned M. Cleland,et al.  Performance of Precast Concrete Building Structures , 2012 .

[8]  Giandomenico Toniolo,et al.  Conceptual design and full‐scale experimentation of cladding panel connection systems of precast buildings , 2017 .

[9]  Negro Paolo,et al.  The influence of claddings on the seismic response of precast structures: the SAFECLADDING project , 2014 .

[10]  Richard Henry,et al.  Panel connection details in existing New Zealand precast concrete buildings , 2016 .

[11]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Seismic design and performance of dry-assembled precast structures with adaptable joints , 2018 .

[12]  Fabio Biondini,et al.  Role of wall panel connections on the seismic performance of precast structures , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[13]  Chiara Passoni,et al.  Evaluation of out‐of‐plane seismic performance of column‐to‐column precast concrete cladding panels in one‐storey industrial buildings , 2018 .

[14]  Lorenzo De Stefani,et al.  Passive control of precast building response using cladding panels as dissipative shear walls , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[15]  Fabio Biondini,et al.  Experimental investigation on the influence of silicone sealant on the seismic behaviour of precast façades , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[16]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Performance of industrial buildings during the Emilia earthquakes in Northern Italy and recommendations for their strengthening , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[17]  Roberto Villaverde,et al.  Seismic Design of Secondary Structures: State of the Art , 1997 .

[18]  Gennaro Magliulo,et al.  The Emilia Earthquake: Seismic Performance of Precast Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 2014 .

[19]  Andrea Belleri,et al.  Horizontal cladding panels: in-plane seismic performance in precast concrete buildings , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[20]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Façade damage assessment of concrete buildings in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake , 2012 .

[21]  Fabio Biondini,et al.  Friction-based dissipative devices for precast concrete panels , 2017 .

[22]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Seismic fragility of Italian RC precast industrial structures , 2015 .

[23]  C. Nuti,et al.  Speedup of post earthquake community recovery: the case of precast industrial buildings after the Emilia 2012 earthquake , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[24]  Davide Bellotti,et al.  Experimental investigation of the cyclic response of reinforced precast concrete framed structures , 2015 .

[25]  Edwin R. Schmeckpeper,et al.  Evolution of Design Code Requirements for Exterior Elements and Connections , 2005 .

[26]  Andrea Belleri,et al.  Seismic Performance of Precast Industrial Facilities Following Major Earthquakes in the Italian Territory , 2015 .

[27]  Tatjana Isaković,et al.  Seismic response of short restrainers used to protect cladding panels in RC precast buildings , 2018 .

[28]  Giovanni Plizzari,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies on the behaviour of concrete sandwich panels , 2011 .

[29]  Marco Savoia,et al.  Damage and collapses in industrial precast buildings after the 2012 Emilia earthquake , 2017 .

[30]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  Seismic fragility functions of industrial precast building classes , 2016 .

[31]  Robert M. Henry,et al.  Cladding‐Frame Interaction , 1986 .

[32]  Tatjana Isaković,et al.  Cyclic response of hammer-head strap cladding-to-structure connections used in RC precast building , 2016 .

[33]  Giandomenico Toniolo,et al.  Influence of different mechanical column-foundation connection devices on the seismic behaviour of precast structures , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[34]  Fabio Biondini,et al.  Experimental Investigation on Steel W-Shaped Folded Plate Dissipative Connectors for Horizontal Precast Concrete Cladding Panels , 2018 .

[35]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Pseudodynamic Tests on a Full-Scale 3-Storey Precast Concrete Building: Global Response , 2013 .

[36]  Fabio Biondini,et al.  Seismic performance of precast concrete structures with energy dissipating cladding panel connection systems , 2018, Structural Concrete.

[37]  Eleni Smyrou,et al.  Behaviour of steel cushions subjected to combined actions , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[38]  Jean-Paul Pinelli,et al.  Passive Control of Building Response Using Energy Dissipating Cladding Connections , 1993 .

[39]  Fabio Minghini,et al.  Empirical seismic fragility for the precast RC industrial buildings damaged by the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquakes , 2017 .

[40]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[41]  Elide Nastri,et al.  Performance evaluation of a seismic retrofitted R.C. precast industrial building , 2017 .

[42]  Fabio Minghini,et al.  Observational failure analysis of precast buildings after the 2012 Emilia earthquakes , 2016 .

[43]  Ioannis N. Psycharis,et al.  Experimental investigation of the response of precast concrete cladding panels with integrated connections under monotonic and cyclic loading , 2018 .

[44]  Fabio Biondini,et al.  Experimental tests on multiple-slit devices for precast concrete panels , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[45]  Keiichiro Suita,et al.  Interaction between cladding and structural frame observed in a full‐scale steel building test , 2007 .