Cochlear nerve action potentials during cerebellopontine angle surgery: relationship of latency, amplitude, and threshold measurements to hearing.

The cochlear nerve action potential (AP) was monitored during two types of hearing preservation surgery: (1) removal of small cerebellopontine angle tumors and (2) retrolabyrinthine vestibular nerve section. The purpose of this investigation was to study the relationship between changes in intraoperative AP latency, amplitude, and threshold, and changes in audiometric hearing subsequent to surgery. The presence or absence of a cochlear nerve AP toward the end of surgery accurately predicted the presence or absence of postoperative hearing (93%). Regression analyses were performed to explore the relationship between audiometric pre- and postoperative thresholds and intraoperative AP threshold changes. Statistically significant relationships were found for (1) pre-operative audiometric thresholds and initial AP click thresholds (p = 0.0068); (2) final AP click thresholds and postoperative audiometric thresholds (p = 0.0003); (3) AP click (p = 0.0001) and 1 kHz (p = 0.0006) threshold shifts and pre- to postoperative audiometric threshold shifts. No relationship was found between either AP latency or amplitude values and postoperative hearing. Intraoperative threshold measurements can be used as an indicator of hearing change. If amplitude or latency indices are also monitored it may be better to use stimulus levels close to the evoked potential threshold.

[1]  P. Jannetta,et al.  Monitoring Auditory Nerve Potentials during Operations in the Cerebellopontine Angle , 1984, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[2]  J. Nadol,et al.  Preservation of hearing in surgical removal of acoustic neuromas of the internal auditory canal and cerebellar pontine angle , 1987, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  S. Stanton,et al.  Cochlear Nerve Monitoring During Cerebellopontine Angle Operations , 1988, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[4]  H. Silverstein,et al.  Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery using intraoperative direct eighth cranial nerve monitoring. , 1985, The American journal of otology.

[5]  J. Wazen,et al.  Retrolabyrinthine Vestibular Neurectomy with Simultaneous Monitoring of Eighth Nerve and Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1985, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[6]  J. Durrant.  Observations on Combined Noninvasive Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response Recording , 1986 .

[7]  J. Wazen,et al.  Retrolabyrinthine vestibular neurectomy with simultaneous monitoring of eighth nerve action potentials and electrocochleography. , 1984, The American journal of otology.

[8]  C. Berlin,et al.  Human acoustic nerve action potential recordings from the tympanic membrane without anesthesia. , 1972, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[9]  L. Symon,et al.  Preservation of cochlear potentials in a deaf patient fifteen months after excision of an acoustic neuroma. , 1987, Scandinavian Audiology.

[10]  R A Levine,et al.  Monitoring Auditory Evoked Potentials during Acoustic Neuroma Surgery , 1984, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[11]  A. Møller,et al.  Monitoring auditory functions during cranial nerve microvascular decompression operations by direct recording from the eighth nerve. , 1983, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  R. Levine,et al.  Use of intraoperative auditory evoked potentials to preserve hearing in unilateral acoustic neuroma removal. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  A. Coats.  Electrocochleography: Recording Techniques and Clinical Applications , 1986 .

[14]  T. Iwabuchi,et al.  Deterioration of auditory evoked potentials during cerebellopontine angle manipulations. An interpretation based on an experimental model in dogs. , 1985, Journal of neurosurgery.