Genetic Susceptibility and Survival: Application to Breast Cancer

Abstract Inherited mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are known to confer an elevated risk of both breast and ovarian cancers. The effect of carrying such a mutation on survival after developing breast or ovarian cancer is less well understood. We investigate the relationship between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carrier status and survival after breast cancer. We obtained data from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, a large population-based study including more than 4,000 breast cancer cases. Patient data include extensive information about breast and ovarian cancer in relatives. We obtained follow-up information about patients via record linkage with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry, with maximum follow-up of 15 years. In the absence of genetic testing for each individual, presence or absence of mutation at a breast cancer susceptibility gene is captured by a pair of binary latent variables whose marginal probability depends on the patient's family history of breast and ovarian cancer. We estimate the effect of genotype on survival using a Cox proportional hazards model, treating genetic status as a latent variable and controlling for stage at diagnosis, histology, whether radiation treatment was administered, the individual's smoking history, body mass, race, and age at diagnosis. Inference is accomplished using a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to draw a sample from the posterior distribution of model parameters accounting for sampling error, uncertainty in the genotype of study participants, and uncertainty in estimates of genetic parameters. An analysis that does not discriminate between BRCA1 and BRCA2 estimates the genetic effect on survival after breast cancer for women carrying a mutation at either site. We find evidence that survival of nonirradiated mutation carriers is better than that of noncarriers; we estimate the probability of improved survival to be .990. As a byproduct of this analysis, we estimate that a study based on 901 women with known mutation status would yield estimates of genetic effect on survival with comparable uncertainty to that obtained in the combined-gene analysis. An analysis assessing the separate effects of the two genes indicates that carriers of either mutation may have an improved prognosis. We estimate the probability of improved survival among nonirradiated BRCA1 carriers to be .844, and that among nonirradiated BRCA2 carriers to be .924. However, substantial uncertainty remains about the magnitude of the BRCA2 effect.

[1]  P. Hartge,et al.  Survival after breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  D. Berry,et al.  Validating Bayesian Prediction Models: a Case Study in Genetic Susceptibility to Breast Cancer , 1999 .

[3]  J Chang-Claude,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  J. Ranstam,et al.  Survival of BRCA1 breast and ovarian cancer patients: a population-based study from southern Sweden. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  H. Lynch,et al.  Prognosis of BRCA1 hereditary breast cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[6]  Hongzhe Li,et al.  Semiparametric estimation of major gene effects for age of onset , 1998 .

[7]  E. Wijsman,et al.  Semiparametric estimation of major gene effects for age of onset. , 1998, Genetic epidemiology.

[8]  D. Berry,et al.  Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  Kenneth Lange,et al.  Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Genetic Analysis , 1997 .

[10]  F. Couch,et al.  BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Hartge,et al.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  M. King,et al.  Population genetics of BRCA1 and BRCA2. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  G. Eichele,et al.  Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by Rad51 in mice lacking Brca2 , 1997, Nature.

[14]  H Li,et al.  Semiparametric estimation of major gene and family-specific random effects for age of onset. , 1997, Biometrics.

[15]  D. Berry,et al.  Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  M. King,et al.  Genetic epidemiology of breast and ovarian cancers. , 1997, Epidemiologic reviews.

[17]  M. Morgan,et al.  Clinical and pathological features of ovarian cancer in women with germ-line mutations of BRCA1. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Alfred A. Boyd,et al.  Ashkenazi Jewish population frequencies for common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Kenneth Offit,et al.  The carrier frequency of the BRCA2 6174delT mutation among Ashkenazi Jewish individuals is approximately 1% , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[20]  J. Cox,et al.  Breast cancer: Is ethnicity an independent prognostic factor for survival? , 1996, Cancer.

[21]  W. Thompson,et al.  The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer , 1996, Cancer.

[22]  G M Lenoir,et al.  Hereditary breast cancer: Pathobiology, prognosis, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene linkage , 1996, Cancer.

[23]  Julian Peto,et al.  Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 , 1996, Nature.

[24]  Peter Green,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1996 .

[25]  D. Bentley,et al.  Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 , 1995, Nature.

[26]  Walter R. Gilks,et al.  Strategies for improving MCMC , 1995 .

[27]  Walter R. Gilks,et al.  Gibbs sampling methods in genetics , 1995 .

[28]  D. F. Easton,et al.  The genetics of breast and ovarian cancer. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  L. Tierney Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions , 1994 .

[30]  A. Miller,et al.  Pre‐morbid body size and the prognosis of women with breast cancer , 1994, International journal of cancer.

[31]  M. Skolnick,et al.  BRCA1 mutations in primary breast and ovarian carcinomas. , 1994, Science.

[32]  Steven E. Bayer,et al.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. , 1994, Science.

[33]  U. Chetty,et al.  Breast cancer incidence, penetrance and survival in probable carriers of BRCA1 gene mutation in families linked to BRCA1 on chromosome 17q12–21 , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[34]  N Risch,et al.  Autosomal dominant inheritance of early‐onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction , 1994, Cancer.

[35]  N. Risch,et al.  Autosomal dominant inheritance of early‐onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction , 1994 .

[36]  D. Thomas,et al.  Censored survival models for genetic epidemiology: A gibbs sampling approach , 1994, Genetic epidemiology.

[37]  M. Slattery,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of family history and breast cancer risk. The Utah Population Database. , 1993, JAMA.

[38]  M. Swift Breast cancer incidence. , 1993, Science.

[39]  C. Steel,et al.  Breast cancer survival in BRCA1 carriers , 1993, The Lancet.

[40]  F. Kee,et al.  Families at risk of colorectal cancer: who are they? , 1992, Gut.

[41]  D G Clayton,et al.  A Monte Carlo method for Bayesian inference in frailty models. , 1991, Biometrics.

[42]  F. Kee,et al.  Prognosis in familial non-polyposis colorectal cancer. , 1991, Gut.

[43]  N Risch,et al.  Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[44]  H T Lynch,et al.  Hereditary breast cancer. , 1991, Annals of medicine.

[45]  M. Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[46]  Jonas Mockus,et al.  The Application Of Bayesian Methods , 1989 .

[47]  W. Thompson,et al.  Familial ovarian cancer: a population-based case-control study. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[48]  P. Wingo,et al.  The reduction in risk of ovarian cancer associated with oral-contraceptive use. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[49]  S C Hunt,et al.  A comparison of positive family history definitions for defining risk of future disease. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[50]  L. Kuller,et al.  Family history of cancer related to cholesterol level in young adults , 1986, Genetic epidemiology.

[51]  Philip Heidelberger,et al.  Simulation Run Length Control in the Presence of an Initial Transient , 1983, Oper. Res..

[52]  R. Prentice Covariate measurement errors and parameter estimation in a failure time regression model , 1982 .

[53]  J. Kalbfleisch Non‐Parametric Bayesian Analysis of Survival Time Data , 1978 .

[54]  E. Murphy,et al.  Principles of genetic counseling , 1975 .

[55]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[56]  E. Murphy,et al.  The Application of Bayesian Methods in Genetic Counselling , 1969 .

[57]  R. F. Kaiser,et al.  Activities of the Field Investigations and Demonstrations Branch. , 1957, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[58]  T. Chin,et al.  Clinical and pathological features. , 1957, Public health reports.

[59]  J. Thoday Population Genetics , 1956, Nature.

[60]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .