Decision Fusion for Structural Damage Detection: Numerical and Experimental Studies

This paper describes a decision fusion strategy that can integrate multiple individual damage detection measures to form a new measure, and the new measure has higher probability of correct detection than any individual measure. The method to compute the probability of correct selection is presented to measure the system performance of the fusion system that includes the presented fusion strategy. And parametric sensitive studies on system performance are also conducted. The superiority of the fusion strategy herein is that it can be extended to deal with the multiresolution subdecision or blind adaptive detection, and corresponding methodologies are also provided. Finally, an experimental setup was fabricated, whereby the vibration properties of damaged and undamaged structures were measured. The experimental results with the undamaged structural model provide information for producing an improved theoretical and numerical model via model updating techniques. Three existing vibration-based damage detection methods with varied resolutions were utilized to identify the damage that occurred in the structure, based on the experimental results. Then the decision fusion strategy was implemented to join the subdecisions from these three methods. The fused results are shown to be superior to those from single method.

[1]  Bin Liu,et al.  Blind Adaptive Algorithm for M-Ary Distributed Detection , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[2]  M. Wolff,et al.  Statistical Classifiers for Structural Health Monitoring , 2009, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[3]  Homayoun Seraji,et al.  A Multisensor Decision Fusion System for Terrain Safety Assessment , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[4]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation and Decision Fusion: A Survey , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Intelligent Systems.

[5]  R. B. Testa,et al.  Modal Analysis for Damage Detection in Structures , 1991 .

[6]  Nirwan Ansari,et al.  Adaptive decision fusion for unequiprobable sources , 1997 .

[7]  J. Ghosh,et al.  An Introduction to Bayesian Analysis: Theory and Methods , 2006 .

[8]  Hui Li,et al.  Structural damage identification based on integration of information fusion and shannon entropy , 2008 .

[9]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  Structural Damage Assessment Based on Wavelet Packet Transform , 2002 .

[10]  Kerim Demirbas Maximum a posteriori approach to object recognition with distributed sensors , 1988 .

[11]  Mohsen A. Issa,et al.  Behavior of masonry-infilled nonductile reinforced concrete frames , 2002 .

[12]  Ling Zhang,et al.  A weighted balance evidence theory for structural multiple damage localization , 2006 .

[13]  Xin Yang,et al.  Image quality assessment by decision fusion , 2008, IEICE Electron. Express.

[14]  K. Mathioudakis,et al.  Gas Turbine Fault Diagnosis Using Fuzzy-Based Decision Fusion , 2009 .

[15]  P.K. Varshney,et al.  Optimal Data Fusion in Multiple Sensor Detection Systems , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[16]  Xiaoming Wang,et al.  Multilevel Decision Fusion in a Distributed Active Sensor Network for Structural Damage Detection , 2006 .

[17]  Robert R. Tenney,et al.  Detection with distributed sensors , 1980 .

[18]  Sun Bing-nan Maximum joint probability fusion rule for multi-resolution decision of structure damage detection , 2007 .

[19]  W. Baek,et al.  Optimal m-ary data fusion with distributed sensors , 1995 .

[20]  Grant P. Steven,et al.  VIBRATION-BASED MODEL-DEPENDENT DAMAGE (DELAMINATION) IDENTIFICATION AND HEALTH MONITORING FOR COMPOSITE STRUCTURES — A REVIEW , 2000 .

[21]  N. Mansouri,et al.  Simple counting rule for optimal data fusion , 2003, Proceedings of 2003 IEEE Conference on Control Applications, 2003. CCA 2003..

[22]  Yang Xin,et al.  Image quality assessment by decision fusion , 2008 .