Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance using constant-pressure infusion—a method with real time estimation of reliability

The outflow conductance (C(out)) of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) system is a parameter considered to be predictive in selection for hydrocephalus surgery. C(out) can be determined through an infusion test. A new apparatus for performing infusion tests in a standardized and automated way was developed. The objective was to evaluate repetitiveness as well as to propose and evaluate a method for real time estimation of the reliability of individual C(out) investigations. Repeated investigations were performed on an experimental model simulating the CSF system, and on 14 patients with hydrocephalus. DeltaC(out), calculated as the 95% confidence interval of C(out), was introduced as an estimate of the reliability of individual C(out) investigations. On the model, no significant difference was found between DeltaC(out) and the actual C(out) variation in repeated investigations (p = 0.135). The correlation between the first and the second patient investigation was high (R = 0.99, p < 0.05), although there was a significant difference between the investigations (p < 0.05). The standard deviation of difference was 2.60 microl (s kPa)(-1). The repetitiveness of C(out) with the new apparatus was high, and DeltaC(out) reflected the reliability of each investigation. This feature has to be taken into account in every individual case, before making a decision or performing research based on measurements of C(out) in the future.

[1]  M. Kosteljanetz,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance measurements in the selection of patients for shunt surgery in the normal pressure hydrocephalus syndrome. A controlled trial , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[2]  J. Vanneste,et al.  Normal pressure hydrocephalus: did publications alter management? , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  A. Marmarou,et al.  Characterization of clinical CSF dynamics and neural axis compliance using the pressure‐volume index: I. The normal pressure‐volume index , 1980, Annals of neurology.

[4]  M. Czosnyka,et al.  A computer system for the identification of the cerebrospinal compensatory model , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[5]  S. E. Børgesen,et al.  The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[7]  P. Eide,et al.  A prospective study on the clinical effect of surgical treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus: the value of hydrodynamic evaluation , 2004, British journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  J Ekstedt,et al.  CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 2 . Normal hydrodynamic variables related to CSF pressure and flow. , 1978, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  J. Tans,et al.  How to select patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus for shunting. , 2002, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[10]  N. Graff-Radford,et al.  Variables predicting surgical outcome in symptomatic hydrocephalus in the elderly , 1989, Neurology.

[11]  S Ekholm,et al.  Normal pressure hydrocephalus: vascular white matter changes on MR images must not exclude patients from shunt surgery. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[12]  A. Eklund,et al.  Infusion technique can be used to distinguish between dysfunction of a hydrocephalus shunt system and a progressive dementia , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[13]  M. Czosnyka,et al.  Computerized infusion test compared to steady pressure constant infusion test in measurement of resistance to CSF outflow , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[14]  R. Katzman.,et al.  A simple constant‐infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption , 1970, Neurology.

[15]  J. Tans,et al.  CSF outflow resistance and pressure-volume index determined by steady-state and bolus infusions , 1985, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[16]  J Hermans,et al.  Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[17]  M. Kosteljanetz,et al.  Resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid determined by bolus injection technique and constant rate steady state infusion in humans. , 1985, Neurosurgery.

[18]  Paul R. Cooper,et al.  Servo-controlled lumbar infusions: A clinical tool for the determination of CSF dynamics as a function of pressure , 1978 .

[19]  S. E. Børgesen.  Conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[20]  J Ekstedt,et al.  The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with th idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. , 1995, Archives of neurology.

[21]  J Ekstedt,et al.  CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 1. Method of constant pressure CSF infusion. , 1977, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  J D Pickard,et al.  Testing of cerebrospinal compensatory reserve in shunted and non-shunted patients: a guide to interpretation based on an observational study. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[23]  A. Marmarou,et al.  A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. , 1978, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  J D Pickard,et al.  Hydrodynamic properties of hydrocephalus shunts. , 1998, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[25]  J D Pickard,et al.  Hydrodynamic properties of hydrocephalus shunts: United Kingdom Shunt Evaluation Laboratory. , 1997, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[26]  A. Eklund,et al.  An adjustable CSF shunt: advices for clinical use , 2003, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[27]  J. Krauss,et al.  Normal pressure hydrocephalus: survey on contemporary diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice , 2004, Acta Neurochirurgica.